Animals and tickling...

[Knot Amewzed]

I never once saw her chastise, guy.

yeah, guy! LMAO!!!

 

[Goodieluver]

I have nothing against the concept but it personally does nothing for me. There were a slurry of TP videos that came out with goats and cats and whatnot. I saw them, was nice but would rather prefer the human to human reaction.

What will people think 50 yrs from now when we have robot tickling

"OMG, ROBOT TICKLING IS IMMORAL! ITS GROSS!!!!"

An animal is food, companionship and a tool. Use them accordingly

 

[alchemy]

We weren't necessarily putting anyone down for liking what they like or doing what they do. That's not the way we operate. We were simply giving an opinion and asking people to call in and engage us in a discussion. Apparently this was this was harder to do than starting a miffed thread about it after the fact.

Our opinion still stands. You're getting off to a form of pornography in which an animal is doing something to a human.

Yeah, that's totally not anywhere NEAR bestiality or zoophilia.

BTW, besides the bestiality angle, the Popeye cartoon wouldn't be considered porn either. What's your point?

 

[Imlatino]

For me, I hate seeing animal tickling.

Like on youtube, I search "tickling" and some of the videos are of animals licking a persons foot. Now I have a foot fetish but I still cannot get aroused by that.

I guess its just a matter of where the individual draws the line.

 

[ikaiyoo]

We weren't necessarily putting anyone down for liking what they like or doing what they do. That's not the way we operate. We were simply giving an opinion and asking people to call in and engage us in a discussion. Apparently this was this was harder to do than starting a miffed thread about it after the fact.

Actually no I sat on hold waiting to speak with you about this on the air... and you never mentioned the fact that you had a caller or asked me to hold on while you ranted. In fact in the chat room I mentioned that I was going to find my phone. and when you were well into your next topic and didn't mention to me that who ever was calling should call back. I decided to make a post about it which took me basically what 30 minuted to write and rewrite so i made sure i wasn't being rude and wasn't berating anyone when someone could read it. I didn't want this to be a flame war. So no it wasn't harder. I just was not given the opportunity to speak about this.

Our opinion still stands. You're getting off to a form of pornography in which an animal is doing something to a human.

Yeah, that's totally not anywhere NEAR bestiality or zoophilia.

And you have your right to have your opinion. Though I think your opinion is based off of a misunderstood definition of a term.

Yes YOU are getting off.... not the person that the animal is licking... not the person controlling the animal licking... YOU are getting off. which at that time is not bestiality or zoophilia... because YOU are nowhere near the animal... it is NOT either of those... now if YOU are having YOUR feet licked by an animal and YOU are stroking yourself off , then YES it is bestiality because YOU are engaging in sexual act with an animal... If in the video the person being licked is stroking or rubbing one off then YES it is a bestiality clip.

 

[Knot Amewzed]

Yes YOU are getting off.... not the person that the animal is licking... not the person controlling the animal licking... YOU are getting off. which at that time is not bestiality or zoophilia... because YOU are nowhere near the animal... it is NOT either of those... now if YOU are having YOUR feet licked by an animal and YOU are stroking yourself off , then YES it is bestiality because YOU are engaging in sexual act with an animal... If in the video the person being licked is stroking or rubbing one off then YES it is a bestiality clip.

Nothing, but love yoo; however, I still find the need to chime in here.

What you are saying than is one who "gets off" on watching an individual "get off" to having their feet licked by an animal is, in fact, "getting off" to bestiality. That is what the abovementioned suggests.

With that being the demonstrated situation...

If said clip involves a woman as the lee; it may be difficult to tell if the woman is "getting off" due to the lack of visible "stroking". Let us now assume that she is "getting off" unbeknownst to us. Are we observing bestiality?

How do we know if it is bestiality if we have to assume that the individual who partakes in this event is, in fact, "getting off"?

 

[ikaiyoo]

If said clip involves a woman as the lee; it may be difficult to tell if the woman is "getting off" due to the lack of visible "stroking". Let us now assume that she is "getting off" unbeknownst to us. Are we observing bestiality?

How do we know if it is bestiality if we have to assume that the individual who partakes in this event is, in fact, "getting off"?

If the woman is recieving sexual pleasure from the animal licking her feet, underarms, wherever... She is engaging an act of bestiality. She is engaging in a sexual act at the time she experiences sexual pleasure or fullfillment from the animal licking her.

 

[chicago]

If the woman is recieving sexual pleasure from the animal licking her feet, underarms, wherever... She is engaging an act of bestiality. She is engaging in a sexual act at the time she experiences sexual pleasure or fullfillment from the animal licking her.

Zoophilia, from the Greek ζῷον (zṓion, "animal") and φιλία (philia, "friendship" or "love"), also known as bestiality, is the practice of sexual relations between humans and animals, or a preference or fixation on such practice. A person who practices zoophilia is known as a zoophile.[1]

^ "Zoophilia," Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2009; accessed January 24, 2009.

 

[ikaiyoo]

Zoophilia, from the Greek ζῷον (zṓion, "animal") and φιλία (philia, "friendship" or "love"), also known as bestiality, is the practice of sexual relations between humans and animals, or a preference or fixation on such practice. A person who practices zoophilia is known as a zoophile.[1]

^ "Zoophilia," Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2009; accessed January 24, 2009.

OK so exactly what are you saying here? are you agreeing with my statement are you disagreeing with it... I am confused... because you put the definition of the word zoophilia as a reference to me answering a question that if the person is receiving sexual gratification in a clip from an animal tickling the person it is then bestiality... Which is exactly what I was saying...

Or are you saying that in argument to my previous statements that have absolutely nothing to do with that one.

I was, in my opinion, answering a question Knot asked about what is considered bestiality.

 

[ViperGTS]

I agree with ikaiyoo. If you were having sex with the animals or they were having sex with you, that would be beastiality. Being tickled by an animal, however, is not.

 

[LindyHopper]

I don't think it helps to get too hung up on the exact definition of "bestiality." If an animal is being violated (as in with forcible insertion), that's wrong. If the animal is a consensual participant, then nothing immoral is taking place. It doesn't matter to the animal whether or not the human is getting turned on. Such activities may not float my boat, but there's no real reason to get bent out of shape about them.