TexasTicklin
TMF Regular
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2004
- Messages
- 158
- Points
- 0
I disagree, in my experience the extra fat/skin makes them less ticklish. I love counting ribs and it's kinda difficult to do it to heavy set women.
False.
I disagree, in my experience the extra fat/skin makes them less ticklish. I love counting ribs and it's kinda difficult to do it to heavy set women.
OK My apologies if I offended anyone. Thats the last thing I want is drama.
Second when I said bigger I meant width/length wise not fat. I like big feet and long toes, I actually hate really skinny feet even if they are pretty
. . . how do so-called BBW women have bigger feet? I'm not overly huge but definitely plus-sized, and my feet are a size seven.
I know from bitter experience that nothing makes us TMF Novices feel more unwelcome than being lambasted over an honestly innocent posting.
I wasn't trying to make anyone feel unwelcome . . . . No one said, "You suck get out!" We said, "Hey man, not cool." I hardly think that qualifies as being lambasted.
I apologize. I let some of my own very painful experiences here and elsewhere unduly influence my inappropriate word choice for the present situation.LOL yeah I thought we were being pretty nice too!
Probably the most ticklish girl I've ever tickled was heavy, about 5'4, 240ish. Her feet were off the chart ticklish, couldn't even touch them. But because she had so many layers, I couldn't enjoy to tickle other parts that I enjoy to tickle on my thin lees, such as digging into and counting ribs, squeezing right above the know cap, digging into the collar bone. Please people, to each it's own, don't crucify me for my preference.
It's a simple matter of personal preference. I've had numerous sessions with heavy women and not being able to dig into ribs and squeeze the knees is a huge no no for me.
Not at all. Refer to the example that I gave.... equally ticklish bbw will be less responsive than the thin woman.
I'm not sure tickling "happens" anywhere .... It just seems to happen.Just because you don't like it and it doesn't work the way you would want it to doesn't mean the woman is less ticklish because she's bigger. I'm insanely ticklish on my ribs, especially in one particular spot, and I've never had anyone have any trouble finding it. Just about exactly this time last week I was tied to my bed going banana sandwich over somebody squeezing around my knees. We totally get that you have a preference, and no one has a problem with that. But your generalization is wrong. Biologically it just doesn't make sense. Tickling happens in your skin. Above muscle, above bone, above fat.
I'm pretty sure "kinda" worked its way of of the equation when he tried to defend digging as a standardized way of tickling when such a technique when in reality it creates a strict divide in people, being the ticklish reaction or the pain reaction. I recommend going with the lobster claw technique (thumb and middle finger squeezing together) as just an easier guage of sensitivity. Scratching, light squeezing, Spider tickling work better. Even with armpits I try to go Spider instead of digging.He just seems kinda prejudiced. That's okay.
Do not let the opinions of a couple of people get you down! Ticklish does NOT have a size!
You don't say? It couldn't be that it's called PORN, could it? That's fantasy land nonsense. It's on the same level as looking through an ikea catalogue to me. Fabricated ideas of superficial perfection.a ton of leading tickling companies that never even featured a bbw. I wonder why
Let's agree to disagree. God forbid I take a politically incorrect side to this. Last point, if bbw's were the preferred lee's by the majority, we'd certainly see a majority of lees being bbw in clips. However it's absolutely not the case, as I can name a ton of leading tickling companies that never even featured a bbw. I wonder why
It's a simple matter of personal preference. I've had numerous sessions with heavy women and not being able to dig into ribs and squeeze the knees is a huge no no for me.