Fettish updates (running thread)

[Sethalt2323]

If you know, do any of your models have husbands/boyfriends? (Those comfortable sharing)

 

[Boba_Fettish]

If you know, do any of your models have husbands/boyfriends? (Those comfortable sharing)

I think most do but I dont tend to ask and only find out if it comes up randomly. I dont like prying much, some people are really private, cant blame em.

 

[Sethalt2323]

I think most do but I dont tend to ask and only find out if it comes up randomly. I dont like prying much, some people are really private, cant blame em.

Ohhh gotcha gotcha. Can you name a few taken models that you remember?

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Ohhh gotcha gotcha. Can you name a few taken models that you remember?

Oh I couldn’t give out anyone’s personal info, sorry

 

[Sethalt2323]

Oh I couldn’t give out anyone’s personal info, sorry

No need to apologize! You're still goated dude 💯 can I dm you?

 

[Boba_Fettish]

No need to apologize! You're still goated dude 💯 can I dm you?

Sure thing 🙂

 

[Boba_Fettish]

The impact table - Ashleigh
Bastinado fans pay attention…

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Tickle Therapy - Zori and Lee Von Lux

New set of stocks made here at the lab, they’re tested on Zori who is given the ultimate challenge to try not to laugh!

 

[brot20008]

The impact table - Ashleigh
Bastinado fans pay attention…

👀

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Tickle Therapy - Baby Rae on the v2

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Newest vengeance out now - Whitney Morgan tickles me until I tap out.

Twice. I’m not certain I’d subject myself to this again.

 

[Sethalt2323]

Newest vengeance out now - Whitney Morgan tickles me until I tap out.

Twice. I’m not certain I’d subject myself to this again.

We need some more F/M lickling haha

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Tickled in Steel - Charmie and Ditria

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Ok so ‘lickling’ is awful, depending on the technique. Ama KNOWS what shes doing and i knew it instantly.

Latest vengeance out now.

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Newest Jokers Throne with Lithie, out meow!

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Tickle Table v2 Structural Integrity Assessment



Subject: Charmie (Specimen #273-FF) | Age: 27 | Physique: Fitness Model
Primary Vulnerable Zones: Underarms, Bare Feet (Plantar Surface), Palms, Sides, Neck, Lower Abdomen
Restraint System: Steel-Shanked Leather Sheaths (Limbs), Lynchpin-Anchored Steel Foot Casings, Ratcheted Toe Flexion


Abstract


This study evaluates the structural efficacy of the Tickle Table v2 under maximum stress conditions. Subject Charmie was immobilized via multi-point restraints to assess:

1. Resistance to kinetic strain during prolonged, high-intensity tickling.
2. Accessibility of deep-tickle receptor zones under total exposure.
3. Psycho-physiological limits of the specimen under sensory overload.

Methodology


Apparatus

• Tickle Table v2: Reinforced steel frame, leather straps with titanium buckles.
• Limb Immobilization:
  • Arms: Overhead steel-shanked sheaths (palms supinated, fingers tendon-tied).
  • Legs: Full-leg leather sheaths + lynchpin-secured steel foot casings.
  • Toes: Ratcheted nylon cord system (maximal metatarsal flexion).

Stimuli Application

• Dual experimenters (Fettishlabs Lead + Coexperimenter Ditria) applied synchronous, asymmetric stimuli across all zones at random intervals. Intensity escalated via variable pressure and rhythmic unpredictability.

Results


Physical Metrics

• Table Integrity: Zero structural compromise at 120 dB vocal peak (specimen’s peak amplitude). Lynchpins resisted 98 kgf of torque from plantar spasms.
• Subject Response:
  • Sweat-induced lubrication reduced epidermal resistance to stimuli by 63%.
  • Staccato laughter during sole/arch hyperstimulation.

"Her soles were a roadmap of twitches. Every nerve fired like a live wire"
– Fettishlabs Lead Experimenter











Discussion


The Tickle Table v2 exceeds operational thresholds for extreme interrogation scenarios. Key findings:

1. Palmar Vulnerability: Tendon-tying enabled uninterrupted thenar eminence access, inducing reflexive grip failure.
2. Dynamic Partner Synergy: Ditria’s switch methodology (abrupt pressure shifts) amplified specimen vocal distortion by 72%.
3. Structural Recommendation:
   • Augment toe-ratchet tensile strength to prevent metacarpal fatigue.
   • Add lateral ankle clamps to counter hip-thrusting.

Conclusion: Specimen Charmie’s biochemical stress markers confirm the apparatus’s dominance efficacy. Prolonged exposure risks sensory shutdown – ideal for edge-play applications.

