bugman said:Liars,theves,alcoholics and drug addicts? I thought we were talking about the Bush family,not the Kennedys.![]()
![]()
primetime said:i didnt get the see (or hear) the speech, but it amazes me how many people criticize Bush. is he the best President ever? no. is he the worst? depends on your point of view. and out of curiousity, how many of these "Bush is an idiot" posters are Democrats. i think an overwhelming majority are.
nothing wrong with that, but keep this in mind. if the United States leaves, everything isnt going to be rosy. Iraq will turn into an abyss of complete chaos. if that happens, guess who gets the blame? the United States. once our troops leave and the Iraqis destroy themselves, the same people criticizing Bush now, will criticize that he didnt "clean up the mess he made". the United States is "damned if we do, damned if we dont".
another thing that concerns me is what Mr. Osama Bin Laden said about us Americans. he believes that Americans do not have the stomach for a long conflict. he knew that if this country gets into a "fight" that doesnt end quickly, the American public will sour and demand that we "retreat". face it, Americans like "instant gratification". it hurts me to say it, but Osama is right. Americans do not have the patience to win a war. from the outset, Bush said this wasnt going to be quick and this "war on terror" was going to take years, but lo and behold, Americans are crying that we should leave. my opinion is this, we leave now, those terrorists and other "rogue" nations will have the confidence that the United States can be beaten. look how bold Osama got when the Russians left Afghanistan. there is no way in hell Afghanistan should have been able to hold off the Soviets but they did and that emboldened Bin Laden. he called us a "paper tiger". everyone knows we have the power to destroy anything in our path, so to fight us, they cant fight the way we normally see conflict. it's a patience game for them. everyday of their lives they are in some kind of battle. what's a typical American conflict on a daily basis? "should i get fries with that?".
Basically Osama called us a bunch of punks and bitches with no guts to fight. he KNEW the American public would start to get tired of war and start complaining because the war is not "over" yet. guess what? he is right. i have friends that served in Iraq and yeah, it sucks to be over there. soldiers are dying over there and it is a truly tragic thing. but, leaving will not be a good idea until everything can be stabilized over there. leaving will only cause MORE problems, not less. if you want to complain about Americans dying, can we please have the same kind of outrage with gang violence in this country, which is taking MORE INNOCENT LIVES than the entire Iraq conflict? naw, as long as the gang violence doesnt come into your life, why should you care about that innocent little girl that gets caught in cross-fire? why should you care about kids getting shot because of they accidently crossed into gang territory? no, Americans want to bitch about a conflict that we need to see to the end. we have no choice people.
okay, send your angry responses my way...just remember though. you have your opinion, i have mine....
bugman said:You must be to young to remember Jimmy Carter,kis.But i still respect you and like you.😀
kis123 said:I remember six years of Nixon and two years of Ford; how could anyone realistically expect Carter to have great success after those two? He had nothing to work with but past scandal, screw up, and poorly attempted clean ups-I think he didn't deserve all the bad rap he took over his presidency.
There is nothing on earth that'll convince me that our present president isn't the worst one in my history.
maniactickler said:Your filling your students heads with liberal propaganda? this is why i say the education system is failing in this country. the liberal education machine is poisoning our kids.![]()
tickledgirl said:The education system is failing so badly that people don't even know the difference between "Your" and "You're." It's disgraceful!

kis123 said:I remember six years of Nixon and two years of Ford; how could anyone realistically expect Carter to have great success after those two? He had nothing to work with but past scandal, screw up, and poorly attempted clean ups-I think he didn't deserve all the bad rap he took over his presidency.
There is nothing on earth that'll convince me that our present president isn't the worst one in my history.
maniactickler said:Please dont make excuses for the weakest, most pathetic president to ever serve this country. (carter) even with things the way they are, carter couldnt hold Bushs jock strap.

tickledgirl said:The education system is failing so badly that people don't even know the difference between "Your" and "You're." It's disgraceful!
kis123 said:Get real!!!
Hell, by the way he's been running the country the last six years, I didn't know Bush had a place to put a jock strap! He will go down as the worst president in my lifetime's history-just wait and see.
Carter attempted to bring fairness and compassion in a place where there was no room for it and that was his only mistake!
Let's leave the foreign policy stuff for a bit because both said presidents failed miserably. At least under the Carter administration we could afford to go to school! How many Americans are in thousands of dollars of debt in the name of education? I'll probably get my AARP card before I finish paying for mine!![]()
Did you know that the pell grant maximum set in Carter's administration is the same amount over two decades later? Under the Bush administration, there are no good paying trade jobs. It seems like nowadays, you have to get a bachelors degree for dog-catching! Why can't he help making college more affordable? Then again, why can't he control a war he started? Why hasn't he done anything domestically except vote that marriage is a union between a man and a woman? Why bushie? Why?
At least I got you to graduate out of the Tourette's thing and blurt short paragraphs as opposed to you six-words-or-less outbursts. See, I knew I could help you with something..........![]()

maniactickler said:I disagree.![]()

kis123 said:With which part? Would you like to elaborate or do I get to guess? 😉
Or are you doing to six-words-or-less thing again?![]()

