Girlfriend mind If you tickle her friends?

[LoveSoles81]

Anyone have a wife or girlfrienfd that doesn't mind if you tickle her friends?
Mine seems pretty cool with it. I got to tickle her friend last night. She was kneeling in front of me with her soles facing me. I ran my fingers across both soles and she jumped and started laughing. my girlfriend says to her "he's a tickle freak"

 

[2ticklish4eva]

no

would hate the thought of my boyfriend tickling my friends as it means alot to me
but thats just my opinion

 

[Adam]

I really think it depends. Some people find tickling to be nothing more than a playful form of affection, while it's a sexual turn-on for others. If you're in the latter category, you should probably watch it around your girl's friends, particularly if she knows it's a sexual thing for you. Then again, some people are just really cool with whatever, and wouldn't give it a second thought. Interesting topic. 🙂

 

[LisVender]

I've been fortunate enough to get away with tickling the feet of my girlfriend's friends, because the opportunities were just too great and obvious. However, there is a guilt associated with it, because I'm not sure my girlfriend knows just how much I enjoy it. Even if it is a brief surrender to an irresistible compulsion, I feel a pang that gets to me.

 

[Amanda]

I would mind

 

[TickleGoddess06]

I'd mind, big time.

 

[wendynpeter]

I think most women who are invested in a realtionship with a tickle fetishist are going to see it as sexually touching their friend. Whether that bothers them is going to depend on the person, right? If your wife or girlfriend is into threesomes, it probably wouldn't matter to her at all! If she's not into flirting outside your relationship, then she's probably going to have a problem. Others, in between!

If you want to be free to tickle others, you'll have to find a woman who's cool with that -- looks like you did!! Congrats!

 

[Mz Chaos]

Well...
Speaking as a single, unattached 'Lee looking for a single, unattached 'Ler I would hope that should I finally find that special someone to share my life, my home and my fetish, that by the time we connected we would have gotten all of that out of our systems ("that" meaning playing the "tickling field").
I would also hope that my playfullness, willingness to try new things and love of adventure would be enough to satisfy my 'Ler into not feeling the compulsion to tickle other females and that his love of tickling and methods would be satisfying enough to me to not want to be tickled by any other 'Ler.

However...

I have found that folks are gonna do what folks are want to do and there's no stopping them once they have their mind set on doing it. And the way I look at it... if I'm not interesting enough to hold my 'Ler's attention... maybe it's best they look elsewhere for someone who is and allow both of us to find a more suitable person as a life and tickling partner.
I'm a "one man" kinda gal in all respects and I'm hoping the fella I find is a "one woman" kinda guy in the same manner.

So... after all the rambling... yeah... I'd mind it a hell of a lot if I wasn't the only woman in my guys life in every way, shape and form... tickling or otherwise.

I suppose I could have saved a lot of time if I'd have just said that to begin with.

 

[kis123]

Well...
Speaking as a single, unattached 'Lee looking for a single, unattached 'Ler I would hope that should I finally find that special someone to share my life, my home and my fetish, that by the time we connected we would have gotten all of that out of our systems ("that" meaning playing the "tickling field").
I would also hope that my playfullness, willingness to try new things and love of adventure would be enough to satisfy my 'Ler into not feeling the compulsion to tickle other females and that his love of tickling and methods would be satisfying enough to me to not want to be tickled by any other 'Ler.

However...

I have found that folks are gonna do what folks are want to do and there's no stopping them once they have their mind set on doing it. And the way I look at it... if I'm not interesting enough to hold my 'Ler's attention... maybe it's best they look elsewhere for someone who is and allow both of us to find a more suitable person as a life and tickling partner.
I'm a "one man" kinda gal in all respects and I'm hoping the fella I find is a "one woman" kinda guy in the same manner.

So... after all the rambling... yeah... I'd mind it a hell of a lot if I wasn't the only woman in my guys life in every way, shape and form... tickling or otherwise.

I suppose I could have saved a lot of time if I'd have just said that to begin with.

I couldn't agree more!