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Role Reversal Dynamics in Self-Identified Submissives — A Case Study in Controlled Tickle Domination


Title:


"When the Ticklee Becomes the Tyrant: Exploring Latent Sadism in Self-Described Submissives During Role Reversal — A Case Study of Honey Kinkaid and Ama Rio"

• Setting: FetishLabs Research Chamber, Tickle Table v2
• Specimens:
  • Honey Kinkaid: Self-identified 95% ticklee (lee), 5% tickler (ler) — handed full control
  • Ama Rio: Highly sensitive submissive, extreme foot ticklishness, restrained and gagged
  • Derek (Lab Director/Lead Experimenter):Observer, authority figure, facilitator of power transfer
• Duration: 12 minutes of active tickle exposure
• Filming Requirements:
  • Full-body coverage with tight leather strapping (non-nude but high tension)
  • Close-up camera angles on Ama’s bound feet, toes pulled back in ratchet system
  • Angled observational shot of Tickle Table v2 for spatial dominance visualization
  • Audio focus on muffled begging, breath spikes, and emotional vocalizations
  • Separate post-scene verification video: safety check, aftercare, pupil response, hydration

Hypothesis & Research Questions

1. Does long-term submission to intense tickle stimulation cultivate a latent capacity for cruelty when role-reversed?
2. Is the aggression observed in Honey Kinkaid a product of learned technique from prior torment, or pent-up dominance finally released?
3. Can a self-described "extreme lee" (ticklish subject) exhibit sadistic precision when granted unchecked authority?

Observational Findings

1. Power Transfer Dynamics
   • Upon receiving control, Honey did not hesitate — immediate tactile assessment of Ama’s immobilized feet while in dominant reverse full mount position
   • Initiated with slow, deliberate finger strokes along the arches, escalating to rapid multi-fingered assault within 90 seconds
   • Used mirroring techniques — methods previously used on her during past sessions — now weaponized against Ama
2. Psychological Dominance
   • Offered Ama a sadistic choice: “Pick your time. Or I will.”
   • When Ama stalled, Honey began to gag her, inducing compliance — demonstrating understanding of psychological thresholding
   • Maintained eye contact throughout, smirking, taunting.
3. Escalation & Technique
   • Applied alternating tools: Fingertips, Terrorizer gloves with full palm and finger application technique, and Sphere exposure.
   • Targeted high-sensitivity zones: ball of foot, base of toes, inner arch — avoiding desensitization
   • Coaxed through Ama’s muffled screams to see tears or she wasnt stopping.
   • Honey laughed when Ama’s suffering continued to escalate.
4. Observer Notes (Derek)
   • “Rarely have I seen a switch so absolute. Honey wasn’t just playing dominant — she became it.”
   • “Her precision was clinical… as if she had rehearsed this exact moment in her mind for years.”
   • “I considered halting. But Honey’s control… it was terrifying. Perfect. Uncompromising.”

Post-Scene Safety & Verification

• Physical Check: No bruising, circulation intact, pupil response normal
• Emotional State: Ama emerged with a tear to be wiped away but coherent, confirmed consent retroactively: “I’m never letting that beautiful lady tickle me again.”
• Honey’s State: Calm, centered, slightly breathless — and giggling.
• Both participants passed 24-hour wellness follow-up

Analysis & Interpretation

• Not Just Revenge — It’s Recall
  Honey did not merely “get back” at the dynamic — she replicated it with near-surgical accuracy. This suggests procedural memory of submission, where the body and mind retain not only the sensation of suffering but the structure of control.
• The 5% That Rules 95%
  Her self-rating of 95% lee may reflect frequency, not capacity. Under stress, the 5% ler emerged not as a switch, but as a dormant predator — one who had studied her captors closely and waited.
• Is This Power Release… or Power Reclamation?
  This was not a tantrum. It was orchestrated mastery.
  • She used time as a weapon
  • She weaponized silence
  • She turned empathy into cruelty — knowing exactly how it felt, she made it worse
• This implies a dangerous truth: the most effective dominants may be those who have suffered the most.

Conclusion


Honey Kinkaid’s performance challenges the assumption that self-identified submissives lack the psychological architecture for cruelty. Instead, we observe a hyper-competent, emotionally intelligent sadism born not from absence of empathy — but from excessive familiarity with suffering.


This case suggests that in tickle-based power dynamics, the line between victim and executioner is not just thin — it’s taught to be crossed.

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Tickle Therapy - Ama Rio and Honey Kinkaid

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Title: "Dominance Reversed: Observational Study on Anticipatory Cruelty in a Natural Sadist (Kylie Moone) During Controlled Tickling Dominance Over a High-Sensitivity Submissive - Switch (Mia Hope)"


Abstract:


This experimental study investigates the behavioral transformation of Kylie Moone, a self-identified dominant with intense aversion to tickling and submission, when placed in a position of absolute control over a restrained, highly ticklish subject, Mia Hope. Conducted at Fettishlabs, the session utilized the Carbonitickle device—a full-body vacuum latex restraint exposing only head and feet—to maximize tactile transmission during remote stimulation. The hypothesis posits that Moone’s personal aversion around helplessness and tickling would either inhibit cruelty (empathy-by-projection) or amplify it (retaliatory dominance). Results indicate extreme punitive escalation, suggesting that experiential aversion fuels sadistic precision when power is reclaimed.


