Oh, it's DEFINITELY the thought that counts too much here...
Sorry, but to even advertise it that way, even if it's NOT really father-daughter, is still pretty messed up.
Again, yes, VERY irresponsible advertising in yet another manner,
not to mention downright disgusting.


I ignored the equivalent f/f (mother/daughter) that was mentioned, since I really dislike f/f to begin--
Cloudgazer's was a good point, however,
--it's inappropriate too, yuck, but that may not appear as sexually threatening at a glance (though perhaps it should, even if it's not nearly as common).
I'm mostly drawn to m/f, and I can hardly stand looking

at this insidious subject heading, forget the still pics,
-advertised here as a sort of incestuous (step?)father's dank wet dream.
Isn't the "Parent Thing" for some other shady site, somewhere far away with other pretend stepfamilies? Hopefully? There are definitely obviously sexual connotations throughout this fetish, this motif, this site --this thread,
so this (parent - "child") interaction is *really grotesque... however it may manifest itself...