I should be enough to satisfy my man-he shouldn't have to go to others to get his needs met. Now would he be okay if I tickled his friends?? I'm inclined to say he might not. Hey, whatever's good for the goose..... 😉

 

[FeatherFeet]

honestly, I think that would be a little selfish if a girlfriend wouldnt let their boyfriend tickle anyone else.

I am aware that alot of people here consider tickling as completly sexual, and nothing else and are afraid to tickle their own children (despite how many parents worldwide do it) because of that, but alot of people don't take it sexually at all.

For myself, I take it as both sexual foreplay and very sexual turn on (when the tickling is with my partner) or as pure fun and jest and friendship when its a friend, ect.

If you're going to ban your partner frm tickling anyone else only because it turns you on, you gotta think on the flip side. Say that hugging a friend made your partner angry because a hug could be as sexual as tickling. People say "theres a difference" but there really isnt. A hug can be a sexual hug or it can be a friendship hug, the same as tickling can be a sexual thing ,or a playful thing. People need to do a better job of seperating the two. I know there are some who cant, but then again it would depend on the person.

If your boyfriend was able to keep the sexual part of it OUT of tickling your friends or his friends, then there is really no reason why you should attempt to stop him from doing so. Because in that case it has nothing to do with the girl "not being good enough" it has to do with the guy just having fun with his other friends. And VISA VERSA FOR THE GIRLS AS WELL. As in if your a guy who gets mad at your girlfriend tickling other guys, unless its done in a sexual fashion, thats just stupid. It also means that you don't trust your partner very much if a little thing like this could bother you.

I for one, seperate sexual tickling from fun tickling every day of my life. And I know it would be impossible for me to not tickle my friends just because my girlfriend didnt like it. Why? Because tickling in general is as much a part of my life as hugging my friends or wrestling with my friends or hell playing video games and watching movies with my friends. It's a fun activity that just happens to arouse people. (Including me) Though I can get past it. Now would that be worth blowing a whole relationship because this is how I act with my friends and always have? Would it be worth blowing a relationship if a girl thought I shouldnt hug any other girls? Or I shouldnt arm wrestle or watch tv with another girl because those things somehow turned her on? Honestly...I think the answer is pretty obvious.

 

[FeatherFeet]

Well...
Speaking as a single, unattached 'Lee looking for a single, unattached 'Ler I would hope that should I finally find that special someone to share my life, my home and my fetish, that by the time we connected we would have gotten all of that out of our systems ("that" meaning playing the "tickling field").
I would also hope that my playfullness, willingness to try new things and love of adventure would be enough to satisfy my 'Ler into not feeling the compulsion to tickle other females and that his love of tickling and methods would be satisfying enough to me to not want to be tickled by any other 'Ler.

However...

I have found that folks are gonna do what folks are want to do and there's no stopping them once they have their mind set on doing it. And the way I look at it... if I'm not interesting enough to hold my 'Ler's attention... maybe it's best they look elsewhere for someone who is and allow both of us to find a more suitable person as a life and tickling partner.
I'm a "one man" kinda gal in all respects and I'm hoping the fella I find is a "one woman" kinda guy in the same manner.

So... after all the rambling... yeah... I'd mind it a hell of a lot if I wasn't the only woman in my guys life in every way, shape and form... tickling or otherwise.

I suppose I could have saved a lot of time if I'd have just said that to begin with.

no offense meant here, but considering that part in bold....maybe thats the reason your single? You can't keep a guy from interatcing with other girls just because he has a girlfriend, that has major trust and major control freak issues written all over it right there.

 

[ReservedTickler]

my x did

My x did but I didn't mind because it bothers me if a girl i'm with tickles another guy and i say do unto others u know.

 

[Radiolightning]

hahaha... not if she knows you're into it

If she knows you actually are excited by it then she'd get put off and probably stop spending time with that friend... I'd strongly suggest you keep your hands in your pockets instead of in your pants. Think of it this way.. if you knew she thought one of your buddies was hot.. you'd probably not invite him over as often.

I never tell anyone it's a fetish of mine... really why bother? Tickling is fun and innocent, but once you label it something more it becomes something too intense for most people to handle. Just keep it light and keep it away from her friends...

