Joanna Krupa Tickled Pink in Fetish Video

[JJB]

I didn't see this anywhere on the forum yet, so apologies if it's a repost. It's always fun to see a "mainstream" post about tickling, especially a fetish video on a site like TMZ.

Link to TMZ (with video clip!)

Joanna Krupa has got one hilarious foot fetish -- or at least she does in this laughable low budget fetish video from back in the day ... complete with more tickle torture than anyone should ever have to endure.

TMZ has learned the Playboy bombshell and "Dancing with the Stars" competitor scored the starring role of "Head Nurse Regina" in the foot fetish/tickle torture film "No Shoes No Mercy" back in 2003 ... probably for some extra cash before her big break.

In the video, Krupa starts off by unleashing her fingers of fury on her female tickle partner ... then gets tied down on the hospital bed for an awkwardly awesome session of her very own.

As for Krupa's tickle partner? That's Sarah Kozer -- a reality TV regular you might recognize as the runner-up from "Joe Millionaire."

 

[iceman]

That's an old clip but a great one. Thank you!

 

[TicklishAllison]

I caught this one today too. I thought TMZ would write something about being freaked out by it... but one of the most gorgeous models in the world getting tickled? Yeah, TMZ might have a tickle-phile on staff. It made my day to find this... wondering what people will think?

 

[JJB]

It was just a few months ago when they had that "Foot Fetish Contest" too. Even though most of them were foot abnormalities (missing toes, extra toes, etc), there were a few with nice feet. Harvey Levin probably has a foot fetish at least.

 

[Darkknight]

I bought this clip when Sarah was exposed and now I have Joanna, two tv celebs in one clips.

Too bad Joanna wasn't very ticklish, Sarah was a better tickle actress.

There's another FMC girl that's been showing up in commercials, just saw her in a car commercial and she's been in a jeans one and I think another one where she's wearing a wedding dress. I think Gina something. Cali models start somewhere!

DK

 

[Darkknight]

Sarah was outted by a TMF member, I can't remember who it was but it didn't hurt her career. In fact, I think on her Myspace a while back she had posted photos of herself from FM and the tickling one as well.

It's probable that Joanna was brought to TMZ's attention by a ticklephile but I know it wasn't me.. I DO NOT watch Dancing with the stars so I would have never known. I too doubt this will hurt Joanna's career.

I don't support outting models but I'm sure happy as hell that they make it mainstream but a long while back... they did a tickle video.

DK

 

[Iggy]

I caught this one today too. I thought TMZ would write something about being freaked out by it... but one of the most gorgeous models in the world getting tickled? Yeah, TMZ might have a tickle-phile on staff. It made my day to find this... wondering what people will think?

Did you see it on TV, Allison? The commentary was pretty interesting too, and it was relatively mild on the mock-meter. I regret not taping it, but it was interesting seeing Sarah Kozer mentioned again.

Anyone manage to see the TV thing and record it?

 

[Iggy]

I bought this clip when Sarah was exposed and now I have Joanna, two tv celebs in one clips.

Too bad Joanna wasn't very ticklish, Sarah was a better tickle actress.

There's another FMC girl that's been showing up in commercials, just saw her in a car commercial and she's been in a jeans one and I think another one where she's wearing a wedding dress. I think Gina something. Cali models start somewhere!

DK

Gina Caruso?

 

[SadCuzNotTcklsh]

That's how we lost Kelli Lessur.

Who?

 

[Darkknight]

Gina Caruso?

My bad, it was Gia, not Gina. Gia Mancini. I think it's a BMW commercial she's in, some kind of car commercial, saw her last week in one. She's gorgeous and has the California girl look.

DK

 

[Darkknight]

It always seemed ironic to me that so many of the models FM worked with back in my day were actively seeking the sort of fame (though, not necessarily, that type of notoriety) that Sarah got. But she wasn't.

All due respect, DK, but Sarah was unjustly ridiculed, villified and her character assassinated in the national media. She was called a liar (although she told the truth about everything) and lied about. Some people may not care that they have to pay that price to be a "household name", but she did. She suffered a lot from being 'outed', and if she's been able to find peace with that now, good for her.

I hear you Chase and that's why I hide behind a screenname and don't use my real name on the internet, to hold on to my privacy. I'm sure some of your models needed the money and others just for a little fame, with the internet being part of everyday life, they can't hide from being recognized.
Since I don't know Sarah (only saw her on Joe Millionare) I can't know what she went through but she seems to be doing ok and I agree, I hope it works good for all your models.

One of the brightest, nicest, most engaging, and certainly, one of the most ticklish models I ever worked with when I was at FM. She was a jewel.

I loved her, still have that DVD with her and a VHS I believe, she seemed very down to earth.

DK

 

[Darkknight]

I say again to all, don't support or participate in this type of behavior.

Hey Chase,

I've bought many clips from you back in the day and still once in a while when one catches my eyes. I don't support or participate in that type of behavior (outting your models), what I support is buying tickle clips.

