Women and the comment sections per internet

[Wolf]

Whoa whoa whoa there psycho, no need to get so angry!

You're not answering what exactly is so terrible about the Standard Bearer, though. The argument is that these are horrible, terrible threatening things being done to these people, right? And Phil must've done and said horrifying things about these women in order to become such a pariah, right? Well... what was it? Remember it can't just be him saying that he questions their opinions or methods, now that would be a deliberate downplaying of the terrible things he's doing to these woman.

Those terrible things he's saying and doing are ____________.

I didn't say he was. Other people are. I could give a shit about Phil Mason. He has every right to his opinion.
I'm going to back to overlooking you, like the rest of the thread. I just wanted to dissuade you of the notion that anyone was afraid of seeing his opinions.

 

[Comfort Eagle]

I didn't say he was. Other people are. I could give a shit about Phil Mason. He has every right to his opinion.
I'm going to back to overlooking you, like the rest of the thread. I just wanted to dissuade you of the notion that anyone was afraid of seeing his opinions.

Now now, I never implied "afraid", just that you were so inept at making an actual point that was any deeper than "Psychos are a'scured of ladies rights!" that the second it wasn't the OP blithering like an imbecile all of you seemed immediately disinterested. Are you just so angry you can't actually read my posts? Calm down, nobody's your enemy! It's just that when there's clear evidence of the whole "You're all deliberately glossing over very clearly non-harassment being treated as terrorist attacks and as such it's undermining your opinions terribly" thing, all those little witticisms of yours just up and fucked off.

You're still doing that! Implied over and over "I'm not afraid nobodys afraid!" while... still not answering the point. Weird.

 

[chicago]

Honestly, I didn't want to respond to your posts in particular because you seem to want to incite anger.

The other reason is because I didn't see how that dude was connected to the two women being discussed here.

 

[Comfort Eagle]

Or you could watch the videos. Because those women and this topic is exactly what he's talking about. Not "almost kind of", not only for a minute, this exact topic. At length.

Like holy shit dude, seriously. "Want to incite anger"? Everyone in the thread is literally just baiting a mouthbreather at this point, and it would appear there's no desire to see it as anything more than a mouthbreather saying silly shit. Arguing that the issue at hand is a tad deeper than some illiterate shrieking "feminazis!!!" looks like a ploy to rile people up does it?

 

[Ticklerguy4u]

... he said, two hours after saying he wanted to move on.

touche'

 

[chicago]

Or you could watch the videos. Because those women and this topic is exactly what he's talking about. Not "almost kind of", not only for a minute, this exact topic. At length.

Like holy shit dude, seriously. "Want to incite anger"? Everyone in the thread is literally just baiting a mouthbreather at this point, and it would appear there's no desire to see it as anything more than a mouthbreather saying silly shit. Arguing that the issue at hand is a tad deeper than some illiterate shrieking "feminazis!!!" looks like a ploy to rile people up does it?

Yeah I'd care more about your video if you didn't sound insane. You asked why your post wasn't getting enough attention. "Holy shit baiting mouthreathers, dude. " That's why.

 

[Wolf]

"You ever hear the saying: 'If you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. If you run into assholes all day, you're the asshole.' " -Raylan Givens, Justified

 

[Comfort Eagle]

Look at all these angry people!

Yeah I'd care more about your video if you didn't sound insane. You asked why your post wasn't getting enough attention. "Holy shit baiting mouthreathers, dude. " That's why.

Is that not what you're doing. Is not the very, very stupid OP been getting way more attention for blatantly stupid things. I posted it once, none of you bothered with it so you could blurt your exaggerated bullshit, point back to it, ignore it again, point out you all seem to be doing it intentionally in order to pay more attention to the rambling idiot, and now that you've resorted to "I'm not watching that you're being an ass".

Yeah I'd care less about sounding insane if all of you weren't arguing in favor of "Well you know sometimes mean YouTube videos are terrorism..." and everyone with few flattering words to say about this ideology being terrified of the 20th century when there's a breakdown of the issue in front of you that you're all almost proud of not bothering with.

"You ever hear the saying: 'If you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. If you run into assholes all day, you're the asshole.' " -Raylan Givens, Justified

Awfully witty coming from a man arguing that "Legit terrorists on YouTube are hunting women take this seriously!" in spite of evidence of that being a blatant lie.

Nows about the time where one of you should be making the classic "Well you're being mean now, and that proves their point!" line, right?

