• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • Reminder - We have a ZERO TOLERANCE policy regarding content involving minors, regardless of intent. Any content containing minors will result in an immediate ban. If you see any such content, please report it using the "report" button on the bottom left of the post.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Ideal Tickles?

terorizer

Verified
Joined
Jul 29, 2001
Messages
990
Points
0
Qjakal's post in another thread, as well as the recent threads about "most beautiful" got me to wondering about something. Now I've known enough of our kind to know preferences run the gamut, but I would like to know how many of you would/could be involved, even if it were only tickling, but certainly not limited to that, with someone who was less than physically your ideal? I mean, if it were someone whose company you enjoyed, thoughts you respected and they were your tickle-ideal, could you be satisfied if they weren't "hot" to you? Or is it the "hotness" or attractiveness which would make one your tickle-ideal? Basically, I'm just wondering, when it comes down to it, how much does the physical matter... especially in the face of an otherwise, "perfect" match?
 
Well.....I had this discussion with someone else this week.

I'm not afraid to step on any toes (or tickle them for that matter). I'll say this. There is not a person on the earth who has x-ray eyes and ignores someone's physicality. Humans are like any other being, searching for an attractive mate. Are there those who can and do look past appearances? SURELY! Bless them. Are there some who have a preference for those who they are attracted to, regardless of what it is that attracts them? SURELY, and it's a good thing too.
BUT! Are we all attracted to the same types? oh HELLS no! *LOL* That's clearly evident in all of the posts about ideals. Seems there's a pattern.....but definitely, there are those who differ from the herd.
So does physical appearance matter? yeah I think so. But also because everyone does prefer something different, then that's a good thing because like the song says "If everybody looked the same, we'd get tired of looking at each other". Differences are GOOD. Preferences aren't bad either.

Could "I" be satisfied tickling someone I'm not attracted to in any manner? I will only say this. I would prefer tickling someone I was attracted to over someone I'm not. And there is NOTHING wrong with that.
 
Odd indeed...

There seems to be little rhyme or reason to who I'm attracted to in a "tickling" fashion....I don't even understand what my tiny little brain is doing at times! My conscious mind is thinking.."Hey...she's a very good looking woman!", but at some level of the subconscious where "Mr.Tickles" lives, he's going "Nope...not right...just not right." It works in both directions I'm sure.....bet women have a radar like intuition about gents they meet also. If you manage to ever figure it out, gimme a shout! Q
 
I'm attracted to people physically, but once i find out theyre not ticklish, everything is gone. However, once i meet a girl who is not very physically attractive or somewhat attractive and i find out (in some devious way) that they are very ticklish and dont mind being tickled, all bets are off. As long as we get along, its all good.
 
Attraction in whatever form always enters into it for me, and I don't think there's anything wrong with that (especially considering I'm a 20 year old guy and terminally horny). But if I enjoy a person's company attraction or lack of it certainly won't affect that. I could definitely be involved with someone to whom I wasn't necessarily "attracted" in the traditional sense, so long as I was neither repulsed by them either. And also, of course, so long as it was clear and comfortable that a tickling relationship would not necessarily lead to anything further.
 
Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder or betickler😉

She has to be physically attractive to ME and ME alone.
Everyone has their own defination of what is attractive and or beautiful.
The whole package is important including ticklishness and the love of tickling and or being tickled.
There are also those who are drop dead gorgeous physically(on the outside) and are damn UGLY on the inside.
To each ones' own.😉
I got lucky and found my darling Patti who is PERFECTION in beauty both inside and out and is extremly ticklish all over and loves it while also REALLY loves to be tickled and equally loves TO tickle!

TTD
 
if he is into it and has a mind I admire... he is somehow transformed to a Greek God!

oh, and ticklishness is worth four points on the ole 1 to 10 scale... don't you think? 😛

I really shouldn't be posting yet. I have only had one cup of coffee.
 
DUH!!!

Thanks for all the replies.... it just occured me maybe I should answer my own question! LOL

I'm one of those folks with comfort zones all over the tickle-spectrum: innocent, sexual, friendly, intimate, flirty, and so on. I relate to it in the same way I do kissing, hand holding, hugging, cuddling or massaging. I don't and won't do these things with just anybody. The relationship/connection is always primary. Period. So to answer my question, yes, I could be satisfied with tickling, when physical attraction isn't present. Attractivness doesn't come into play when I give someone a hug, so it doesn't when it comes to tickles.
 
What's New
1/18/26
There will be Trivia in our Chat room this Sunday evening at 11PM EST.

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Top