Kalamos
Level of Lemon Feather
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2003
- Messages
- 12,968
- Points
- 63
Because, as Tyklfynd correctly said, some "peeps" post for the sake of posting, or maybe just to bump a friend's thread up.Umojar said:I also think it's wrong that people aren't allowed to post criticisms because they may seem too harsh. Kids aren't allowed here, so I don't get why people are so concerned with sparing people's feelings as if they're children. Everything should be open to all comments and if you can't handle that don't post.
And the funny deal is, if critique devolves into flame, you actually give weak artists even more exposure, missing the whole original point.
...
Then again, I don't like this kind of threads.
It makes ppl embarassed and jealous.
Just because ppl masturbate over these pics, it doesn't mean everybody is a sane and balanced adult.
That is why I would suggest avoiding the topic altogether.
...
If you really want to fight "cack" art hogging exposure, I would suggest something more subtle than all-out critique.
Bumping threads you like, instead.
Digging up older pics, so they get a new lease of life.
Anything, but fattening the reply count up with potential flame baiting.
Remember: flame is in the eye of the beholder.
No matter how tactful a critique is, somebody is gonna read it as: "my artist is better than your artist".
And we don't want that kind of nonsense.
...
Mark my words: you start telling ppl their stuff sucks - or could use some improvement, just to stay on the safe side of PC - and they or their friends, might get resentful.
They start imagining things, such as that funny idea about "elite artists" wanting to get the forum all for themselves.
Don't light the match unless you can run faster than the fuse is long.