 

[Wolf]

Look at all these angry people!



Is that not what you're doing. Is not the very, very stupid OP been getting way more attention for blatantly stupid things. I posted it once, none of you bothered with it so you could blurt your exaggerated bullshit, point back to it, ignore it again, point out you all seem to be doing it intentionally in order to pay more attention to the rambling idiot, and now that you've resorted to "I'm not watching that you're being an ass".

Yeah I'd care less about sounding insane if all of you weren't arguing in favor of "Well you know sometimes mean YouTube videos are terrorism..." and everyone with few flattering words to say about this ideology being terrified of the 20th century when there's a breakdown of the issue in front of you that you're all almost proud of not bothering with.



Awfully witty coming from a man arguing that "Legit terrorists on YouTube are hunting women take this seriously!" in spite of evidence of that being a blatant lie.

Nows about the time where one of you should be making the classic "Well you're being mean now, and that proves their point!" line, right?

You seem to be having an awfully good time responding so incisively to things that no one here is actually saying; it feels like it might be rude to interrupt that conversation.

 

[Comfort Eagle]

No need to explode in such anger there!

And I figured with all of you arguing at these woman hating phantoms I'd get in on the fun. While, of course, actually citing examples for my argument. Which are very well thought out and insightful whether or not you personally care to look at them or not.

 

[Wolf]

No need to explode in such anger there!

And I figured with all of you arguing at these woman hating phantoms I'd get in on the fun. While, of course, actually citing examples for my argument. Which are very well thought out and insightful whether or not you personally care to look at them or not.

Are you entirely sure you'd like to call that last sentence well thought out?

 

[Comfort Eagle]

The videos, you silly angry man. I've long since decided to just start taking the piss with the rest of you, what with the train of discussion seemingly going into "Who can come up with the smarmiest retort" territory.

I do recall you saying something about my professor friend there being shunned for his hateful, hateful opinions. And if you can be bothered to come up with any real reason besides "I'm not afraid of him!" for why anything the man says about this topic to be tossed aside that'd be super.

 

[chicago]

I never said mean YouTube videos were terrorism and I've found other people able to voice their opinion in a way thats not so antagonistic or incendiary, even if I disagree. I don't think people who resort to personal name calling or expressing themselves like an ogre deserve much more response than this. I think it's way easier to spit venom than come up with an articulate argument. So I understand why people choose to take that route. I just don't think they should expect serious / well thought out responses if that's their approach.

 

[Dussicar]

No need to explode in such anger there!

And I figured with all of you arguing at these woman hating phantoms I'd get in on the fun. While, of course, actually citing examples for my argument. Which are very well thought out and insightful whether or not you personally care to look at them or not.

I'm assuming there is some sexual tension between you,Don't Ask Just Tickle, Drew70, and Barney Stubble?

I checked the link for that freak you provided.

"Look. I have issues with women, I make money off the intert00bz, I don't care wut chyx sey, I would do my work fer freee, I won't get fired cuz they need me right now (until I'm replaced) ant they kan fire me cuz I make money off the intern00bz, and peeps on the webz will still find me, cuz alls I care about iz the universe, I paused too many times, cuz I have very little charisma anWHAT THE FUCK IS HE TALKING ABOUT???"

I swear to god, this thread was made on purpose with a sophomoric agenda.

PS: Rape culture!!!!!

Discuss.

I'm never afraid of book smart people, because they are the easiest to win against. They just don't provide the right stimulation for me in an argument, as opposed to those who have been in the trenches. I LOVE those fuckers!!!

 

[TMF Jeff]

Are you entirely sure you'd like to call that last sentence well thought out?

The videos, you silly angry man. I've long since decided to just start taking the piss with the rest of you, what with the train of discussion seemingly going into "Who can come up with the smarmiest retort" territory.

I do recall you saying something about my professor friend there being shunned for his hateful, hateful opinions. And if you can be bothered to come up with any real reason besides "I'm not afraid of him!" for why anything the man says about this topic to be tossed aside that'd be super.

You two need to cool it with all the personal attacks.

And really, putting that aside, are you ever going to figure out that you're not going to change each others minds? I mean, fuck! Are you planning to just do this for eternity?

 

[Comfort Eagle]

You two need to cool it with all the personal attacks.

And really, putting that aside, are you ever going to figure out that you're not going to change each others minds? I mean, fuck! Are you planning to just do this for eternity?

