there is quite a bit of evidence to suggest that the towers were collapsed in a controlled demolition (with explosives), the evidence of this is
a)If u look at the close up videos of the towers collapsing (there isn't many due to fix news etc) you'll see that there are explosions around multiple support areas straight before they collapsed
b)Whilst a) could have been due to the attack caused by the planes, the actual fire in both towers went out before they collapsed.
c) the towers fell with the maximum gravity possible, which can only be achieved through explosives
d) wtc 7, the building next to the twin towers also collapsed due to "small fires" (due to the official report) how does a building collapse due to small fires?
e) the support beams from the wreckage were recycled as soon as possible and only $600,000 dollars spent on the investigation into their collapse (whereas millions on bill clinton fucking an intern)
whilst i am still unsure on this theory there is no doubt in my mind that they knew about this and it is likely that the pentagon attack was not a terrorist attack. i believe this because
a) the damage done to the building was minor compared to other 757 crashes that have happened in history - the damage itself did not match the size of the plane
b) despite the damage to the building being minor the government claim that the plane and it's passengers vaporised which explains why no bodies were found however they reckon they found traces of dna in the wreckage (convenient eh?)
c) the actual footage showing the attack on the pentagon by a cctv camera shows the date 12th sept 2001 - a day after the actual attack
d) the pictures released by the government were from a cctv camera that apparantly went at 100 frames per second and was blurred in order to hide the identity of whatever hit the pentagon - there are no cctv cameras that go at 100 frames per second and even tho if the frames are put together the footage is still "laggy". the speed of the footage also shows that the explosion upwards was going at 6000 miles per hour (is 6000 mph realistic? i dont think so)
e) only minor wreckage was found however about 60 tons of wreckage should have been recovered
f) the section that was hit was evacuated before the attack
g) in a later interview rumsfeld accidentally sed the pentagon was hit by a missile
h) reports from radar staff say that an american military aircraft was flying behind the object that hit the pentagon - the type of aircraft used to control Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in combat
in my honest opinion (and i dont mean to offend anyone by this) that 9/11 to bush was what the reichstag fire was to adolf hitler - in the 1930's hitler used the burning down of the reichstag parliament building to bring in his enabling act that allowed him to persecute opposition parties and later jews. I believe that (and i think it's absolutely sick) bush just sees 9/11 as an excuse to wage his "war on terror" which is really for personal gain, which has taken thousands of innocent lives (even the official figure shows more than tenfold the bodycount of 9/11) and ironically made the west a more likely target for terrorists.
a final thought for the readers - with iraq george bush claimed that he suspected that iraq had wmd's (which they didnt) so invaded them, another justification was the disgusting persecution on iraqi people by saddam hussein. Now if these were the only reasons why not invade a country which has a) concentration camps b) threatened the west with nuclear war c) neighbouring a friendly country and has also threatened that. well that country does exist and it's called north korea, the reason bush didnt invade that was because it is not a muslim state so therefore the 9/11 attacks could not be linked to them, and also because north korea has no oilfields (do not forget that DICK cheney used to be the director of Halliburton oil)
please excuse grammar as i am typing fast
p.s - the fbi definition of "terrorism is as follows -
the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.
well this seems to me what george bush has done to iraq, surely that makes him a terrorist, and if he's a terrorist then it doesnt surprise me if he let 9/11 happen
