It seems justatickler did not get very good grades in his "extreamly recent and blindingly obvious US history" exam.
Just to bring you up to date the "drivel about airline crashes" was a reference to an event wich took place in New York at the world trade centre on sept 11: 2001. Are you seriously telling me you had no idea what I was refering to? if so, you need a doctor real quick.
I have no idea how you get the impression I am mounting "a partial attack" on second ammendment defenders. I am mounting a full frontal attack.
You then go on to say you have no idea what my opinon is on the matter? really? you have no idea what my opinion is? seems you did poorly in your english comprehension grades as well.
Just to explain then, I am in favour of gun control...doh!
My point is very clear and very obvious, and I suspect your real problem is you have no plausible answer, hence your refuge in "witty" "urbane" putdowns.
However I will indulge you a little further (do try and keep up this time) The US recieved a very nasty shock on 9/11, hundreds of innocent people lost their lives. The whole US was rightly determined to make sure that nothing like it would ever happen again in the US. That is of course a perfectly correct attitude to take, and the US government has been working hard ever since to make sure that it cannot happen again. No stone has been left unturned, no expense has been spared, no obsticle has been allowed to get in the way of this goal.
So far all the measures taken have been a success. Now my point is if the US can take such firm action to prevent people dying as a result of an airliner being flown in to a building, why cant it show the same level of concern for innocent kids who get shot at school?
How many innocent US citizens have been shot since 9/11? why is being struck by an airliner worthy of so much government intervention? when being shot dead at school produces lame excuses about ancient ammendments and banal, pointless explanations about guns being harmless unless someone pulls the trigger.....oh really? I had no idea!!!....so, let me get this straight....smeone has to pick a gun up and fire it at someone for it to be dangerous?.....i cant believe I missunderstood that.
Thanks for putting me right on that one.
As for the suggestions that my line of posting is off topic, well, someone committs the biggest mass murder in US history by shooting kids with a gun, and your telling me that to mention gun control is off topic?