 

[lojak]

Anyone have a wife or girlfrienfd that doesn't mind if you tickle her friends?
Mine seems pretty cool with it. I got to tickle her friend last night. She was kneeling in front of me with her soles facing me. I ran my fingers across both soles and she jumped and started laughing. my girlfriend says to her "he's a tickle freak"

GOD BLESS YOUR GF

 

[luvgirlsfeet]

i actually have tickled Kristin my sister-in-laws feet ( my wifes sister ) that was alot of fun 😛oke3:

 

[lojak]

GOD BLESS YOUR GF

Well...
Speaking as a single, unattached 'Lee looking for a single, unattached 'Ler I would hope that should I finally find that special someone to share my life, my home and my fetish, that by the time we connected we would have gotten all of that out of our systems ("that" meaning playing the "tickling field").
I would also hope that my playfullness, willingness to try new things and love of adventure would be enough to satisfy my 'Ler into not feeling the compulsion to tickle other females and that his love of tickling and methods would be satisfying enough to me to not want to be tickled by any other 'Ler.

However...

I have found that folks are gonna do what folks are want to do and there's no stopping them once they have their mind set on doing it. And the way I look at it... if I'm not interesting enough to hold my 'Ler's attention... maybe it's best they look elsewhere for someone who is and allow both of us to find a more suitable person as a life and tickling partner.
I'm a "one man" kinda gal in all respects and I'm hoping the fella I find is a "one woman" kinda guy in the same manner.

So... after all the rambling... yeah... I'd mind it a hell of a lot if I wasn't the only woman in my guys life in every way, shape and form... tickling or otherwise.

I suppose I could have saved a lot of time if I'd have just said that to begin with.

I’m' sorry i don't agree with the first part of your statement; because your ler want to tickle someone else doesn't mean that they are not faithful to you. Tickling is a passion that one person can not full no matter how ticklish they are, or how adventurous they want to be. It a deep desire to make people laugh also an overwhelming urges to find out if other people are ticklish and where.

My wife believes as you and now both of our lives is missing that spark (at least that how I look at it.) There’s only so much two can do alone before life becomes stale. I don’t mean having sex with out people it’s just tickling.

If your Ler profession was a masseuse and touches ladies all day would you have a problem with it? I know it’s their job, but still they’re touching other people all day.

 

[kis123]

honestly, I think that would be a little selfish if a girlfriend wouldnt let their boyfriend tickle anyone else.

I am aware that alot of people here consider tickling as completly sexual, and nothing else and are afraid to tickle their own children (despite how many parents worldwide do it) because of that, but alot of people don't take it sexually at all.

For myself, I take it as both sexual foreplay and very sexual turn on (when the tickling is with my partner) or as pure fun and jest and friendship when its a friend, ect.

If you're going to ban your partner frm tickling anyone else only because it turns you on, you gotta think on the flip side. Say that hugging a friend made your partner angry because a hug could be as sexual as tickling. People say "theres a difference" but there really isnt. A hug can be a sexual hug or it can be a friendship hug, the same as tickling can be a sexual thing ,or a playful thing. People need to do a better job of seperating the two. I know there are some who cant, but then again it would depend on the person.

If your boyfriend was able to keep the sexual part of it OUT of tickling your friends or his friends, then there is really no reason why you should attempt to stop him from doing so. Because in that case it has nothing to do with the girl "not being good enough" it has to do with the guy just having fun with his other friends. And VISA VERSA FOR THE GIRLS AS WELL. As in if your a guy who gets mad at your girlfriend tickling other guys, unless its done in a sexual fashion, thats just stupid. It also means that you don't trust your partner very much if a little thing like this could bother you.

I for one, seperate sexual tickling from fun tickling every day of my life. And I know it would be impossible for me to not tickle my friends just because my girlfriend didnt like it. Why? Because tickling in general is as much a part of my life as hugging my friends or wrestling with my friends or hell playing video games and watching movies with my friends. It's a fun activity that just happens to arouse people. (Including me) Though I can get past it. Now would that be worth blowing a whole relationship because this is how I act with my friends and always have? Would it be worth blowing a relationship if a girl thought I shouldnt hug any other girls? Or I shouldnt arm wrestle or watch tv with another girl because those things somehow turned her on? Honestly...I think the answer is pretty obvious.

