Locks that can be controlled by an online dom

[bondagebabe]

I love computers and building computers. I am currently working on self bondage equipment that is controlled by an online dom somewhere else. Unfortunately my first test went horrible and i had to get the bolt cutter to get free. I have some new ones made, that work, but have never been used on me. I designed them to be bluetooth compatible, and if they loose signal they release. My old ones would not release if the battery died. My new ones are spring loaded to open if the batt dies. I am trying to design them safely but without losing the sex appeal. Currently I have 10 identical locks. I took out the guts and wired in a heavy duty elctromagnet. (like the ones u see on door locks. With a small circuit they are hard programed (not software based) to open if they do not receive and order from the computer in 5 seconds. They also will open if the computers internet or dom is signed off for more then 30 min. The software is designed to interface with aim. Any pre approved user can type command to open or close any lock. (assuming they have fresh batteries and are in range.) I am thinking these will be fun for self bondage. I am thinking of integrating a microphone on the computer to unlock if it hears a smoke alarm. I think this is a safe as possible. If the comp crashes they unlock. If internet goes out they unlock. Since the lock defaults to open a lose i n power will unlock. the dom of course will know if the locks relise and can punish the slave. I know this has nothing o do with tickling, but many tickling lover love bondage to. Sow hat do you guy think? any improvement ideas? anyone wanna help me test um out?

 

[ViperGTS]

First of all, you're looking for a Domme, not a Dom, since you're a lesbian.

Second of all,

Unfortunately my first test went horrible and i had to get the bolt cutter to get free.

illustrates exactly why this is a horrible, horrible idea until you are comfortable and trusting with that person, and an "online" "Domme" cannot be trusted completely by virtue of the fact that it's not an in-person relationship.

With all the various safety issues and other problems involved, why are you even considering this? Just find a real-life, in-person someone whom you can grow to like and possibly love, who can "control" you without the dangers of the interwebs inbetween?

Or go download Second Life or something, and just practice self control while you RP.

 

[bondagebabe]

Just find a real-life, in-person someone whom you can grow to like and possibly love, who can "control" you without the dangers of the interwebs inbetween?

If i could do that i would not be trying to meet lesbian fiends online

 

[locker669]

Unless you want to sell the idea and make a ton of money I wouldn't do it, especially after reading the bolt cutter part.

 

[bondagebabe]

Unless you want to sell the idea and make a ton of money I wouldn't do it, especially after reading the bolt cutter part.

that was only the prototype, and that's why I had the cutter near by lol. Every electric needs beta testing lol. I';m so surprised, I thought i would get "that so cool i wanna try that" O well maybe it not as fun as i think. I only have an online dom though so i thought people like me would enjoy.

 

[bondagebabe]

o yea, since when does dom only mean guy?

 

[Skulls]

I think it just means like how you have a widow and a widower. It's not a HUGE deal to mix it up with the appropriate sex, it's just our wonderful(sarcasm) English language.

By the way, I would not like the idea because of the trust factor. If people do have very trusting relationships on-line, then I believe it is a great idea for those people. It's just a small market I imagine.

 

[Cosmo_ac]

I think its an interesting idea. I do agree that one would have to be careful when using such things, but ultimately it is the responsibility of the person who is using such a device to have a good enough relationship of trust with the other person before they use it.

 

[Sanhael]

o yea, since when does dom only mean guy?

Since "Domme" refers to a woman. "Dom" indicates a male.

This is an absolutely horrible idea. You don't have the same depth of relationship online as you do in person. There is no way to tell for sure if the person you're talking to is anything even remotely resembling what they say they are. There have been many, many instances, some of them reported on here as occurring to friends or relatives of TMF members, of people being tricked by online "romantic partners" into meeting up with them... whereupon they were raped, or tortured, or enslaved, in a fashion having nothing to do with what they had been looking for.

Giving these predators a way to reach out and touch someone by developing some actual device they can control remotely is utterly foolish. You cannot achieve the depth of sincerity and understanding online that you ought to have before entrusting someone with this level of control over you. Never-mind the fact that the first time somebody falls over, and damages the thing, and it doesn't open in the event of a smoke alarm... a difficult safety-feature at best... you've got someone burning to death (c'mon, don't tell me you haven't heard of weirder shit than that). I'm not so desperate for an interesting new Darwin Award that I'm eager to see that.

A long time ago, when I was first introduced to the concept of D/s, I was absolutely certain that the person in the "s" position was simply mentally ill; that they lacked any concept of self, or else had absolutely wretched self-esteem. It took a long time for me to be dissuaded from that notion; things like this make me wonder just how wrong I originally was.

 

[Redmage]

Since "Domme" refers to a woman. "Dom" indicates a male.

