You're right, it is amusing that birds of a feather, flock together. I'm curious, when you reference "thugs" is that because Michael Jackson is black or that anyone who arrested for a crime is considered a thug, even though he was acquitted. I wish individuals such "Darth Vegeta" would spend more time using his computer to chase down facts instead of using supposition to slander someone.
A few examples:
In New York during the 80's, 5 (Black & Hispanic) kids get arrested and convicted on rape charges. 14 years later, they are found innocent because their DNA doesn't match the evidence from the crime scene, once word gets out a witness comes forward. It's then proved that one man did the crime who just happened to be in jail for murder and rape. The DA doesn't want to admit a mistake and believes they are still guilty because in his mind (just like yours), all black people are guilty regardless of the facts. Eventually all the kids, now men are freed.
or
Jerry Miller who on October 1, 1982, Miller was convicted of rape, robbery and kidnapping. The Innocence Project took on Miller’s case in 2005. After DNA testing excluded Miller, the Cook County State Attorney’s Office had to vacate and dismiss Miller’s conviction on April 23, 2007. That's 25 years of his life behind bars because an all white jury found him guilty. Hey, black man & dead white woman, he must have did it. The perpetrator’s profile was also entered into the FBI convicted offender database, which implicated another man "Robert Weeks". Weeks is currently facing charges in several other sexual assaults.
In the last few years, 200 people have been arrested, prosecuted, convicted, and sent to prison for years (14 of whom had been sentenced to death), eventually to have their innocence established by scientific proof. 200 people who served a total of 2,475 years in prison, almost one million nights, for crimes they did not commit. Over 80% were Black or Hispanic, and when jury members were interviewed from these past cases, they admitted they found the person guilty, not because of the evidence, but on the theory that because of who they were they most likely did it.
My point is this, people can say what ever they want, just use facts. Calling someone a child molester and proving it are 2 different things. Like OJ, he was guilty as hell and should of rot in prison for that crime, but when you allow a famed corrupt police force, a crime scene run by the keystone cops who screwed up all the evidence, an overzealous DA and your investigation in run by a well known racist detective, you don't need to be rich or a celeb to get off on all charges.
P.S.
I guess you were wrong "Darth Vegeta", i didn't need to insult someone to make my point. After reading your opinions on race and going though many of your old posts on the subject of tickling, I'm curious, do you use just a White Hood or an all White Sheet to cover your face. Just a thought, my brother...
something tells me he doesn't care much..