Well, good for you-you're able to separate! Unfortunately, not everyone is able to do that and the ladies and gentlemen have the right to their feelings. I personally don't like the idea of sharing my man with anyone-women are shady these days and know a good man when they see one, let alone if he touches her. What if she likes his tickling too much and wants more? It has nightmare potential attached to it.

I might be more agreeable in a gathering setting where people aren't very local. Then I don't have to be concerned about inclandestine meetings behind my back. If she's local, I don't feel very comfortable about it.

You're probably thinking that I'm too possessive and don't trust my man. Well, I trust my SO more than I've trusted any man I've ever been with to date. I don't trust women and my stepmother taught me that. She and my mother were friends. She used their friendship to get next to my father and tear up my family. Than she had the nerve to hate me and my sisters as if we did something to her. The problem was that my father never got over my mother and would've gone back to her in a New York minute if my stepfather wasn't in the picture. So I have every reason in the world to keep my man and his hands to myself. Besides, I know his touch-it's extremely erotic to me and I'm sure it would be to another woman. Let her get her own man to tickle her and leave mine alone!

Isn't it funny that the men have no problems tickling other women, but the women have problems with their men tickling/touching other women. It's because we know how women can be out here. And no, I don't think every woman is a man-stealing slut waiting for an opportunity, but since I don't know who the man-stealing sluts are I'd rather not have my man out there, thank you very much.

 

[kis123]

I’m' sorry i don't agree with the first part of your statement; because your ler want to tickle someone else doesn't mean that they are not faithful to you. Tickling is a passion that one person can not full no matter how ticklish they are, or how adventurous they want to be. It a deep desire to make people laugh also an overwhelming urges to find out if other people are ticklish and where.

My wife believes as you and now both of our lives is missing that spark (at least that how I look at it.) There’s only so much two can do alone before life becomes stale. I don’t mean having sex with out people it’s just tickling.

If your Ler profession was a masseuse and touches ladies all day would you have a problem with it? I know it’s their job, but still they’re touching other people all day.

I don't think that's a good example-how about if the ler was a doctor or even a gynecologist? He studied for years and gets paid to touch women in places she'd prefer not to. But that's his job-now if he got off when he did it, I'd be concerned!

I have a tickling passion and my man fulfills it and then some so one person can fulfill that need. My issue with your statement is that you seem unhappy with being with one person. In marriage, that's pretty much what you signed up for-be creative and bring that spark back to your bedroom. It doesn't require you inviting others into your life-that might create a problem in the future (it might not, but you never know).

I'm sorry your marriage has gone "stale", but when you get married, you're supposed to be devoted to one spouse. That's what you signed up for. If you wanted to involve other "things" in your marriage, that's something you should've negotiated prior to the marriage. Your wife has the right to want her man to herself and not wanting his hands on another woman in a way that has potential to turn into something else.

 

[lojak]

I don't think that's a good example-how about if the ler was a doctor or even a gynecologist? He studied for years and gets paid to touch women in places she'd prefer not to. But that's his job-now if he got off when he did it, I'd be concerned!

I have a tickling passion and my man fulfills it and then some so one person can fulfill that need. My issue with your statement is that you seem unhappy with being with one person. In marriage, that's pretty much what you signed up for-be creative and bring that spark back to your bedroom. It doesn't require you inviting others into your life-that might create a problem in the future (it might not, but you never know).

I'm sorry your marriage has gone "stale", but when you get married, you're supposed to be devoted to one spouse. That's what you signed up for. If you wanted to involve other "things" in your marriage, that's something you should've negotiated prior to the marriage. Your wife has the right to want her man to herself and not wanting his hands on another woman in a way that has potential to turn into something else.

Kis
I never use a doctor or any medical field, i use masseuse which is someone that give massages they only study for a few months, how i know i'm planning on taking the class once i finish with my networking degree.

as for being with one person, i can't think of one marriage or long term relationship that haven’t gone stale from time to time, just like eating, you can only eat chicken so many ways before you get tire of it. but again it's just a example. as for my marriage we have our rough times and dead zone just like every marriage if they admit it or not but thank you for your concern it shows that you do care.