It's not a hard and fast rule. Non-heterosexual kinksters are much less likely to observe it.

That said, if one is looking for a dominant of a specific gender, it's helpful to specify that up front. "Dominant man/woman" works just fine for that.

Giving these predators a way to reach out and touch someone by developing some actual device they can control remotely is utterly foolish. You cannot achieve the depth of sincerity and understanding online that you ought to have before entrusting someone with this level of control over you.

As I understand the write up, the lock defaults to off if it loses power, or if the internet connection to which it is tuned goes off for a certain period of time. So in a worst-case scenario the bottom just has to turn off his or her computer.

All in all it's probably no more risky than self-bondage with handcuffs and a key in an ice cube.

 

[Leo tickles]

Yes, giving somebody physical control over your body with electronics that you met on the internet is a marvelous idea. A+, 5 points.


No.


Not really.



Safety.. goooood

 

[scorpionldr]

Sorry but I have to side with these guys. Electronics/computers have demonstrated to me that no matter how great something will work for you, that they can, and WILL have the potential to fail. If that happens with one of your sessions, I think you would have a pretty tough situation on your hands, bolt cutter or not.

 

[scorpionldr]

All in all it's probably no more risky than self-bondage with handcuffs and a key in an ice cube.

how? at least if the SO in question can see your in pain you don't have to wait to see someone (MAYBE someone technologically inept?) fumbling around while your struggling to help yourself

 

[LeeAllure]

I have a friend who is working on equipment like that, with
others who do the same. They've never had to cut equipment
off, I can tell you that, even when things don't work out as
they hoped.

It might be a good idea for you to search out others who are
doing similar, or wait until theirs go commercial.

Lee

 

[Redmage]

how? at least if the SO in question can see your in pain you don't have to wait to see someone (MAYBE someone technologically inept?) fumbling around while your struggling to help yourself

I say again: it's no more risky than SELF BONDAGE with the key in an ice cube (or similar timed release device).

Did you note the reference to self bondage? That is, bondage applied by oneself, to oneself? In such scenes there generally is no one else around to see you.

By the way, why is everyone assuming that the top on the other end of the wire is a stranger?

 

[bondagebabe]

Ok so many of you have brought up the trust issue. I was never implying for you to go out on the internet and say "who wants to lock me up". If you have been talking with a person for a year though, or you knew someone in person that moved away trust is not an issue. If you let anyone use this device on you then yea, its a bit riskier, but you still can override by turning off the computer. I think that being able to over ride to by simply turning off the computer makes it pretty safe even if someone is not who they say they are. I added the smoke alarm thing as an added safety feature. In reality tons of people practice self bondage and risk being burned alive. Even if that part doesn't work, its no less safe then self bondage. Not to mention the computer would fail when temperatures get above 110 and the locks would let go. In response to leeallure, they failed the first time because i did not test them enough. I was never in danger and was just horny so i decided to try them out prematurity. I knew the cutters were nearby and was planning on using them if my prototype failed. In response to scorpionldr, how will this device fail? It need power for the electromagnet to kep it shut. Worst case scenario all the hardware and safety backups fail, you have to wait for the battery to die. They take 3 hour, 6 hour, 12 hour, or 24 hour batts, if your worried about failure, use a 3 hour batt. When it dies and cant power the magnet to hold back the spring the lock opens. In response to leo, as another poster pointed out, you still can override the system by powering down your computer. Inresponce to Sanhael, i think your concerns were addressed above, but your concern about damaging the lock I would like to address. They are made with the same casing as a regular padlock. The spring makes it easier to open if if it were damaged the elctro magnet would probably not line up or the wires powering it would break. It is really no more dangerous then using a pad lock in SB.

 

[milagros317]

This site may be of interest:

http://www.mykeysafe.com/

Rather than controlling a device such as a chastity belt itself online, the device's key is in a safe and the safe is controlled by an online Mistress.

 

[LeeAllure]

This site may be of interest:

http://www.mykeysafe.com/

Rather than controlling a device such as a chastity belt itself online, the device's key is in a safe and the safe is controlled by an online Mistress.

And that's exactly the device which is being upgraded to allow control
by someone of your choosing.

Lee

 

[fireguardian]

Personally I think it is a cool idea if you are working with a long distance relationship. I agree with the others that just a random person online having control over the device doesn't seem the safest. If you wanted to go that route at least make sure you have an over ride that is easy to activate.
But I really do like the idea and hope it does work out for you. If you can get it working I would strongly suggest getting all the patents and sell it. Something like that will probably do very well if some at the right places to the right people. Best of luck with it.

 

[bondagebabe]

Thanks for the positive support