 

[meangry]

Look at all these angry people!



Is that not what you're doing. Is not the very, very stupid OP been getting way more attention for blatantly stupid things. I posted it once, none of you bothered with it so you could blurt your exaggerated bullshit, point back to it, ignore it again, point out you all seem to be doing it intentionally in order to pay more attention to the rambling idiot, and now that you've resorted to "I'm not watching that you're being an ass".

Yeah I'd care less about sounding insane if all of you weren't arguing in favor of "Well you know sometimes mean YouTube videos are terrorism..." and everyone with few flattering words to say about this ideology being terrified of the 20th century when there's a breakdown of the issue in front of you that you're all almost proud of not bothering with.



Awfully witty coming from a man arguing that "Legit terrorists on YouTube are hunting women take this seriously!" in spite of evidence of that being a blatant lie.

Nows about the time where one of you should be making the classic "Well you're being mean now, and that proves their point!" line, right?

Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn bashing has long been a cottage industry for anti-feminists who spin content about their profiteering from harassment, arguing the realism and validity of said harassment, and often times, themselves become profiteers to launch Patreons and Youtube channels and 'brand identity' and get themselves on the map on /pol/. To be frank, OP posted garbage. But what this is? It's akin to a republican and a democrat hollering at each other, and a libertarian slips in, seeing the republican getting their brains beaten in over something they themselves find important, and instead want to exert their will on the conversation because the republican isn't capable of doing so. So let's shave things down, let's get into the details, because it's in said details where the libertarian can pluck some specific fractional thing and strum that cord well enough to plant seeds of doubt in the democrat's mind about what they were arguing about in the first place.

I'm not giving up thirty minutes of my life to listen to thunderf00t prattle on about this because he himself put himself and his beliefs and his brand into the fire, and I'm not about to listen because it's about two steps away from sargon of akkad talking about DIGRA conspiracies.

No rational person is arguing "Well you know sometimes mean YouTube videos are terrorism..." because someone says "I think you're wrong", but let's not act like Anita or Zoe or others aren't dealing with Twitter DMs or private messages or personal mailings or emails threatening rape, death, assault, and a host of other insane bullshit over videos/a high performing kickstart or over a jilted ex's screed or saying "gamer is dead".

And nothing is going to come of this battleground of censorship outside a bunch of white men who look the stereotype trying to equate reprisal for outspoken behavior in a heavily sanitized world because of corporate culture (NOT feminism) as equal to threats of school shootings over speaking engagements.

 

[Comfort Eagle]

No rational person is arguing "Well you know sometimes mean YouTube videos are terrorism..." because someone says "I think you're wrong", but let's not act like Anita or Zoe or others aren't dealing with Twitter DMs or private messages or personal mailings or emails threatening rape, death, assault, and a host of other insane bullshit over videos/a high performing kickstart or over a jilted ex's screed or saying "gamer is dead".

Then why say it. Then why repeatedly keep trying to knock off Youtube channels and Twitter accounts. Let's do this other thing where being sent a death threat over email (to which for whatever reason both are very quick to remind everyone how they totally don't think they should have to prove, while we're at it) doesn't make everything that comes out of their mouths infallible. Lets maybe realize that the conference they were brought in to be the public faces of has been derided by every end of the spectrum as garbage, and that only one of those individuals made any attempt to distance themselves from after the fact. Let's stop and realize that one of the reasons that report was torn apart at all was because of that egregious neckbeard crime of "Hey maybe lets stop and look at this before taking everything presented by a 'victim' as gospel".

I'm sure to some extent terrible things have been sent to them. What does that have to do with "And you know people are actually making sort of a career off calling us assholes!"? How is that anywhere close to being the horrible crime of a detailed rape threat being DM'd?

Yes, yes "rational" people are here arguing their equivalency, the fact that anybody at any point has argued maybe not everything they've said has been entirely forthcoming or as urgent as has been implied, and any assertion to the contrary has been instantly greeted with remarks like "Some groups of people seem to be terrified of what will happen if other groups of people ever become equal to them."

So no, that old man prattling 'trying to cozy up to /pol/' still isn't the same as getting your dox dropped in a threatening DM, shouldn't be considered to be on that same level of misogyny (at all), and some of the more pompous among you absolutely are equating the two.

