I'd have to disagree on that one. You see I've made a positive comment here but I feel that a producer deserves constructive criticism, *both* negative and positive. It helps to improve his work and thus gives the community better material. If one seriously feels the model is not ticklish, things couldn't go any wronger and have to be changed. If you get only positive comments as a producer but your sales drop you don't even know what your mistake is. The problem in this case was that the statements were getting a little rude.natural tickler said:I learned long ago that if you have nothing nice to say, say nothing at all...I think this phrase applies to tickle fetish. Move on. You gain nothing by negativity
I'm still surprised at how many people can say of themselves they have a "tickling fetish" while that means something different in every single case. I couldn't be watching a vid of which I have the slightest notion the 'lee might be faking. Others are satisfied when the "model is hot" and "selling it well". If I poke a girl in her side and she laughs just to amuse me and not because she's ticklish I would hate it and feel like an idiot. And that's how I feel when watching a bad video. Your fetish is definitely not the same that I have. That's fine, it just really intrigues me.kirasao said:Moving on, I really don't give two turds whether or not Viviana is faking in this or any other tickling video for all I care. What matters is she's hot, sells it well (in my opinion)
leechmaster said:I'm still surprised at how many people can say of themselves they have a "tickling fetish" while that means something different in every single case. I couldn't be watching a vid of which I have the slightest notion the 'lee might be faking. Others are satisfied when the "model is hot" and "selling it well". If I poke a girl in her side and she laughs just to amuse me and not because she's ticklish I would hate it and feel like an idiot. And that's how I feel when watching a bad video. Your fetish is definitely not the same that I have. That's fine, it just really intrigues me.
Are you serious with that comparison or just too annoyed to write a reasonable answer? If you watch an interview with the actor and he says "I think my acting in that movie was great" you can agree and say "I'm gonna watch his upcoming movies, too". Would you keep watching a model's vids after hearing her say "I can sell it very well"? If yes, you're the way I thought you were when I wrote my first response. However, if you talk about her putting up a show that won't let you discover her faking by any chance, then I couldn't complain, either. And actually there are lees where you can be almost a hundred percent sure she is *not* faking. So it does make a difference. But you wrote something like "I don't care if she's faking as long as..." So I can assure you I wasn't going out of my way but just trying to understand the way you look at it. No reason to react like you did. And even though your comparison was blatant nonsense I think I've finally come to the conclusion that I misread your initial post. Sorry about that.kirasao said:When you go to a theater and pay 8 bucks for a ticket, you don't do it because you believe what you're about to see is real.
The Bandito said:If you are looking for great acting - Scent of a Woman is fantastic!!! (Although I secretly think Al Pacino is faking the whole blind thing).
Be sure to check out Scent of a Woman.. (and write Pacino a really pissed off message if you think he's not blind).
leechmaster said:Are you serious with that comparison or just too annoyed to write a reasonable answer? If you watch an interview with the actor and he says "I think my acting in that movie was great" you can agree and say "I'm gonna watch his upcoming movies, too". Would you keep watching a model's vids after hearing her say "I can sell it very well"? If yes, you're the way I thought you were when I wrote my first response. However, if you talk about her putting up a show that won't let you discover her faking by any chance, then I couldn't complain, either. And actually there are lees where you can be almost a hundred percent sure she is *not* faking. So it does make a difference. But you wrote something like "I don't care if she's faking as long as..." So I can assure you I wasn't going out of my way but just trying to understand the way you look at it. No reason to react like you did. And even though your comparison was blatant nonsense I think I've finally come to the conclusion that I misread your initial post. Sorry about that.
So we both like the vid because we're quite convinced she is really ticklish. What were we actually talking about? I agree that everyone has a different perception of tickling material of course and I finally understand what you wanted to say. But you have to admit that you expressed yourself in a way that could easily be misunderstood ("I don't care if...") because actually you do care and just meant it's no use arguing too much about it.kirasao said:The reason I said I don't care if Viviana is a faker is because I have no reason to believe she is.
tickle fetish said:they are selling videos saying they are ticklish,has nothing to do with them being pretty. the point is and you even said this THEY ARE NOT TICKLISH,its all acting now. and one last thing,dont be so sure that Viv herself is the one answering this post,just think about it.
The Bandito said:(Although I secretly think Al Pacino is faking the whole blind thing).