any straight guys had a tickle session with other guys?

[giggle-maker]

LOL Jonmath is GOD!

And just so happens to be 100% dead on correct.

Sorry, it's the truth.

 

[mickbds]

Geezo! was just looking for some advice, didn't mean to cause so much stress.

But thank you to all the people who have given positive advice 🙂

 

[rhiannon]

TO, if I can give you one advice, if you want to do it, just freaking do it an quit worrying about being gay, straight or whatever the hell you want to call it! If you are, you are, if you're not, you're not! No need to define yourself!

 

[Jericho716]

I'm bi, which means I'm also gay.

Thank you.

Finally somebody understands that.

There's no such thing as "half gay" (bi).

You're gay.

Accept it and move on.

 

[Rustenexcel87]

I like the f/m & m/f thing. I like to watch f/f, I am a straight guy. I have also did the m/m thing. There was nothing sexual about the m/m thing for me. I am more a lee then a ler. To ler is fun. To lee with a women who I am dating can turn into something sexual but I need more then just tickling. I need foreplay. I need to make out with the lady. I need lift her hair and kiss the back of her neck. I need to lovingly stroke her breast or tongue her nipples, and wisper sweet not hinging into her ear.
I need her to touch me in some sexual areas as I do these things to her. I want to do these things to her. I never wanted to do these things to a man.
Tickling is like opening up the car door for me, it's not like putting the key in the ignition. I need a lot more then just tickling to get me into a sexual mood.
To ler or lee with a guy is not sexual with me. I like tickling and I like to be tickled.
99% of my f/m and m/f tickle experiences were not sexual for me. Why? Because they were with women from this community who I am friends with and nothing more. Most of these amazing ladies are in committed relationships and I have a great respect for their boyfriends/husbands. These guys have extended me the privilege of engaging in tickle play with their women. The play is just good clean fun. I would not disrespect these women or their men by trying to turn a little tickling into something sexual. These women trust me and I would not cross the line.
As a result these tickle sessions are not sexual for me because I will not attempt foreplay before, during, or after the tickling. As for guys. I have no interest in having sex with a man. Any m/m session I have had has been done privately and I never had a desire to have a sexual encounter with a guy after a bit of tickling.

With that said, you will never see me at a gathering seeking out a m/m session nor will I talk of m/m. I am friends with many people in this world who the idea of m/m tickling is just not their thing, and I respect that. When I go to a gathering I'm all about finding a lady to play with. I can find a m/m session without looking too hard on-line. If I have the opportunity to play with a willing lady, I am going to follow that lead. The last thing I need to do is make myself an outcast. (and if this post has done that, so be it)
Up to now I was afraid to admit any of this on here; however, I no longer care. I have been active in this community going to various events (all be it not much as a poster on here due to a lack of time working 3 jobs) for a little over 2 years now. In that time I have made some incredible friends, most of who know all about me. Others could have put two and two together based on the fact that I got friends into all sorts of tickling be it m/f , f/f, f/m, or m/m on my fetlife profile. My point is I have made some awesome friends who will still be my friends after this post. If people don’t want to be my friend because of this post, well then I like to think there was no basis for a friendship from the start and I am better off having a few true friends then lots of false friends. If this post black lists me from anybody's little click on this web site or a live event, then my attitude is you don't deserve to get to know me and be my friend. I will take you for who you are and not judge you, at the same time I will go out of my way to respect you as well as respect both your limits and ideas and will not try to impose my ideas on you.
Feel free to bash me in a reply if you will. Call me what you will if you wish, I don’t care. I have been called worse things in life than gay.
BTW for those of you who personally know me and did not know about this, particularly the guys I have made friends with in the past. I’m still the same guy you knew and drank with and shot the b.s. with before and I will be the same guy after. I have never approached you about a m/m session and I have no intensions of doing it now. I would never want to betray the trust of a friend.

 

[HeadRed]

I punched a guy in the face for trying to tickle me once.

 

[kcantankerous]

A:

When you do so, you'll get my 'cogent' reply.

B:

Well, the female ones wouldn't, would they?

As for the heterosexual men who lie back in a heterosexual way and happily allow you, an avowedly uncloseted and completely 'out' homosexual, access to them... IF during the non-sexual tickling they then decided they were actually straight men who want to try sex with other men (in a heterosexual fashion, naturally) what would your reaction be? Of course we must realize that having consensual sex with other men in no way indicates that a man has any gay tendencies, even if things conclude with a nice, satisfying orgasm.

I respect the fact your own innocence and self control combine to such an extent that you CAN separate sex and tickling, that you would never regard what you had done as any form of foreplay, and thus you would not have any desire to comply should your male playmates develop a 'heterosexual-enhanced' libido which resulted in them developing the urge to engage in non-gay sex with you. Even if the request came from the really handsome and muscular ones, or for argument's sake the attractive heterosexual cross-dressers, for the latter practice according to current thinking is also a straight man's pursuit.

In conclusion, thank you very much for making me understand how very wrong I was.

