Caught a mis-post in the Tickling Forum concerning this thread. Pulled it, too. It concerned the kind of information that can be easily handled by reporting it to the Moderators. Needless to note, they (we) will receive it better when we're TOLD, instead of stumbling over such a greivance in the Tickling Discussion. It wasn't a Tickling Discussion. Best to send them to the Moderators.
As Scooby is already here, it's curious to me why you didn't continue to deal with Scoob. Clearly, he made the call on 'dog's doubts already.
Having read the posted thread, I don't find anything of consequence beyond said doubts. This is surprising? Some folks will doubt where they don't KNOW something to be true, ESPECIALLY where it seems fantastic. To folks reading here, that fine recount WILL seem fantastic, even when true.
Thus, some will doubt.
Never fear, brother. Many here will know better, and there's nothing to be done about those that don't. If they doubt, they doubt. Alas.
Scoob's gonna be the best call on this post, as this is Scoob's turf in this forum. Next time, might I suggest that you mail him, or select the "report a post" link, first?
In the mean time, were I you, I'd be grinnin'. After all, there's a minimal amount of folks that HAVE had the fortune of a casual tickle wit' anyone famous. It's a prize regardless of whether ANYONE believes it or not.
As my pal in Australia says, "Good on ya!" 'Dog's doubt should not lessen the fine event, and 'Dog is allowed to doubt. We all are. So are you.
Peace,
dvnc