In closing, show me one written document other than the bible which has been re-translated so many times that the original meaning has been lost or changed to fit the religion using it.

In some countries taking of multiple wives is the custom, but for of the life of me I can’t understand why he would do that to himself. but we can continue this on the general side. I see you there.

 

[kis123]

Kis
I never use a doctor or any medical field, i use masseuse which is someone that give massages they only study for a few months, how i know i'm planning on taking the class once i finish with my networking degree.

as for being with one person, i can't think of one marriage or long term relationship that haven’t gone stale from time to time, just like eating, you can only eat chicken so many ways before you get tire of it. but again it's just a example. as for my marriage we have our rough times and dead zone just like every marriage if they admit it or not but thank you for your concern it shows that you do care.

In closing, show me one written document other than the bible which has been re-translated so many times that the original meaning has been lost or changed to fit the religion using it.

In some countries taking of multiple wives is the custom, but for of the life of me I can’t understand why he would do that to himself. but we can continue this on the general side. I see you there.

Any long-term relationship has it's "dead zone" from time to time. The couple should work on creating ways to spark things back, not inviting others into their play (that is unless the couple agrees to it). There are members of this forum who are polyamorous and have other loves-those were agreed upon prior to their marriages (at least I think so). That's their business anyway-I personally don't believe in the "one mate for life" principle; maybe the polyamorists see something many don't.

I don't understand the first paragraph of your last post. I used the doctor analogy because they touch women all day long and it sometimes it can produce an erotic response (believe me, I know what I'm talking about). He's just doing his job and his SO shouldn't have a problem with that. I just don't like the idea of my man tickling another woman unless it's in a gathering setting and she's not local. It can set up the scene for a lot of problems later on, IMO.

And what is your real motive behind the masseuse if you're studying networking? Are you trying to do the end-around behind your wife's back and use the massage career to get your way?

 

[Horatio]

My wife is now cool with it, but it took a few years for her to be comfortable enough. She realizes that, just because I like tickling other girls, doesn't mean I'm going to sleep with them or leave my wife for them. Kind of like going to the occasional strip club.

 

[LoveSoles81]

My wife is now cool with it, but it took a few years for her to be comfortable enough. She realizes that, just because I like tickling other girls, doesn't mean I'm going to sleep with them or leave my wife for them. Kind of like going to the occasional strip club.

Lol, thats a good point. For me we are pretty new in our relationship (7 months) and she is cool with it.

 

[FeatherFeet]

Well, good for you-you're able to separate! Unfortunately, not everyone is able to do that and the ladies and gentlemen have the right to their feelings. I personally don't like the idea of sharing my man with anyone-women are shady these days and know a good man when they see one, let alone if he touches her. What if she likes his tickling too much and wants more? It has nightmare potential attached to it.

I might be more agreeable in a gathering setting where people aren't very local. Then I don't have to be concerned about inclandestine meetings behind my back. If she's local, I don't feel very comfortable about it.

You're probably thinking that I'm too possessive and don't trust my man. Well, I trust my SO more than I've trusted any man I've ever been with to date. I don't trust women and my stepmother taught me that. She and my mother were friends. She used their friendship to get next to my father and tear up my family. Than she had the nerve to hate me and my sisters as if we did something to her. The problem was that my father never got over my mother and would've gone back to her in a New York minute if my stepfather wasn't in the picture. So I have every reason in the world to keep my man and his hands to myself. Besides, I know his touch-it's extremely erotic to me and I'm sure it would be to another woman. Let her get her own man to tickle her and leave mine alone!

Isn't it funny that the men have no problems tickling other women, but the women have problems with their men tickling/touching other women. It's because we know how women can be out here. And no, I don't think every woman is a man-stealing slut waiting for an opportunity, but since I don't know who the man-stealing sluts are I'd rather not have my man out there, thank you very much.

thats a very weird view then, which you are taking special applications to tickling only because of what it means for you. according to your theory that would mean your man should never touch any other woman he's not related to in any fashion whatsoever including friendly hugging and what not. So that theory doesnt work.