Hello Libertine,

So I read the conversations, which I should always do first but given my laziness I looked at your first forum replay and the last one before it was suggested (rightly by you) to look at the whole thing. Libertine, let me apologize because my perception of the exchange was anchored to the perceived (possibly misconstrued) questioning of ones straightness in the manner that you did "referring to "stilettos" and what not. Considering the original post was not requesting such a debate.

Still that is no excuse for someone like myself or anyone to jump in without getting the complete picture, which I of course erred. Still, I believe, as others have said, boundaries can be set beforehand, to avoid the scenario you outlined, than tickling will not always lead to sexual encounters or switching teams. The world and people aren't black and white (figuratively speaking), just because we enjoy tickling some can compartmentalize and others can't. Some see it as pure fun and so on.

I prefer women because I enjoy the way a woman's laugh sounds among other things (surely this phrase will be used to refute my point). I jumped into this initially because I felt that a seemingly honest first request evolved into what the thread is now, thanks to your comment Libertine (to be fair if it wasn't you it was only a matter of time before someone else would).

However, as always, I respect your opinion and those on this forum. I do not consider you anything derogatory, and I apologize if any of my posts gave that impression.

Thanks,
K

 

[stockytickler]

Thank you.

Finally somebody understands that.

There's no such thing as "half gay" (bi).

You're gay.

Accept it and move on.

You're delightful. I love boobies too, baby, just happen to be dating a guy at the moment. In the same way as people date lots of other people in their lives.

But you're right, if I'm attracted to dudes I've never been attracted to chicks, and never mind the actual event, I never got hard in anticipation of having sex with my girlfriends never once ever. [/sarcasm]

Hello, and welcome to the Internet, where you occasionally meet people who don't readily conform to your preconceived notions of them.

Accept it and move on.

 

[kucheeku]

Last thing I'll say about this: I'm a regular contributor and reader of TKLFrat.com, a forum for m/m tickling. It's a respite from the narrow-minded, homophobic nonsense sometimes posted on this forum. The existence and growth of TKL says a lot about how far the tickle community needs to go to accept and speak up for m/m tickling, regardless of perceived orientation and of perceived expectations during sessions.

Speaking out with support for guys who are interested in m/m tickling want some helpful advice in expanding their experiences is helping your community. To those who have done so, thank you. To the others: tickling isn't all */f, nor is it all sexual.

 

[sushi854]

I don't post here that often but these types of threads always intrigue me. Basically, I'm totally straight too, and I haven't had a blowjob in a while. I can't seem to find any women willing to give me one, and paying for them would get too expensive, so I'm thinking of getting one from a guy. After all, it's only about the blowjob, right? Doesn't matter who you get it from???

In all seriousness, the thing that I don't always understand is that there are some here who DO separate the tickling from sex, or isolate sexual tickling to the tickling itself rather than a joint activity with a partner. I don't do this, and I believe that the folks who are critical/suspect of the OP's motives/sexual orientation do not either. I'm not trying to be homophobic or judgmental, but a tickle session with a guy would not be an option for me even during the most severe tickle drought, because it just would not interest me. I also wouldn't want to tickle/be tickled by a good friend, a gorilla, a robot, a machine, aliens, a mythical creature, or anything other than a human female to whom I am sexually attracted. That said, there is nothing wrong with same sex tickling or tickling for fun, and there is nothing wrong with detaching tickling from the context of a joint sexual activity (even when the person feels a certain "compulsion" toward tickling). But when someone solicits advice from the entire forum they are bound to receive a variety of opinions.

 

[kopfhorer]

Yeah, though Libertine's response strikes me as carrying a somewhat unnecessarily insulting tone, I must admit that I too have a hard time imagining why a completely straight man would want to session with another man.

What, exactly, would be the appeal?

While I've never sessioned with another male, straight men and women have been known to try other kinds of activities with members of their own sex, so why not tickling? Put another way, tickling a willing same-sex partner's feet IMO isn't quite the same as climbing into bed with the aforementioned partner.

 

[Morpheus72]

hi
sorry if this has came up on the forum before, but was just wondering if any straight guys have met up with any guys on here or from anywhere else for a tickle session. Finding a lady who is prepared to be a ler or lee is fairly impossible, and going to a pro domme place can be very costly.

I'm totally straight myself, but I am looking for the thrill of being restrained and helpless, squirming and begging for the tickling to stop. my favourite sites are tickleabuse and tickleintensive, I have long watched their videos and wished to be the one in the seat 🙂

I think it would be weird with another guy but could also be fun.

so just seeing if anybody on here has had an experience like this? and would you recommend it?

thanks

On topic reply -- I can't imagine many straight guys would consider an m/m session since a majority consider tickling as sexual. If - admittedly a big IF - tickling is not sexual for you, then an m/m session would only be weird to the extent you'd be going against what seems to be a societal norm. That said, you want to do it, so do it. It doesn't really matter what it does or doesn't do to your "orientation", does it? Maybe it does, given your careful wording.