-
If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread -
The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us. -
>>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
Don't forget to include your username
Hillary Duff Tickle News+Real life tickle!!!!
BigNorm
3rd Level Violet Feather
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2002
- Messages
- 7,689
- Points
- 0
Goofytickle said:
seems like someone's in touch with their feminine side 🙄 🙄
i mean jump down my throat and try to piss me off will ya.
i simply meant that most guys seem to do that. i understand if you are more in control with your hormones like me, i don't go staring at every breast that happens accross my field of view. i know what you mean, that sometimes it feels wrong to think dirty thoughts about a woman.
i've tried to be nice and explain it the best i could. but for the love of god, stop trying to troll or whatever and stop trying to piss me off.
MistressValerie1
Administrator
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2003
- Messages
- 8,729
- Points
- 0
The level of hostility in this thread needs to be toned down. Please think carefully about how others will perceive what you write, and remember that the readers cannot see your facial expression or hear your tone of voice.
http://www.tickletheater.com/index.php?page=rulesRules said:
Big Norm. I am not trying to attack you, I am just arguing the topics you've prevented.
Kalamos: I don't believe masterbating is wrong. I do believe, checking out random girls and masterbating about THEM is wrong. Watch a porno, pick up a playboy. Look at something where you know the person is okay with you thinking those thoughts about them.
MistressValerie: Sorry, I just get passionate when people upset me =/. and the actions of the people i've stated in here, have done just that.
Kalamos: I don't believe masterbating is wrong. I do believe, checking out random girls and masterbating about THEM is wrong. Watch a porno, pick up a playboy. Look at something where you know the person is okay with you thinking those thoughts about them.
MistressValerie: Sorry, I just get passionate when people upset me =/. and the actions of the people i've stated in here, have done just that.
taragohn
TMF Expert
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2003
- Messages
- 514
- Points
- 0
Since when do we have to keep in mind the other persons feelings when we THINK of something? Like Kalamos said earlier it is "dreaming". Nothing wrong with dreaming of something how perverted it may seem to others as long as you keep it to yourself and do not force it onto others.
Goofytickle said:
ROFL.....Goofy, I'd say that you are probably in the 1% of the male population by thinking that you should only masturbate to established porn. Dude, men are men. To some degree, the average man is a horndog. Now I'm not saying it is ok to go up to a stranger and do the things that this thread originally addressed, but to tell men, especially here (hehe) that it's wrong to "dream" about anyone other than a female representative of the porn industry, is like, I believe, the story of Don Quixote, who tries to fight off the oppressive ocean waves with a sword. Noble, but futile and a little crazy 😛 But, I've said it already, I agree with the idea that it's never ok to assault anyone for any reason....fetish included.
Kalamos
Level of Lemon Feather
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2003
- Messages
- 12,921
- Points
- 63
Assaulting is a thing.
Dreaming is a completely different matter altogether.
People have filters: they normally won't act they fantasies out.
And dreaming alone does not make things happen.
An evil eye is not a smack in the nogging, yet.
And a lustful gaze, however creepy, is not rape either.
We cannot punish thought alone.
We punish facts, not dreams.
We are not the Thought Police.
Dreaming is a completely different matter altogether.
People have filters: they normally won't act they fantasies out.
And dreaming alone does not make things happen.
An evil eye is not a smack in the nogging, yet.
And a lustful gaze, however creepy, is not rape either.
We cannot punish thought alone.
We punish facts, not dreams.
We are not the Thought Police.
Big Norm: Sorry, I meant presented, not prevented. heh.
Kalamos/everyone else: You're right. As much as I disagree with eye humping Hillary Duff and Lindsay Lohan, i'm not going to try to convince others not to. We can go back to the people who take it into real life, as most of the people on this forum seem to agree with me (Despite my way of saying it) that what they are doing is wrong.
I just wish I could get one of the people who did one of these acts to try to comment in there defense, or even better, say "you're right, I won't act that way again". A boy can dream though, a boy can dream..
Kalamos/everyone else: You're right. As much as I disagree with eye humping Hillary Duff and Lindsay Lohan, i'm not going to try to convince others not to. We can go back to the people who take it into real life, as most of the people on this forum seem to agree with me (Despite my way of saying it) that what they are doing is wrong.
I just wish I could get one of the people who did one of these acts to try to comment in there defense, or even better, say "you're right, I won't act that way again". A boy can dream though, a boy can dream..
crydun
1st Level Yellow Feather
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2001
- Messages
- 3,177
- Points
- 0
I agree with Goofy on this one. It only takes one or two to make everyone look bad.
As someone with a BA in psychology, my mind goes in a whole new direction on this. The correct(as far as psychology school goes) definition of a fetish is "an unnatural fixation on an inanimate object and/or behavior. It is diagnosed as a fetish and treatment is recommended if:
1) said fetish interferes with your personal life(i,e, fetish comes before family, work, faith, etc)
2) said fetish occupies ALL of the free space in your mind(in other words, you can't think of anything else but said fetish. The people that Goofy are referring to are probably in this category. They are so fixated that it interrupts their otherwise logical thought processes.)
