I got Tickleshotel to say her safe word

[Tamia78]

well then, nighty night 😀

Noooo! I mean, I wanna be broken down by everyone EXCEPT NT!

 

[natural tickler]

Noooo! I mean, I wanna be broken down by everyone EXCEPT NT!

too late, the Boogeyman is coming, and he's coming to get ya!!!

 

[isabeau]

Noooo! I mean, I wanna be broken down by everyone EXCEPT NT!

thats telling him Tamia

isabeau

 

[natural tickler]

thats telling him Tamia

isabeau

quiet you. Or you're NEXT

 

[natural tickler]

You know what? Believe it or not, I don't believe anybody's goal truly is to break. I believe we all are tickling for fun. If the break word comes out, that's icing on the cake. But I don't believe anyone's goal is to break, because its said to have a psychilogical advantage, to put a little chill in the lee, sort to speak

 

[jaba]

it depends on the definition of "breaking"....

It doesn't excite me in the least-that's why I enjoy being the ler. Even then, I will only go so far because tickling is not torturous to me. I'm into fun, playful, sensual and depending on my relationship with the lee, sexual.

I don't like what the concept of breaking someone through tickling implies because tickling has been used in negative ways. In my marriage, it was used to control and manipulate arguments because he wasn't ticklish. That's one of many reasons why I would NEVER play with certain people because that's their only goal and objective. It just reminds me of bullying, dominating, and controlling someone in a weaker position.

For those of you who feel it's okay to break or be broken by someone else, good for you-you're adults and it's your choice. It's just not my scene on any level at all.

Hi Kis.....

There may not be a wide divergence of opinion between us on this subject......

Maybe there is....perhaps not.....

It may be as simple as one's interpretation of the term "breaking" or cracking", or whatever other silly term may be used to describe the subject....

I also am not fond of "torture tickling", with severe discomfort for the lee, and all the screaming and thrashing that it entails....(I absolutely HATE screaming)....

That being said, if I were engaging a lady in mutually agreed upon tickle play, and during play she was so controlling as to not let out the slighest giggle or other observable reaction to my tickling, it would absolutely ruin play for me, and ensure an abrupt halt to the session, and a virtual guarantee of never engaging in tickle play with that lady ever again.....

I have a bdsm domme that I tickle (at her request, for occasional stress relief) and it is an absolute joy to me to see see her helplessly succumb to the tickling sensations despite herself and her ordinarily gruff and controlling personality.

I know her "tickle weak spots", and to see her hopelessly concede a smile and "uncontrolled giggle" when I lightly stroke her soles is a delicious thrill for the both of us.......

Tickleshotel told me that she had never used her safeword, but would like to be tickled to such limits....I think on her signature is the teasing term, "so you think you can make me say uncle?" (ha ha)

So it was mutually agreed upon that she wanted to be intensely tickled to such a state (her "breaking" or "cracking" point")

Or, perhaps, you and I just have different desires about the reactions we desire in our ticklees.....

But if my ladyfriend tells me that she wants to be "tickled sensless", then I prefer that she leave her "control" of her ticklish reactions at the door....outside of the room....




jaba

 

[drew70]

I'll never be broken because I'll never play with anyone who's intention is to break me. Breaking to me means breaking of the will and giving my power and control completely over to someone else. I'm just not willing to put that kind of power in another's hands.

If we want to just play, let's play. But if you're there to torture me into your submission, I'd rather not. I don't mean to be the killjoy, but it's the way I'm wired. Sorry folks--let's just move on to other stuff.

When I think of being broken by kis or one of the other wonderful ladies of the TMF, the only thing I can say is, "Break me, baby!! Rip me in half like a phone book!!" 😀 😀 😀

 

[Ticklerguy4u]

So it was mutually agreed upon that she wanted to be intensely tickled to such a state (her "breaking" or "cracking" point")
jaba

I agree with that totally. To be truthful, a lee pretty much can control when he/she has had enough. Whether it be two minutes or two hours. When a safeword is used. Ticklers are not out to destroy a lee's enjoyment but like with everything else in life..we do try to do our best. Breaking them is something too be proud of but not because we want to feel superior.

A lee always has control over how much he/she can take. Sometimes the ler can hit a right spot and drive them crazy or tickle so much that they can't take anymore. But either way..the lee is in control of how much is done up until the safeword is said. Now if a ler ignores the safeword than I know that will be his last session with that lee and other lees as well because news travels fast.

 

[tickleshotel]

All I can say is that Luvgirlsfeet technique was devilish,he had both my feet in a armlock pinned under his arm where he had both hands free,I couldn;t see his hands so him using his class ring caught me offguard and when I couldn;t break his grip or get away,he had me right where he wanted me and exploited my ticklishness of my tiny feet to his advantage

 

[natural tickler]

well, you got lucky this past weekend, but sooner or later I will get ya!!!

 

[tickleshotel]

well, you got lucky this past weekend, but sooner or later I will get ya!!!

Bring it on NT You were running pretty fast to get away from me

 

[Redmage]

All I can say is that Luvgirlsfeet technique was devilish,he had both my feet in a armlock pinned under his arm where he had both hands free,I couldn;t see his hands so him using his class ring caught me offguard and when I couldn;t break his grip or get away,he had me right where he wanted me and exploited my ticklishness of my tiny feet to his advantage

Sounds even worse than an electric flosser and baby oil. 😉

 

[tickleshotel]

Sounds even worse than an electric flosser and baby oil. 😉

hahahah pretty much as intense Yes 😎 Love to experience that sometime soon

 

[kis123]

Hi Kis.....

There may not be a wide divergence of opinion between us on this subject......

Maybe there is....perhaps not.....