Yes, almost as disgraceful as resorting to spelling and typos to put down one's opponent. Bottom of the barrel for any on line debate, but hardly surprising.tickledgirl said:The education system is failing so badly that people don't even know the difference between "Your" and "You're." It's disgraceful!
primetime said:this is hilarious to call the current President the worst ever. hell, how can a President be considered a failure? the last time i checked, the United States is still a country that exists and not taken over by another nation. the United States still has the Bill of Rights. most Americans are not confronted with terrorist violence every day (save for gang violence). most Americans have jobs. Most Americans arent starving. if a President was truly bad, i think our overall quality of life would be vastly different. but nooooo, Bush is a failure and he is the worst President ever because he sent us to Iraq. funny how it was DEMOCRATIC Presidents that escalated the Vietnam war, but the Republicans are the evil ones... give me a damn break. all 43 Presidents (in reality, 42 individuals) have made sure our country is still in one piece. If Bush ever signs our surrender to another foreign power, and our way of life is gone, then you can call him the worst President ever. until then, stop griping because you are not in his shoes.
i know, i know, you can do a better job. yeah, right.

primetime said:this is hilarious to call the current President the worst ever. hell, how can a President be considered a failure? the last time i checked, the United States is still a country that exists and not taken over by another nation. the United States still has the Bill of Rights. most Americans are not confronted with terrorist violence every day (save for gang violence). most Americans have jobs. Most Americans arent starving. if a President was truly bad, i think our overall quality of life would be vastly different. but nooooo, Bush is a failure and he is the worst President ever because he sent us to Iraq. funny how it was DEMOCRATIC Presidents that escalated the Vietnam war, but the Republicans are the evil ones... give me a damn break. all 43 Presidents (in reality, 42 individuals) have made sure our country is still in one piece. If Bush ever signs our surrender to another foreign power, and our way of life is gone, then you can call him the worst President ever. until then, stop griping because you are not in his shoes.
i know, i know, you can do a better job. yeah, right.
maniactickler said:Im doing my tourettes thing that you enjoy.![]()

drew70 said:Yes, almost as disgraceful as resorting to spelling and typos to put down one's opponent. Bottom of the barrel for any on line debate, but hardly surprising.
kis123 said:As a matter of fact, I do think I could do much better. I'd start by listening to the people who elected me in the first place. They didn't want to go to war remember primetime? Remeber all the polls and protests primetime-Americans didn't want to go to Iraq. But Saddam had WMD and that is a huge US issue. Oh, Saddam was buddies with Osama who, btw there has NEVER been any legitimate proof he was the great 911 mastermind, has there?
I think before I sent thousands more troops over the last five years, I would have periodically assessed success. I also would have been training Iraqi to defend their own country so we could eventually transitioned out.
Instead we have over 3000 Americans dead, thousands more wounded, thousands more than that mentally scarred and damaged who just get sent home to deal with it on their own. Why is there no real program waiting for soldiers when they come home from Iraq to help transition them back into civilian life and make sure they're okay? No such program exists and I've talked to enough soldiers' families to know this is true. They struggle to find sanity on their own primetime, or did you know that?
I wouldn't have just looked at things short term since my daddy was able to end the Gulf War so quickly. I would've respected the fact that the Middle East has been at war since practically the beginning of time and they don't mind dying for their beliefs regardless of what Americans think about them.
You know in Native American culture, when there was a decision to be made, the thought process went through six generations. In some Asian cultures, they map out decisions over 100 years (which is why they're always ahead of us in business, education, and other levels). This president doesn't impress me as following his decision making through six minutes!
Cmon' prime, he blew it plain and simple! But you and maniac go in flames with him if you want to. Besides, you'll probably never know how I would ever handle it; your white house won't accept my brown-skinned self in there to find out anyway. So although I've made plenty of better decisions than he has made to date, the world will never benefit from them because Americans love their white men in the white house.
I don't know where you live, but I see signs of failure all over the place, people are leaving my city and state in droves because there are no real jobs here. Even those with bachelor and masters degrees are hard pressed to find jobs that will appropriately pay them per their education and experience. I'm making about 15,000 less per year on the average because it's either that or be unemployed. I shouldn't have to move in order to find work-local jobs should be available.
And since you've repeatedly mentioned gang-violence, what is being done about that? Let me answer that for you-nothing! He's such a great president who really cares for Americans; what has he done about it? Nothing! I have a solution for that too; since these gang-bangers love to kill over territory, I'd gather them up and send them to Iraq instead of troops who are decent people raising families and living decent lives. Since they have no respect for human life anyway, their dying in Iraq is of little consequence to me.
And maniac, the man is entirely too self-absorbed to solve anything like curing cancer and world hunger. Hell, he hasn't lifted a finger to help with poverty and hunger right here in America. He's so busy with his Iraq baby that he's basically bastardized his own people here in the US. If you want to argue that prime, answer me one question: in the six years he's been president, what has he done domestically of any importance that you can remember?