dajerx said:
Me and Non have been doing this shit here for fucking ever, and even before TMF we were providing said content about celebrities and providing clips. We both told you there is no tickling in the clip. You never asked for a description; hence the reason we never gave one. But sense you feel like pulling your dick out and flexing on us in front of everyone, here goes:
I was still contributing at the Mousepad and HITW when the stills were added. He never tickled her. Believe it or not, she was laughing at the conversation at hand, not him touching her. I think he was teasing her about her toes...cant remember. Occasionally, people can simultaneously laugh while their feet are being touched and it not be related to any tickling.
For the record, I never asked you to ignore anything. If you are a Teri Hatcher fan and like her feet, then the stills are great (done by Mallecho, I believe...great guy BTW). I believe you can email him from the site and ask him yourself, though I know if she had been tickled it would have been in the captions. They still do the descriptions under the vidcaps, correct? Frankly, if you like those, there are even better movie stills of her on the site from a movie (All Tied up, I think).
As for other guys having a problem with us telling you there was no tickling, Im going to guess and so that the majority of the people here have known me and Non for long enough (Christ Non...10 years we have known each other at least) and trust us. If we had even an inkling of a thought that there was the slightest bit of tickling in the scene we would have never stated "there was none." Often we post clips to allow people to decide for themselves if its on the fence; this time there is no fence. Non may not remember but he has the clip somewhere because I also had it; he sent it to me. I have since sent my entire VHS collection (10 tapes I believe) to him and more clips that will not be reposts will be uploaded. In other words; our reputations speak for themselves. We thought we were doing you a favor by saving you from going on a long Googling goose chase trying to find this clip that "so clearly" showed something you obviously wanted very badly to see (believe me, I have been there). Instead you viewed it apparently as us not trying to help you. We have been helping for way too long to have that card pulled on us by anyone in here.
I didn't have to ask for a description. It's incumbent on the part of the person claiming that particular evidence isn't valid to explain why. This used to be called common sense.
Nontkl indicated that he hasn't seen the original airing or the clip; he's going by what theatergoer and you have claimed. So he was in no position to explain what went on in those pics (originally posted by Drech by the way, not Miching Mallecho).
And you just admitted that your own memory is so shaky that you can't remember whether the guy was teasing her or not, but we're still just supposed to go on your sayso that no tickling took place.
By the way, HITW isn't perfect on captioning and listing everything there. They have three separate links for Courteney Cox because somebody there couldn't figure out how to spell her name.
Here's what I know: even sincere eyewitness testimony can be notoriously unreliable.
Exhibit A: an alleged foot tickling in A Farewell to Arms
"Farewell to Arms - oldie black and white. Gary Cooper sits at a table with a buddy and a bargirl, and she sits atop the table, legs crossed, while he takes off her shoe. Nice stockinged foot shot. He strokes the bottom of her sole and she jerks away violently."
http://www.ticklingforum.com/showthread.php?t=25620&highlight=farewell+arms
"The scene in Farewell to Arms occurs at around 7 minutes into the movie. ... However, the tickling scene is more of a foot scene than anything else. Basically, Gary Cooper removes the shoe of a woman sitting on his table (all you can see is her foot) and touches/tickles her foot before she jerks away (possibly more due to the side of the bar being blasted in, than the tickling itself)."
http://www.ticklingforum.com/showthread.php?t=51945&highlight=farewell+arms
Here's what I posted to tickletheater last month:
"I just saw the scene in 'A Farewell to Arms', which fortunately occurs early on in the film.
"NOT A TK SCENE!!
"Review: She's not wearing stockings (+); she has very nice feet (+); we never see her face (-); she giggles very nicely (++); she's giggling at Gary Cooper's clowning, he hasn't removed her shoe yet (-); when he removes her shoe, he touches her foot but she doesn't make another sound nor even twitch her foot(---); when she jerks her foot away, it's because a bomb just landed, not because she was tickled(---)."
But of course I'm also just an eyewitness, so take my assessment with a grain of salt as well.
Bottom line: people make mistakes all the time, but photographs and vidclips seldom lie. And when somebody would rather swing his dick around than simply explain why what we're seeing in a photograph ain't what we're actually seeing, then it's not the picture's or anybody else's credibility that becomes suspect.