It may be as simple as one's interpretation of the term "breaking" or cracking", or whatever other silly term may be used to describe the subject....

I also am not fond of "torture tickling", with severe discomfort for the lee, and all the screaming and thrashing that it entails....(I absolutely HATE screaming)....

That being said, if I were engaging a lady in mutually agreed upon tickle play, and during play she was so controlling as to not let out the slighest giggle or other observable reaction to my tickling, it would absolutely ruin play for me, and ensure an abrupt halt to the session, and a virtual guarantee of never engaging in tickle play with that lady ever again.....

I have a bdsm domme that I tickle (at her request, for occasional stress relief) and it is an absolute joy to me to see see her helplessly succumb to the tickling sensations despite herself and her ordinarily gruff and controlling personality.

I know her "tickle weak spots", and to see her hopelessly concede a smile and "uncontrolled giggle" when I lightly stroke her soles is a delicious thrill for the both of us.......

Tickleshotel told me that she had never used her safeword, but would like to be tickled to such limits....I think on her signature is the teasing term, "so you think you can make me say uncle?" (ha ha)

So it was mutually agreed upon that she wanted to be intensely tickled to such a state (her "breaking" or "cracking" point")

Or, perhaps, you and I just have different desires about the reactions we desire in our ticklees.....

But if my ladyfriend tells me that she wants to be "tickled sensless", then I prefer that she leave her "control" of her ticklish reactions at the door....outside of the room....




jaba

Like I said before, I will not relinquish that much control to anyone. That's my personal choice just like it is during a tickle session and the lee wants to be tickled until all control is lost. If the "breaking" is consentual, then whatever happens between two consenting adults is pretty much their business.

I don't see where I'm wrong here-if I don't want to be tickled until saying a safeword, isn't that my choice and my personal business?

 

[luvgirlsfeet]

I think it can be safely said that I'm the greatest tickler in the world any other girl dare to doubt it

 

[jaba]

i do not think that you are wrong, but I disagree......

I do not think that you are wrong as to your personal choice and your personal business, Kis....

I do not agree that your harsh perception of the term "breaking" is the only perception of the term that exists....

as an example....

lets say I walk into a room, and a ladyfriend is in the process of gift wrapping a small box. I inquire as to the contents of the box, and she smiles and replies, "you will just have to tickle it out of me!"

so, of course, I slowly walk my fingers up her sides and place them teasingly into her armpits, eliciting a fit of giggles.....

I wiggle my fingers in her armpits for a few seconds, prompting more giggles from her, then I stop and ask her, "will you tell me now?"

she giggles more and tells me," no way!"

we continue this silly tickle game, and after a minute she laughs out ,"okay!, okay! I will tell you!".

perhaps she tells me the contents of the box, (or perhaps she fibs to me) but that's not really relevent to my tale (ha ha)....

I think I (and perhaps some others on this forum ) would consider this to be a "breaking" of my lee, or making her "crack", under my playful tickles. I tickled her until she "cracked" under my teasing tickles...

perhaps others would adopt your more harsh interpretation of the term....

however, I may be wrong, but I doubt that most on this forum would consider my activities to be "torturing my lee into submission" unless they ment so in a joking sense.....

anyone here who would violate your personal choice or personal habits in your tickling activities would obviously be out of line...........

Like I said before, I will not relinquish that much control to anyone. That's my personal choice just like it is during a tickle session and the lee wants to be tickled until all control is lost. If the "breaking" is consentual, then whatever happens between two consenting adults is pretty much their business.

I don't see where I'm wrong here-if I don't want to be tickled until saying a safeword, isn't that my choice and my personal business?

 

[kis123]

I do not think that you are wrong as to your personal choice and your personal business, Kis....

I do not agree that your harsh perception of the term "breaking" is the only perception of the term that exists....

as an example....

lets say I walk into a room, and a ladyfriend is in the process of gift wrapping a small box. I inquire as to the contents of the box, and she smiles and replies, "you will just have to tickle it out of me!"

so, of course, I slowly walk my fingers up her sides and place them teasingly into her armpits, eliciting a fit of giggles.....

I wiggle my fingers in her armpits for a few seconds, prompting more giggles from her, then I stop and ask her, "will you tell me now?"

she giggles more and tells me," no way!"

we continue this silly tickle game, and after a minute she laughs out ,"okay!, okay! I will tell you!".

perhaps she tells me the contents of the box, (or perhaps she fibs to me) but that's not really relevent to my tale (ha ha)....

I think I (and perhaps some others on this forum ) would consider this to be a "breaking" of my lee, or making her "crack", under my playful tickles. I tickled her until she "cracked" under my teasing tickles...

perhaps others would adopt your more harsh interpretation of the term....

however, I may be wrong, but I doubt that most on this forum would consider my activities to be "torturing my lee into submission" unless they ment so in a joking sense.....

anyone here who would violate your personal choice or personal habits in your tickling activities would obviously be out of line...........

There are a lot of people who don't mind being "out of line" around here.

There is a thread in tickling discussion going on right now about the type of tickling I find absolutely repulsive. The kind that is non consentual and torturous. The kind of tickling that I consider abusive and borders assault. There are obviously a lot of people who think it is okay to "break" anothers will through tickling. There are obviously a lot of people who thrill at another's real-life (non-consensual) agony and would buy popcorn and seats to watch it instead of stopping it.

At this point, I feel I've spelled it out as clearly as I can. I will NEVER allow anyone to tickle me to that level without serious consequences afterwards.

Now this thread is about a consentual encounter between two people who wanted their limits tested, not about me or my reasons that I think the concept of being "broken" is completely disgusting to me and will always be that way. I'm sure they both had a good time and I'm glad for them both. It's just not something that I am interested in having done to me.