 

[meangry]

Then why say it. Then why repeatedly keep trying to knock off Youtube channels and Twitter accounts. Let's do this other thing where being sent a death threat over email (to which for whatever reason both are very quick to remind everyone how they totally don't think they should have to prove, while we're at it) doesn't make everything that comes out of their mouths infallible. Lets maybe realize that the conference they were brought in to be the public faces of has been derided by every end of the spectrum as garbage, and that only one of those individuals made any attempt to distance themselves from after the fact. Let's stop and realize that one of the reasons that report was torn apart at all was because of that egregious neckbeard crime of "Hey maybe lets stop and look at this before taking everything presented by a 'victim' as gospel".

I'm sure to some extent terrible things have been sent to them. What does that have to do with "And you know people are actually making sort of a career off calling us assholes!"? How is that anywhere close to being the horrible crime of a detailed rape threat being DM'd?

Yes, yes "rational" people are here arguing their equivalency, the fact that anybody at any point has argued maybe not everything they've said has been entirely forthcoming or as urgent as has been implied, and any assertion to the contrary has been instantly greeted with remarks like "Some groups of people seem to be terrified of what will happen if other groups of people ever become equal to them."

So no, that old man prattling 'trying to cozy up to /pol/' still isn't the same as getting your dox dropped in a threatening DM, shouldn't be considered to be on that same level of misogyny (at all), and some of the more pompous among you absolutely are equating the two.

It's not "Hey maybe lets stop and look at this before taking everything presented by a 'victim' as gospel". It's anti-feminists with an agenda who have pre-decided validity of claims made by the two of them. This is that same game of "where's Obama's birth certificate? If he's got nothing to hide, just release the birth certificate!", and when it is released, Joe Arpaio then does a press conference with a power point presentation that determines it was fraudulent because the investigation was funded with neocon bullshit. It's opposition using both sides of the spectrum to be able to declare a victory. The man you posted about is one of these championing the idea that the shooting threat for an Anita speaking engagement is a hoax. Any thing posted by those women is going to be taken apart and processed by armchair conspiracy theorists.

The reasons Twitter handles and Youtube channels get taken down isn't for saying "you suck"; it's because of people posting long winded diatribes or basing entire online identities to harass and incite targets. It's not "you suck"...it's saying "everything you ever say is a lie, we have researched every little aspect of your life, you are a professional victim, you have no proof that this behavior exists, if you post proof that this behavior exists it was doctored or spurred on people within your own circle to perpetuate a myth". And, hell, people are out there getting money from schmucks for rebuttals to Anita like she's Michael Moore and they have to release their own poorly crafted FahrenHYPE 9/11 retort, and in the process, engage in borderline stalker behavior.

Clean up your last sentence, as I've read it eight times and I still don't understand what you mean because I can't make heads or tails out of what side is sending threatening DMs involving doxx.

You also want to hit me up as pompous here? Slow your roll. I knew your stance long before now given your posting on chans and the remarks about gamergate in your Tickle Porn game, as well as wanting to design a character tacitly off of Anita. This broad based "War against censorship" conversation fueled by notions of validity of evidence has been perpetuated by a group of people who have built a movement of rage dating back to a fucking kickstarter getting more money than asked for involving a series of video game videos about tropes against women in games because...well...I don't know why. Because they felt something they were interested in was about to be attacked by feminism? Like the shit even mattered to people...yet it's so offensive that there were men looking the stereotype talking about how the goddamn IRS needed to crack down on Anita because of the way the funds from Kickstarter were used.

I don't care about people distancing themselves, or what outlets have to say, or any of that, because I've got more important shit to do in my daily life than track the latest goings on between pro-gamergaters who think white genocide is a thing and anti-gamergaters who prattle on about how they were triggered because their dad didn't correctly gender identify them as Fluttershy.

 

[P[a]pi]

I'm surprised that gamergate vs sjw, aka right vs left, isn't in the politics area. I'm against censorship (especially on the internet since it's one of the only free places left), but I gotta admit. I watched the full UN thing, and I didn't really get why the reaction of some was so extreme. I will also post a link that nobody will check out lol.

youtube.com/watch?v=4edkWYylmYs

I think this guy's solution is do-able. Allow the 2 chicks, and anybody else, to block the bs that is coming their way. And of course all illegal activities should be investigated, prosecuted, etc.