The other possibilitiy "i only think that way with tickling" becausen then you are just saying "because its this way to me, no one else can take part in it" when for fact is most people take it as nothing more than fun. so in those terms, if you got off on hugging like i said, he could never hug anyone? Or if you got off on handshaking that means he'd never be able to shake hands with anyone else? Again, that theory doesnt work because your depriving someone of a normal life experience only because of how it affects you. and thats selfish.

Either view, its selfish when you break it down. I don't care how many girls or guys agree with it. Obviously people have selfish impulses, but when its done in bulk like this is when excuses and reasoning that is cheap and second hand can make people look like selfishness is fine. In this case, because of the amount of people who agree with that selfish "ONLY ME ONLY MINE" terms with something that is to most people not a sexual and in no way a possessive thing you can control, it makes it look ok. However, take away all those who agree with it, and break it down, and despite the reasons it is still overly possesive and controlling and selfish for no reason other than your own insecurities. Get over it, grow up. The world doesnt revovle around you people and your man (or woman) doesnt have to stop their normal life with other people just because they are with you.

(again, this is all assuming the man can seperate the sexual from the non sexual tickling. if he cant...then yeah, balls to him.)

 

[kis123]

thats a very weird view then, which you are taking special applications to tickling only because of what it means for you. according to your theory that would mean your man should never touch any other woman he's not related to in any fashion whatsoever including friendly hugging and what not. So that theory doesnt work.

The other possibilitiy "i only think that way with tickling" becausen then you are just saying "because its this way to me, no one else can take part in it" when for fact is most people take it as nothing more than fun. so in those terms, if you got off on hugging like i said, he could never hug anyone? Or if you got off on handshaking that means he'd never be able to shake hands with anyone else? Again, that theory doesnt work because your depriving someone of a normal life experience only because of how it affects you. and thats selfish.

Either view, its selfish when you break it down. I don't care how many girls or guys agree with it. Obviously people have selfish impulses, but when its done in bulk like this is when excuses and reasoning that is cheap and second hand can make people look like selfishness is fine. In this case, because of the amount of people who agree with that selfish "ONLY ME ONLY MINE" terms with something that is to most people not a sexual and in no way a possessive thing you can control, it makes it look ok. However, take away all those who agree with it, and break it down, and despite the reasons it is still overly possesive and controlling and selfish for no reason other than your own insecurities. Get over it, grow up. The world doesnt revovle around you people and your man (or woman) doesnt have to stop their normal life with other people just because they are with you.

(again, this is all assuming the man can seperate the sexual from the non sexual tickling. if he cant...then yeah, balls to him.)

If he wants to stay with me, he keeps his hands off other women and I'll keep my hands off other men....period, end of story! I doesn't matter if you find my views selfish or not, they're my views and I stand by them 1000%!

As I said before, only if it's in a gathering and the female is not local woud I want my man tickling another woman period! And my world DOES revolve around me and my man, it's called a RELATIONSHIP! And last I checked, relationships are self-centered (with the two people being considered 1 self). I see nothing wrong with it so it's time to agree to disagree. Would you want your wife or SO tickling other men if you're using it in the bedroom? What if the guy really liked what she did and wanted more? Would it be okay then??

 

[LoveSoles81]

If he wants to stay with me, he keeps his hands off other women and I'll keep my hands off other men....period, end of story! I doesn't matter if you find my views selfish or not, they're my views and I stand by them 1000%!

As I said before, only if it's in a gathering and the female is not local woud I want my man tickling another woman period! And my world DOES revolve around me and my man, it's called a RELATIONSHIP! And last I checked, relationships are self-centered (with the two people being considered 1 self). I see nothing wrong with it so it's time to agree to disagree. Would you want your wife or SO tickling other men if you're using it in the bedroom? What if the guy really liked what she did and wanted more? Would it be okay then??

My Ex girlfriend was like that. She didn't want me tickling other girls. Thats not why we broke up, but even though I tickled other girls. It didn't meen I wanted to sleep with them.