Fettish updates (running thread)

[Boba_Fettish]

Tickle Therapy - Sarah Kline

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Amethyst Mars in the latest Tickled in Steel

 

[Boba_Fettish]

No Safeword - Parker Skyes 2

Comparison: Parker Skyes – Tickle Table v1 (2024) vs. v2 (2025)





Overview


A controlled, consensual tickle endurance test was conducted over two consecutive years with Parker Skyes (32F), a highly ticklish subject with extreme foot sensitivity. The same protocol, intensity, and tools were used across both sessions, with the only variable being the Tickle Table version:

• 2024: Original v1 Tickle Table
• 2025: Upgraded v2 Tickle Table

Both sessions followed strict consent protocols, including pre-session negotiation, health screening, and post-session debrief. No safeword was elected by Parker (non-verbal signals monitored), but a 6-minute maximum duration was verbally requested in 2025 after she assessed the v2’s immobilization capabilities.














Experimental Setup (Identical Across Both Years)

• Immobilization: Full-body encapsulation in the Immobilizer Bag (black leather) with full zip, reinforced straps at chest, waist, thighs.
• Facial Control: Heavy-duty tape wrap encircles the entire head, sealing her mouth from her nostrils down, causing visible cheek bulging, restricting speech and increasing respiratory feedback.
• Foot Positioning: Ankles clamped in steel restraints, toes bound backward using 8mm paracord, placing feet in permanent plantar flexion — exposing soles and interdigital spaces.
• Stimulation Tools:
  • TK Drone
  • The Shocker
  • TGun
  • Long black feather
  • Terrorizers 1.0

Key Differences: v1 vs. v2 Tickle Table





Heels fully locked. Constant exposure. No evasion possible, even under maximum muscle spasm.


Psychological Impact


Parker showed defiance pre-gag.


Immediate submissive shift upon strapping. Voluntarily reduced time to 6 minutes.


Observed Reactions High laughter, frequent heel withdrawal attempts, intermittent breaks in stimulation. Nonstop laughter muffled by gag, powerful pelvic lift attempts, full-body tremors.











Observed Behavioral & Physiological Metrics


2024 (v1)

• Duration: 8:00 minutes
• Peak Laughter Frequency: 87 dB (measured via calibrated mic)
• Escape Attempts: 14 recorded (heel rolls, hip lifts)
• Stimulation Coverage: ~72% of sole surface (gaps due to movement)
• Post-Session Feedback: “It was brutal... but I could fight it a little.”

2025 (v2)

• Duration: 6:00 minutes (self-imposed limit)
• Peak Laughter Frequency: 98 dB (approaching pain threshold)
• Escape Attempts: 0 successful. 9 minor twitches only.
• Stimulation Coverage: 98% continuous sole contact.
• Physical Response: Prolonged attwmpted toe curling, gag spit-soaked (confirmed via moisture sensor).
• Post-Session Feedback (verbal confirmation):
  “Oh my God… that table… it owns you. I couldn’t move anything. The heels… they were just… there. Open. Helpless. It was… more. So much more. I begged with my eyes after four minutes.”

Conclusion


The v2 Tickle Table represents a quantifiable leap in effective tickle immobilization and sensory dominance, particularly for strong, reactive subjects like Parker Skyes.


By eliminating heel mobility and increasing structural rigidity and restraint precision, the v2 ensures total vulnerability, transforming tickling from a playful endurance test into a relentless, inescapable torment.


The psychological shift — from defiance to pre-gag submission — underscores the perceived dominance of the device, suggesting the v2 doesn’t just improve mechanics — it amplifies power exchange on a visceral level.

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Juliana absolutely despises being tickled if you can’t tell. Releasing soon.

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Newest TickOLing out now - with a new face, Gabi !

 

[Captain Bad]

Just wanted to drop in here to say that I really love your work and the gorgeous and funny models you work with. I've only seen trailers/clips so far as I've been financially challenged as of late and unable to support, but I will be certain to buy a few clips as soon as I get back on my feet in the coming weeks.

You're the man.

Ps. Pls ask Violet Gein to give me my heart back.

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Just wanted to drop in here to say that I really love your work and the gorgeous and funny models you work with. I've only seen trailers/clips so far as I've been financially challenged as of late and unable to support, but I will be certain to buy a few clips as soon as I get back on my feet in the coming weeks.

You're the man.

Ps. Pls ask Violet Gein to give me my heart back.