3) You can't function without the actions/results of the fetish(i,e, if you go two days without seeing feet and it BOTHERS you and you "need' it, then it's a fetish)
With all that being said, there are normal variations within the fetish community. You CAN function in society with a fetish. It just requires control.
As someone with a BA in psychology, my mind goes in a whole new direction on this. The correct(as far as psychology school goes) definition of a fetish is "an unnatural fixation on an inanimate object and/or behavior. It is diagnosed as a fetish and treatment is recommended if:
1) said fetish interferes with your personal life(i,e, fetish comes before family, work, faith, etc)
2) said fetish occupies ALL of the free space in your mind(in other words, you can't think of anything else but said fetish. The people that Goofy are referring to are probably in this category. They are so fixated that it interrupts their otherwise logical thought processes.)
3) You can't function without the actions/results of the fetish(i,e, if you go two days without seeing feet and it BOTHERS you and you "need' it, then it's a fetish)
With all that being said, there are normal variations within the fetish community. You CAN function in society with a fetish. It just requires control.
Kalamos
Level of Lemon Feather
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2003
- Messages
- 12,921
- Points
- 63
That is why I think your threads do not rest on factual solid grounds.Goofytickle said:
Let us recap: you said the movie theater molester was giving tickle-fetishists a bad name.
I would like to rebuke that point by saying that he was giving *himself* a bad name.
The girl called for the cops not because the man had *tickled* her, but because he had *touched* her without consent.
I cannot say how that girl will feel in the future towards *foot* fetishists.
She'll likely take a dim view on them, but claiming that a lone dysfunctional fetishist can ruin a whole community's good name is, in my opinion, far fetched.
We agree that fetishes are just a different sexual outlook; another way to sex.
If you allow me this example, a lone fetishist molester is, in my opinion, no more likely to mar a community's reputation, than a "vanilla" molester is likely to ruin all adult men's image, on a larger scale.
Why? Second point: because we are a much more loosely knit community than you would presume.
We have little outward signs for outsiders to recognise: we do not have rules of conduct or a strict dress code.
Tickling community does not exist in the same terms as BDSM or Gay communities exist, for instance.
The reason is simple: we do not need those rules to dictate our conduct.
Tickling is harmless compared to Bondage, and most people are ticklish, to some degree.
We do not need special tools, special locales, special partners.
Tickling is often a nuance of more deeply rooted fetishes.
It really becomes a fetish when you already have a fixation for a body part, or a restraining tool.
Else, it would likely pass relatively unnoticed, since most people love to gang up and victimise friends and relatives by tickling them.
This is why I don't think that lone molester can really harm this community, yet.
As far as I know, this community is too thinly spread to be really harmed by a single ignominious event.
Foot fetishists would be more likely to be blamed, anyway, since they are more widely known.
Finally, and replying to your posts from over other thread: as long as domination/non-consensual fantasies remain such, you'll have a hard time telling people to refrain.
Men are still free to fantasise: in a perfect world, we would be able to focus hormones at will, with no need for fantasies or masturbation.
You should not call people sick because they have an imaginary sexual life; what you are condoning is thought police.
Just as you cannot punish a woman for dreaming of killing a man, you should not punish - or harshly criticise - a man for the much milder "crime" of getting off to a private fantasy.
...
Or else, I'm gonna get jailed, just 'cause I keep thinking the whole time of slaughtering all those guys I had a disagreement with. 🙂
...
Woah, that *was* long-winded, eh?
Last edited:
Sockstickler
1st Level Black Feather
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2005
- Messages
- 8,094
- Points
- 0
I'll second that for sure.m_peyton said:
Kalamos: Okay, so. Lets say, you're right. He can't destroy our reputation. So, should we just not say anything and go on our way when we see people do things we know are wrong? For instance, the story I linked to earlier, about the guy in the library. Wow, that's wrong, in my opinion. And I see a lot of those kinds of stories posted on here. A lot of people seem to think "It's just tickling" Therefor, it's okay. But...acting in the manner that he did, and the manner that others do...I feel is wrong. Really wrong. So I had to say something.
Kalamos
Level of Lemon Feather
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2003
- Messages
- 12,921
- Points
- 63
So much for my long-winded yet narrowly circumscribed explanation, eh? 😉Goofytickle said:
...
Ok, I'll be brief.
First: you should not create decoy threads.
Other people did. Mods deleted them.
Second: you should not spread slander or create panic.
Crying "pervs" does little good to your point and promotes flames.
Third: if you can prove TTC users did commit crimes, report them to mods first, and police second.
If you find questionable contents being routinely posted on TTC, please report said contents to mods, and mods alone.
It is not your duty to promote crusades.
Mods can act swiftly and effectively.
You cannot.
You are not allowed to raise up a mob and throw a lynch party.
nosocksnoshoes1
Registered User
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2003
- Messages
- 39
- Points
- 0
Wouldn't it be simpler if some of the sub-forums had a voting process, like slashdot or digg, so that people have a chance to "vote the pervs out"? Takes a little burden off the mods, makes the folks like Goofy not feel marginalized, gives newbies a better idea of what's OK and not.