Did you see Sarah on TMZ about her tickling clip with FMC? Check it out, interesting.

DK

 

[bostonguy123]

Joanna Krupa rocks!

 

[jts963]

Sarah was outted by a TMF member, I can't remember who it was ...

Some guy named Westchester. He brags about it here:

http://www.ticklingforum.com/showthread.php?t=24339

For all the people saying they have no sympathy for Sarah or Joanna about their pasts being exposed, the bottom line is that those videos were not "unearthed" by TMZ or whatever, they were distributed ILLEGALLY by a member of our community to mainstream news because he wanted to be a "newsmaker". I wish FMC would track him down and sue his ass off.

People forget that Traci Lords made it into mainstream films because her porn films were destroyed and unairable (she was underaged when they were made). So she had the notoriety of being a porn star without any embarrassing footage to let the prudes attack her mainstream work. It's very different for former fetish stars whose fetish work can be exposed on sites like The Smoking Gun and TMZ thanks to guys like Westchester.

 

[Soda83pop]

"People, outing these models is always hurtful and should not be done."

Lets all be honest with ourselves for a second.

I have several (by several I mean many, many) ties to the adult industry, including fetish sites. The fact of the matter is, the second someone signs a contract to appear in that type of footage, they should know what comes with it. And one of the facts is, that it will be a part of their lives forever, right wrong or indifferent. I am not saying that people should be "outing" models, but it is what it is. I have been working on porn sites of some type or another for almost 10 years. People know my real name (its all over the web) as well as my dajerx name. People where I work know what I did in the past, and stil do. I knew that when I started, weighed the risks and moved forward. Not quite the same level stigma, but its still there and my current job could fire me if they wanted. And if they did, you know I would blame...myself, for agreeing to do it 10 years ago. Certainly not the guy that put dajerx and "keith" together and said "thats the guy that ...."

Chase, I have friends that shot for FMC in the past as well, and you know what...same thing applies. You get on camera, you risk being discovered. Im not condoning what was done, but to act like they were innocent bystanders is a bit much. They choose that lifestyle. Some people have the talent to work past the stigma and do mainstream work, while some people have hit their peak when tied up on of the FMC couches and getting tickled. That is no one's fault but theirs. The money FMC pays to the models is not a conditional "if you get discovered we will compensate you for the pain and suffering."

Do I feel bad for them, sure...I can empathize because I understand. Do I blame whomever does it here or anywhere else. No...

 

[jts963]

"People, outing these models is always hurtful and should not be done."

Lets all be honest with ourselves for a second.

...

Do I feel bad for them, sure...I can empathize because I understand. Do I blame whomever does it here or anywhere else. No...

Does what here or anywhere else? If you mean ILLEGALLY distributing FMC material that the buyer contractually agreed not to distribute, then I'm not seeing that as blameless at all.

It appears that some in our community want to place all responsibility on the models and none at all on the outers. I don't get that , especially since the outings aren't being done for any moral purpose; it's all being done for publicity or "bragging rights".

If FMC is outing their own models, then they are to blame. I seriously doubt that they are. And if FMC is not suing websites like TMZ for posting their material without permission, then future models should be warned that FMC will do NOTHING to shield them from abuse by outsiders.

 

[ZenTickling]

I saw this on Fox News. Crazy.

 

[Soda83pop]

Does what here or anywhere else? If you mean ILLEGALLY distributing FMC material that the buyer contractually agreed not to distribute, then I'm not seeing that as blameless at all.

You want me to get mad about the material being stolen? Im all for that and would love to see FMC do what they can to recover their lost money.

You want me to get mad because someone got paid to do a bondage video early in their career, went on a nationally televised reality show and was "outed" (why are we calling it that anyway????) to TMZ....no. Im not. And it doesnt matter the reason...how do we know someone from tmz doesnt have a paying membership. There also FMC videos on VoD sites; we dont know the clip didnt come from that do we? Its no different than being up in arms because someone told E! that Jenna Jameson did porn so they turned her away. I know people that lose mainstream opportunities all the time because of their pr0n careers. Do I think its right? No. Do I get my panties in a bunch over it tho...no here as well becasue it is understood when you do that type of work that that could very well happen.

Truth be told, no one cares about this but the people here. She has gotten more press on this site than she has anywhere else.

And if FMC is not suing websites like TMZ for posting their material without permission, then future models should be warned that FMC will do NOTHING to shield them from abuse by outsiders.

If you think FMC doesnt warn people about the redistribution of their individual scenes as well as the possibility that redistribution could happen illegally as well, then you understand very little about that side of the business. Which is cool, maybe adult entertainment isnt your thing. But FMC lets people know not only will THEY be repackaging scenes, but those scenes could be illegally redistributed by other buyers. Its no secret to anybody involved in the process, friend.

 

[Darkknight]

Well TMZ got her today, sad I have recorded that show just cuz of the recent tickle buzz... well they found Joanna and asked her about the tickle video, she was not happy with the question and said no comment.