 

[Comfort Eagle]

It's not "Hey maybe lets stop and look at this before taking everything presented by a 'victim' as gospel". It's anti-feminists with an agenda who have pre-decided validity of claims made by the two of them. This is that same game of "where's Obama's birth certificate? If he's got nothing to hide, just release the birth certificate!", and when it is released, Joe Arpaio then does a press conference with a power point presentation that determines it was fraudulent because the investigation was funded with neocon bullshit. It's opposition using both sides of the spectrum to be able to declare a victory. The man you posted about is one of these championing the idea that the shooting threat for an Anita speaking engagement is a hoax. Any thing posted by those women is going to be taken apart and processed by armchair conspiracy theorists.

The reasons Twitter handles and Youtube channels get taken down isn't for saying "you suck"; it's because of people posting long winded diatribes or basing entire online identities to harass and incite targets. It's not "you suck"...it's saying "everything you ever say is a lie, we have researched every little aspect of your life, you are a professional victim, you have no proof that this behavior exists, if you post proof that this behavior exists it was doctored or spurred on people within your own circle to perpetuate a myth". And, hell, people are out there getting money from schmucks for rebuttals to Anita like she's Michael Moore and they have to release their own poorly crafted FahrenHYPE 9/11 retort, and in the process, engage in borderline stalker behavior.

Clean up your last sentence, as I've read it eight times and I still don't understand what you mean because I can't make heads or tails out of what side is sending threatening DMs involving doxx.

You also want to hit me up as pompous here? Slow your roll. I knew your stance long before now given your posting on chans and the remarks about gamergate in your Tickle Porn game, as well as wanting to design a character tacitly off of Anita. This broad based "War against censorship" conversation fueled by notions of validity of evidence has been perpetuated by a group of people who have built a movement of rage dating back to a fucking kickstarter getting more money than asked for involving a series of video game videos about tropes against women in games because...well...I don't know why. Because they felt something they were interested in was about to be attacked by feminism? Like the shit even mattered to people...yet it's so offensive that there were men looking the stereotype talking about how the goddamn IRS needed to crack down on Anita because of the way the funds from Kickstarter were used.

I don't care about people distancing themselves, or what outlets have to say, or any of that, because I've got more important shit to do in my daily life than track the latest goings on between pro-gamergaters who think white genocide is a thing and anti-gamergaters who prattle on about how they were triggered because their dad didn't correctly gender identify them as Fluttershy.

Doing that thing again. Some people are being dickheads, therefore nobody can call anything they do at any point into question. Two morons made a dud of a doc therefore anyone taking more than a minute and a half to point out some contradictions is a foaming at the mouth /pol/lock.

Holy fuck, I used tropes in a porn game and based it off someone people would be familiar with?! Holy shit, damning! ... unless you didn't see the character who was a right-wing hillbilly moonshiner blockading herself in the mountains that sends you off to steal "indoctrination" textbooks from the school. Forget that part? Or maybe did you think that was my genderbent self insert character and that's what I actually think? You know that game had an actual devil in it, too. What part of my psyche got exposed with that gem?

You're doing the exact same thing everyone else is; they're unable to be criticized in any form for any reason because other people are fuckheads. Nothing they say can be called into question because some other people are psychos, therefore anyone who would ever think negatively of them, to any extent, must actually think they're conniving cunts that should be murder. Afraid of them and wanting desperately to be harmed and/or murdered.

I'm surprised that gamergate vs sjw, aka right vs left, isn't in the politics area. I'm against censorship (especially on the internet since it's one of the only free places left), but I gotta admit. I watched the full UN thing, and I didn't really get why the reaction of some was so extreme. I will also post a link that nobody will check out lol.

youtube.com/watch?v=4edkWYylmYs

I think this guy's solution is do-able. Allow the 2 chicks, and anybody else, to block the bs that is coming their way. And of course all illegal activities should be investigated, prosecuted, etc.

Oh, fun fact! That guy was actually "exposed as a harassment sympathizer!" not long ago as well for not having the precise 'correct' opinion about all this shit. Go read up on what happened to him. Oh, but realize that he was very clearly a woman hating MRA and that he totally had it coming!

 

[Wolf]

Well, this thread certainly took a turn......

 

[Comfort Eagle]

Personally I'm interested to hear if the semi-consensual handjob scene in that game will have reveal some unnerving internalized viewpoints in regards to female on male sexual assault.

 

[Wolf]

There are just too many layers....

 

[Bohemianne]

I will also post a link that nobody will check out lol.

Right. Hahahaha!