Methodology


Subjects:

• Subject A: Kylie Moone
  • Age: 28 | Gender: Female | Role: Dominant Volunteer
  • Known for: Strong assertive demeanor, vocal disdain for restraints, hypersensitivity to foot and armpit tickling
  • Psychological Profile: Type-A control needs, self-labeled “anti-sub,” history of resisting participation unless incentivized
• Subject B: Mia Hope
  • Age: 26 | Gender: Female | Role: Passive Test Specimen
  • Known for: Extreme full-body ticklishness, high pain-threshold but low tickle endurance, frequent submission to experimental protocols
  • Sensitivity Mapping: Feet ( ++++ ), ribs ( +++ ), inner thighs ( +++ ), neck ( ++++ )

Equipment:

• Carbonitickle Device: Full-body black latex vacuum mold. Once sealed, negative pressure ensures total skin contact with inner surface, conducting vibrations systemically.
• Stimulation Tools:
  • Bad Vibrations – Broad-surface silicone-tipped vibrator (low/high settings)
  • STickle Wand – Dual-pronged precision wand, ideal for concentrated nerve zones (feet, underarms, hips)

Procedure:

1. Restraint Protocol: Mia Hope was undressed, lubricated, and slowly drawn into the Carbonitickle chamber via vacuum suction. Her limbs were extended, torso compressed gently but firmly. Head and feet protruded. Latex clamped tightly around neck and ankle orifices.
2. Control Transfer: Kylie Moone was granted full operational authority over both devices, with real-time feedback displays showing Mia’s heart rate, laughter duration, and verbal resistance levels.
3. Experimental Phases:
   • Phase 1: Baseline tickling (automated, low intensity) to establish Mia’s response profile
   • Phase 2: Kylie’s freeform session (no restrictions, 45 minutes duration)
   • Phase 3: Exit interview with both parties post-release

Observational Findings


Behavioral Shift in Kylie Moone:

• Initial hesitation observed pre-recording, followed by a voracious grin.
• First act: immediate activation of Bad Vibrations on Mia’s ribs.
• Verbal dominance established: “Mommy likes”, “I love playing with my toy”
• Progression: Shifted to STickle on inner thigh via external conduction. Despite no direct contact, Mia convulsed in systemic spasms, laughter turning to high-pitched shrieks.
• Sadistic Innovation: Kylie modulated frequencies in rhythmic pulses, mimicking unorthodox cadence — on/off cycles designed to prevent adaptation.

Physiological Response in Mia Hope:

• Heart rate peaked at 168 bpm during dual-device overlap (STickle, Bad Vibrations in tandem)
• Vocalizations: 87% laughter, 10% pleading, 3% unintelligible squeals
• Muscular contractions registered via EMG: sustained tremors in abdominal, gluteal, and plantar regions

Critical Observation:


Kylie did not exhibit mercy. Instead, her personal aversion to tickling manifested as enhanced cruelty. Knowledge of helplessness was weaponized. Every tool use demonstrated precision targeting of zones she herself detests, suggesting projected revenge through domination.


Conclusion:


Contrary to empathy-based prediction, Kylie Moone’s history of resistance and sensitivity amplified her sadistic tendencies when placed in control. Her actions were not random but strategically punitive, utilizing systemic vibration to simulate the very helplessness she abhors — now applied upon another. The Carbonitickle device proved effective in amplifying both sensation and psychological subjugation.


This suggests that natural-born dominants with submissive trauma may develop hyper-efficient torture techniques, not out of ignorance, but because they remember the feeling — and seek to replicate it with perfection.


Recommendation:


Further studies warranted on:

• Neurological imaging during role reversal in dominants with submissive sensitivities
• Long-term behavioral shifts after repeated control exposure
• Use of tactile-conductive restraints in dominance conditioning

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Fetcon days 1 and 2.

Exhausted and one day to go.

3 amateurs, Fae DeCay, Zoey Ziptie, Maleka, Raven Lynette, Bri Olivia, Kacie James, Ivee Marks, Parker Skyes - so far so good!

I don’t think I ever tire of tickling, what can I say.

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Drop dead gorgeous soles on Maleka who took 2 years to consider doing a no Safeword - with every minute!
More trivia: her first wraparound tapegag ever - thanks for trusting me!

Day 3.

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Annnnd day 3

Lil Missy UK, Charmie, Captured Kerry!

 

[Boba_Fettish]

No Safeword - Maleka

Abstract


This study examines the physiological and psychological effects of anticipatory anxiety in an immobilized, no-safeword tickling scenario. Subject Maleka (32F), a lab associate with hyper-sensitive soles, underwent 15 minutes of relentless stimulation after a 2-year hesitation period. Key findings include: humor as a coping mechanism pre-trial, amplified dread via psychological narration, and paradoxical post-session willingness to repeat the experience

 

[Boba_Fettish]

The Terror Table- Lil Missy UK

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Newest vengeance out now, with Alicia Justine!