Sunriseticklee
3rd Level Orange Feather
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2002
- Messages
- 2,687
- Points
- 38
The amount of time you "knew" her (or that you both were in "contact"), as knowing someone online and reading a profile is not evidence of knowing them really at all, does not strengthen your argument, nor does it add to the validity of your counterclaim. Especially since you do not include evidence that the interactions between you both were foundationally sound and amenable enough for her to conclude that A. Your offer was valid and B. That you were someone she wanted to conduct business with.
FURTHERMORE- You took one singular sentence out of context. This sentence was referring to SESSIONS!
She responded to a direct quote regarding sessions with her paragraph referring to sessions. As you can clearly read, she continues with referring to travel and hotel costs in response to LeatherRebell.
As your post is referring to an offer for pictures, you CLEARLY are comparing your offer to something else entirely, thus further proving the point that her assertion was not false and that you counterclaim is based upon a false premise.
Your willingness to publicly show how wrong someone is may be impeding your full comprehension of the actual point. Your goal was to state how false she was; however, she still isn't. It is posted in bad faith. And given how she has been addressed throughout this entire thread, your post was unnecessary.
Publicly attacking her words and then saying how great she is- Well.. that's truly contradictory.
So perhaps... Leave this alone.
You misunderstand this part. I was referring to the men who gladly throw money at others, while simultaneously demanding the exact same service from me but without pay. Especially when they ask me to cover all the travel and hotel costs. If they offered the same compensation as they did the other girls, that would be very different. That’s why my boundaries are in place and why I began to enforce them more strictly.
FURTHERMORE- You took one singular sentence out of context. This sentence was referring to SESSIONS!
She responded to a direct quote regarding sessions with her paragraph referring to sessions. As you can clearly read, she continues with referring to travel and hotel costs in response to LeatherRebell.
As your post is referring to an offer for pictures, you CLEARLY are comparing your offer to something else entirely, thus further proving the point that her assertion was not false and that you counterclaim is based upon a false premise.
Your willingness to publicly show how wrong someone is may be impeding your full comprehension of the actual point. Your goal was to state how false she was; however, she still isn't. It is posted in bad faith. And given how she has been addressed throughout this entire thread, your post was unnecessary.
Publicly attacking her words and then saying how great she is- Well.. that's truly contradictory.
So perhaps... Leave this alone.