Guess TMZ road this slow news month to the max with the tickle video, so until the next "model being tickled sighting"... this one is done.

DK

 

[SadCuzNotTcklsh]

Well TMZ got her today, sad I have recorded that show just cuz of the recent tickle buzz... well they found Joanna and asked her about the tickle video, she was not happy with the question and said no comment.

Guess TMZ road this slow news month to the max with the tickle video, so until the next "model being tickled sighting"... this one is done.

DK

Maybe other talk shows will ask her about it when she is eliminated from show or wins it....I hope she's not ashamed of doing the video...

 

[Soda83pop]

I won't enumerate because I didn't really enter this thread to find or lay blame. I'm only asking that people who want to participate in this behavior be more mindful about the damage that can be done to several persons just because they have some ego-driven need to feel important in sharing the information.

Im not condoning the activity you are speaking of by anyone either; I personally would like to think we all had better things to do with our time then scan old tickling videos so we can report a girl the first time we see her peddling Wendy's burgers in a commercial.

But I also wont act like these same women did not know that these things COULD occur with or without the help of someone. Someone at TMZ or any other show could have a tickle fetish and watch these vids, and act on what they see. They voluntarily performed in a movie that paid them well BUT had a risk/reward attached. Was whatever the going rate at the time for a tickle model be worth the world knowing they were in a video? The risk was there, I have to assume it was explained by the people filming the scene (or that common sense may kick in). These women decided it was....and later the scenes were uncovered.

All things considered, it will blow over soon enough, and they/she can get back to doing DWTS and other reality shows.

 

[jts963]

FM had nothing to do with either of these incidents, and they did everything they could at the time to protect Sarah. No legal action was ever taken against anyone by FM for various reasons, and it wouldn't have been of any help anyway. If you want to try and argue that it would've dissuaded tabloid outlets from doing the same thing in the future, TMZ has proven that false by showing the clip that they did without permission. TMZ realises that it has nothing to fear from a lawsuit from anyone, and I'm sure that they have a battery of very high priced lawyers who just sit in anticipation of chewing folks up who try.

OK this is totally wrong. FMC has every right to issue a cease and desist letter or even an email, and TMZ would ignore it at their extreme peril. YouTube will drop a video from their website at the slightest signal from a copyright owner. TMZ, The Smoking Gun, etc, are just stink-ass websites with more ego than brain cells. Bitchslapping them would be both easy and a public service.

I'd really like to hear what rationales FMC has for not protecting their copyrighted material from mainstream media. One might think they want it both ways: free publicity and feigned outrage.

http://www.ticklingforum.com/showthread.php?t=131569

http://www.tickletheater.com/showthread.php?t=4965

 

[jts963]

First, I need to make clear to you that I no longer work for FM, and can not speak for their rationale. I only know what I do from being employed by them when the Sarah Kozer thing was going on, and it would be inappropriate for me to elaborate about it. But your speculation about them using these circumstances for "free publicity" is a very false assumption. It was quite the opposite.

FWIW, I share your outrage at what major media/tabloid outlets are able to get away with, but it would not be quite as easy as you might imagine to "bitchslap" them.

Are you seriously suggesting that FMC couldn't find one lawyer who'd jump at the chance to take their case on contingency to sue a "deep-pockets" media outlet that has neither the law nor the facts on its side? The cease-and-desist would go into effect immediately while the case was being litigated ... assuming that's what FMC really wanted: to get their material removed from the media outlet(s).

The mainstream media could have reported these fetish stories without using stolen visual material, just like they reported the Traci Lords porn story without visual material. That FMC has let them get away with using stolen visual material makes FMC just as culpable as the clown who illegally distributed their material in the first place.

EDIT: Check out which video is currently one of the Editor's Favorites:

http://128.242.184.223/group.cfm?group=tickling

Coincidence? I think not.

 

[Soda83pop]

It was never my intention to imply that I thought you did. If anything I said gave you that impression, then you have my apologies for the misunderstanding.

Chase, you have done nothing wrong brother, your good as gold. I didnt imply anything.

 

[jts963]

Some people in this thread are being obtuse. Did the story have a high risk of getting out eventually? Of course.

But what some here are overlooking for whatever reasons is that the story didn't have to have pictures. And that makes a world of difference.

I keep going back to the Traci Lords example. She was able to have a mainstream career because her porn pictures were NOT plastered all over TV, newspapers and magazines (no internet back then either).

Let's be honest. These stories about Sarah and Joanna wouldn't be getting a tenth of the coverage they have if there were no vidcaps and vidclips to adorn them. The mainstream media knows that, and deep down so does everybody else, including people posting in this thread how all the "blame" falls on Sarah and Joanna. So no responsibility for FMC that refuses to safeguard their own copyright, and no responsibility for the mainstream media that rushes to post what is allegedly adult material for all the world to see and doing so (allegedly) without permission from the copyright owner.

I had no idea we had so many corporatist apologists in this forum.