Recent content by brotherted

There was one I remember that was extremely believable. I have the feeling someone on this forum will remember the producer. It was an F/F video, and no guy was heard or seen at all until maybe 75-90% into the clip, at which point the guy producer could be heard interrupting the shoot, asking...

So much great about this producer, especially the choices of models, the consistent arms-overhead bondage, and the excellent focus on sides, bellies and upper body. My one request: Can future videos include verbal / psychological teasing arcs as well. Please DM for specifics. Good luck.

While the talk on this board is mostly about harder core, bondage-driven, make-them-lose-it sessions (including from me), there's actually something else I've loved for many years: Those situations where you're with someone you've known for a long time, whether alone or in public, and in just...

It's okay if we disagree, but I'm looking to clarify your view. If he'd instead written a long message and described in detail what he wants her to do, except asked her for a normie-style of sex act, you think her response video would have been the same, i.e. repeatedly saying the word "weird"...

It's only a YouTube short, so it just takes a few seconds to watch: I believe her repeated use of the word "weird" implies she thinks tickling itself is weird, although maybe some will defend her as just meaning that an unsolicited sexual DM of any kind is weird. But no, I think she's making...

While there are exceptions in any generalization involving human beings, I think guys generally tickle harder and girls softer. This loose correlation even plays out in the majority of professionally produced tickling videos, where you'd assume lers would be coached in advance to some degree...

If it's someone you're already dating, I'd just try the 1-second poke in the sides, and see what kind of feedback you get. Be ready for everything from "I hate that," to them poking you back.

Sorry to hear you changed your mind. But in case you'll consider changing it again, remember that lots of producers will offer for the model to bring her girlfriend and pay them to tickle each other. Or they suggest that models can bring a guy friend who can sit at watch just off-camera...

I think you make a valid distinction. I suppose if I were to refine it to get closer to what I was wondering, given your points, I'd edit it to, "Has tickling, for you personally, ever felt sexual?"

I honestly have no idea what the survey results would be. Obviously, people on this site would say "Absolutely, yes"... but we also all know people who just think of tickling as either funny or fun, as well as others who'd say it's awful or annoying. If I were to take a wild stab at it, I'd...

This is the answer: Midriff shirts and stretching with arms above head -- especially in close proximity, i.e. arms reach. For bonus points, close your eyes during the stretch to offer the opportunity for a perceived surprise attack (even though you know exactly what you're doing).

We're all different, but to me this would kind of take a lot of the fun and spontaneity out of it. Imagine the identical style of contract, except for a normie sexual interaction: "The party of the first part may kiss the party of the second part on the neck, cheek, lips and jaw, but not on the...

I like when old threads like this get resurrected for a new life! Seems like the answers are pretty equally divided between the feet version and the torso version. For torso 'lers like me, I can tell you what one woman I lived with used to do. It was: 1) Wear a thin T-shirt, usually that left...

Not the best film ever, to be sure. But it certainly wasn't bad. The "Follow Her" trailer offers a brief shot of one of the two tickling scenes:

Couple of quick thoughts: 1) When a subject is mentioned multiple times, and two basic different perspectives are cited in each round, it's meaningless for either side to say the other side is "arguing in circles" -- because it's never my side doing the redundancy thing, of course, it's...