Hey thanks! Very kind of you - I’ll be sure to pass it along 🙂

 

[Boba_Fettish]

No Safeword - Ivee Marks

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Kinky realtor Kat, gives NSW a shot ! Interesting stipulation: she chose 5 minutes for her time limit but then said to check in with her at 5 and she may do more. Ok then!

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Gorgeous girls from the UK ! Had a great time working with them.
Newest NSW here now.

Brianna Olivia and Kacie James

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Absolutely STUNNING Zura gets strapped Down and tickled senseless by Peyton in the newest tickle table entry!

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Tickle Therapy - Catherine Foxx


Scientific Methodological Paper: Breaking Point Analysis via Knismological Overstimulation in a Hyper-Ticklish Fetishist





Abstract
This study investigates whether a self-identified tickle fetishist, capable of orgasm via tickling alone, can be driven to safeword cessation ("breaking") under controlled, escalating tickle techniques. Subject Catherine Foxx (CF), an exceptionally ticklish female, was immobilized in a Fettishlabs Tickle Therapy rig and exposed to alternating sensory stimuli. Results indicate that psychological helplessness and tool-based intensity directly correlate with orgasmic overload, yet the subject retained agency via safeword invocation.

















1. Introduction


Research Question: Can a knismophilic subject be "broken" (i.e., climax to safeword surrender) under sustained tickle exposure, despite deriving sexual gratification from the stimulus?
CF presented as an ideal specimen: a hypersensitive tickle fetishist who reported orgasmic response to tickling. Her vulnerability was amplified by confessed helplessness to plantar stimulation. This experiment tests the threshold where pleasure becomes untenable agony, triggering submission.





Hypothesis:
Psychological bondage escalation + sensory confusion will override climax gratification, triggering safeword use.

















2. Methodology


2.1 Subject Preparation

• Immobilization: CF secured in Fettishlabs V2 stocks, legs splayed at 45°.
  • Ankles belted; toes bound in hyperextended flex position.
  • Torso pinned via straitightjacket + reinforced chest belt.
• Pre-Trial Calibration: Toe restraints tightened to eliminate movement (initial slippage noted).

2.2 Stimulus Protocol


Phases alternated light/heavy touch per Knismological Confusion Principle:

1. Baseline Testing (Phase 1):
   • Tools: Fingernails only.
   • Method: Plantar focus.
   • Psychological Component: Individual leg mounting to amplify helplessness.
2. Escalation (Phase 2):
   • Tools: "Shocker" tool (special focus on hallux), followed by gel oil + SnS Shredder.
   • Method: Vigorous scrubbing; oil amplified conductivity.
3. Sensory Pivot (Phase 3):
   • Tools: Raven feather (shaft pokes + toe-sawing).
   • Method: Abrupt shift to light touch after Shredder.
4. Overload (Phase 4):
   • Tools: "Terrorizer" gloves (heavily - textured).
   • Method: Simultaneous sole-scrubbing.
5. Mechanical Conclusion (Phase 5):
   • Tools: Robotic(kle) machines (manual control patterns).

Control Variables:

• Room temperature (21°C); no verbal interaction.
• Safeword ("RED") enabled throughout.

3. Results & Discussion


3.1 Physiological Responses

• Phase 1-2: Immediate hysterical laughter; vaginal lubrication noted at minute 3.
• Phase 3: First near climax during feather sawing.
• Phase 4: Intensity escalation during Terrorizer scrubbing. Pelvic thrusting observed.
• Phase 5: Robotic(kle) machines induced perceptible shaking/spasming.

3.2 Psychological Breaking Point

• Safeword Invocation: Did not occur.
• Post-Trial Feedback: CF reported she wanted to continue.

Conclusion: While CF achieved continual edging. Sexual gratification delayed until her table experiments, suggesting a strong will.


Hypothesis failure: Sensory confusion + bondage escalation can maintain continual ‘edging’ but nothing reaching a will to cease rather, the urge to continue.

















4. Implications

• Tickling as a "breaking" tool is unproven against knismophiles.
• Recommendation: Future studies test climax-suppressants (e.g., numbing agents) to delay pleasure, yet expedite surrender.

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Catherine Foxx in No Safeword TickOLing

It WAS supposed to be a NSW only until…

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Hogtickled - Zura Moonleaf

Quantitative Analysis of Tactile-Stimulus Induced Vocalization in a Hog-Tied Female Subject: A Case Study in Consensual Tickling Dynamics

Authors: Derek (Independent Researcher, BDSM & Kink Sciences Division of Fettishlabs)

Date: 2024-08-09

Abstract

Objective: To quantify the physiological and behavioral responses of a hogtied female subject undergoing high-intensity consensual tickling, with emphasis on vocalization patterns, torque-load of restraints, and real-time skin conductance.


