
Aren't the Powerpuff girls in like...Kindergarten? Doesn't the TMF have strict "no minor" rules? Shouldn't a moderator be aware of these rules?
__________________
<a href="http://s367.photobucket.com/albums/oo119/70drew70/?action=view¤t=DREW70-small.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo119/70drew70/DREW70-small.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>
<a href="http://drew70.thumblogger.com"><img src="http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo119/70drew70/drew70piano.gif" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a> <a href="http://s367.photobucket.com/albums/oo119/70drew70/?action=view¤t=3dancers.gif" target="_blank"><img src="http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo119/70drew70/3dancers.gif" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>
What I find interesting is that you are seeing this the exact, polar opposite of the way it should be percieved.
Instead of thinking, "Wow all of these moderators are wrong," you should be thinking "Since they all seem to think it's ok, it obviously is because, after all they're the ones in charge of knowing what's ok and what's not, so maybe I'm the stupid one here who isn't able to figure out something not that complicated."

Trust me Jeff. I'M not the one looking stupid right now.What I find interesting is that you are seeing this the exact, polar opposite of the way it should be percieved.
Instead of thinking, "Wow all of these moderators are wrong," you should be thinking "Since they all seem to think it's ok, it obviously is because, after all they're the ones in charge of knowing what's ok and what's not, so maybe I'm the stupid one here who isn't able to figure out something not that complicated."
Dave2112 said:Minors are not allowed on the TMF. In any way, shape or form. Period.
This is a fact which is beyond dispute. If you choose to overlook it because Bella is your friend, well that's your call.
__________________
Dave2112 said:I have heard the arguements/complaints that ageing minor characters is an inalienable right of free expression and that it doesn't hurt anyone. These arguements are not being dismissed, they are simply being disagreed with by the Administrators and Staff of this Forum. Here is why:
There is no way to enforce a No Minors rule, especially a Zero Tolerance one, if we allow this loophole to be exploited. We all agree that we do not want the TMF to become a place for pedophiles to go to see/read about kids getting tickled. However, if we take a 14-year-old character and allow him/her to be "aged" arbitrarily, we all know that people are still thinking of the character as they've become accustomed to them....a 14-year-old. The character has been drawn as a kid, been created as a kid and it's a very thin and weak stretch to just say "Oh, just imagine they're older." Now, we know that in the realms of fiction and artwork, there are no real people involved, but this is not the point and will not be debated. This is not the Supreme Court, this is a privately owned (and free to join) website with rules of its own that supercede people's rights of expression when those rights interfere with the overall mission of the site. We strive to allow people to express themselves however they want, but as in any civilised society, there must be limits.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not offended by it, and I agree it's funny. But rules are rules, are they not?
I hear the distant sounds of a thread implosion getting closer.......![]()
I don't think so; Drew won't be arguing in the thread anymore, and no one else is mean or petty enough to make a fuss over something everyone else is enjoying that 'is' within the rules 🙂