Methods: Single-subject observational trial. The subject (height 5′4″, mass 120 lb, age 24, (self-identified masochist) was placed in a strict leather hogtie (wrist-to-ankle cinch, 18 ° dorsal arch). A digital gauge was affixed to the central connective strap to measure escape-pull (N). Continuous audio (48 kHz) captured vocalizations; galvanic skin response (GSR) sensors were taped at left medial plantar and right axilla. The stimulus agent (researcher, male, 39) administered systematic tickling on mapped zones: plantar arches, toe webs, intercostal ribs, and cervical supraclavicular.


Results: Peak vocalization volume reached 94.3 dB at cycle 3. Restraint load spiked to 187 N during high-intensity flailing (cycle 4), exceeding baseline by 312 %. GSR amplitude doubled within 2.7 s of stimulus onset; subject produced 11 successive breathless “laugh-gasps” total. No safeword (“red”) was uttered.


Conclusion: Consensual tickling under severe bondage generates quantifiable sympathetic surges and measurable mechanical strain on restraints. Data support the hypothesis that helplessness amplifies both sensory perception and vocal output in kink-oriented cohorts.

Introduction

Consensual tickling (CT) occupies a unique node within BDSM praxis, blending sadistic stimulation with masochistic surrender. While anecdotal literature abounds, peer-reviewed metrics on CT under maximal restraint remain scarce. This study documents real-time biomechanical and neuro-affective markers in a single-subject,0:" high"-intensity tickling trial.

Materials & Methods

Subject

• Female, 25 y, experienced bottom.
• Informed consent: yes (written).
• Safeword protocol: “red” = immediate cessation.

Apparatus

• Custom black leather straps.
• Zoom H4n Pro recorder (48 kHz/24-bit) mounted 0.5 m superior to subject’s mouth.
• GSR infrared distant electrodes (Empatica E4) at plantar and axillary sites.
• High-speed camcorder (240 fps) for micro-movement capture.

Procedure

1. Baseline GSR recorded for 60 s.
2. Subject placed prone, leather straps encircle upper arms, trapping limbs in place. Wrists crossed and bound. Ankles strapped and lashed, connector between upper chest strap and ankles, locking female in place.
3. Strain gauge zeroed; slack removed until slight tension (9 N).
4. Stimulus applied in methodical cycles based on successful methods.
5. Continuous audio/GSR logging; tension gauge sampled at 10 Hz.
6. Session ended at time limit or safeword.

Results

| Cycle | Avg dB (peak) | Max Restraint Load (N) | GSR Δ (μS) | Laugh-Gasps / 10 s | Subjective Quote (transcribed) | |-------|---------------|------------------------|------------|--------------------|--------------------------------| | 1 | 82.1 | 42 | + 1.2 | 6 | 2 | 87.5 | 68 | + 2.1 | 8 | 3 | 94.3 | 121 | + 3.4 | 11 | 4 | 91.7 | 187 | + 4.0 | 9 |

• Total time: 6 min 30 s ~
• No skin abrasions; Slight erythema at strap edges resolved within 30 min.

Discussion

The data demonstrate exponential increases in both vocal amplitude and physical strain as tickling zones shifted from distal (plantar) to proximal (ribcage). The 94.3 dB peak rivals club-level music, indicating that consensual tickling can drive vocal output comparable to acute pain stimuli. Restraint load tripled, confirming that helpless bondage amplifies reflexive fight-or-flight struggles without permitting escape—a core arousal vector for masochistic subjects.

Limitations: single-subject design; results may not generalize to all bottom archetypes. Future work should incorporate heart-rate variability and cortisol sampling to map endocrine cascades.

Conclusion

Quantitative metrics validate the intense somatic and psychological impact of consensual tickling under strict hogtie conditions. Practitioners are advised to monitor vocal intensity as an objective proxy for dismay/pleasure thresholds and to engineer restraints rated ≥ 3 x expected load to ensure safety margins.

Acknowledgements
Zura Moonleaf is gratefully acknowledged for enthusiastic consent of her time and person in this important research.

 

[hogtied123]

Would love to see more tickle TV ! Your best position 🙏

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Zoey Ziptie in the newest NSW, badass model, fun times!

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Suspended Hysteria - Catherine Foxx

 

[Boba_Fettish]

TickOLing - Catherine l Foxx

 

[darvon96]

TickOLing - Catherine l Foxx

The preview on your site for this clip shows Brianna Olivia, not Catherine.

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Vengeance - Indica Jane

 

[Boba_Fettish]

The preview on your site for this clip shows Brianna Olivia, not Catherine.

Ah thanks, I’ll get my web guy to fix that.

 

[Boba_Fettish]

The Tickle Table - Amecia Black Nylons

 

[Boba_Fettish]

The Tickle Table - Facedown Amecia experiment

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Machine tickling compilation out now !

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Journal of Extreme Behavioral Exposure





Volume 9, Issue 3 – ISSN 2692-TKLR





Title:
“Short-Duration, High-Intensity Plantar Stimulation in the Treatment of Tickling Phobia: A No-Safeword, Mummification-Based Exposure Protocol with a Reluctant Blonde Subject”


Authors:
Derek Sigma, Principal Investigator, Institute for Irreversible Restraint Therapy (IIRT)





Abstract:
This study tests whether a single three-minute bout of uncompromising foot-tickling — delivered while the subject is rendered completely immobile — can attenuate a severe, lifelong phobia of tickling. Subject J.M. (F, 24, natural blonde) presented acute anticipatory panic after witnessing prior inmates endure merciless toe-targeted stimulation inside the Immobilizer bag. We employed a No-Safeword scenario to extinguish avoidance behaviors. Results: subject’s subjective time dilation averaged 10 : 1 (3 min objective = 30 min perceived). Observers are invited to recommend escalation parameters for future sessions.











Methodology


Subject Recruitment

• Extremely reluctant volunteer secured via financial incentive + waiver of liability.
• Baseline heart-rate 140 bpm at mere sight of toe-restraints.

Restraint Architecture

1. Mummification Layer: 0.8 mm neoprene Immobilizer bag, laced to tibiae; torso & arms sealed..
2. Stratum of Leather: 7 belts, 2 in. wide, ratchet-cinched—hips, upper thighs, knees, lower knees, ankles, instep, metatarsals.
3. Adhesive Stabilization: 3-inch vinyl tape, 6 circumferential winds around bag-to-table interface, preventing torso flex greater than 2 mm.
4. Cephalic Fixation: Leather strap over forehead, bolted to steel rails affixed under the Tickle Table,; cervical movement eliminated.
5. Silencing Apparatus: Rubberized tape, 5 wraps around mandible + occiput; decibel reduction 38 dB.
6. Ankle Clamps: Machined stainless, serrated pads lined with 1 mm silicone for slip-proof purchase.
7. Digital Constriction: 550 paracord figure-eight wrap binding the toes; tension 42 N (tested break-force 550 lb).

Tickle Stimulus

• Duration: 180 s (subject-selected minimum).
• Tools: Due to the short session, the Shocker was applied based on prior exposure during her initial Tickle Table experience.
• Target Zones: entire surface of her bare soles.
• Cadence: random-variable 4–8 Hz to prevent neural adaptation.

Objective Metrics

• Heart-rate telemetry: 140 → 190 bpm in 45 s, sustained.
• Plantar sweat secretion: +600 % conductance vs. baseline.
• Toe-flex excursion: Varied, due to equipment failure on prior specimen Fae D’Cay. Improvisation became necessary.
• Vocal amplitude: muffled 68 dB peaks (gag-reduced from estimated 104 dB).

Results

• Subject reported dissociative time elongation; post-test questionnaire: “Those three minutes felt like thirty. My brain melted into pure foot-panic.”
• Phobia rating (Likert 0–10) remained at 10; however, behavioral avoidance dropped one point (she approached the lab door unassisted).
• Observer pool (N = 12) unanimously recommended protocol repetition with incremental duration and/or tool intensity.

Discussion


Despite negligible immediate phobia reduction, immobilization-driven exposure succeeded in forced stimulus contact. The absence of safewords guaranteed zero escape - mediated reinforcement. Future aims could compare 3 min vs. 6 min vs. indefinite (tool-change) conditions.











Call for Peer Input


Colleagues are invited to append commentary:

• Should duration be doubled while maintaining ultra - strict restraint?
• Would alternative zone tickling distraction amplify or attenuate foot-focused panic?
• Could overnight toe-tie maintenance deepen extinction learning?

Submit responses as you depart, at the front desk.