• The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

The TMF is sponsored by:

Clips4Sale Banner

Mom Please Don't F/M Graphic and extreme

Tickled Guy

4th Level Yellow Feather
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
3,768
Points
0
After Shawn was punished by his step sister for destroying her teddy bear the vindictive brat takes it one step further and tells mom. Mom rushes home from her trip to fix this problem once and for all. Devon begins by tickle torturing Shawns sides and upper body with her sharp nails making him beg her to stop. Mom slaps him hard in the face and continues the torture. She's known for years how to make boys behave so she pulls down his pants and starts brutally stroking his cock while squeezing his balls. She forces a huge load out of him then continues stroking his now very sensitive cock til he screams. As a quick reminder as to what will happen if he does it again mom rakes his body with her sharp nails rapidly once more.

This Intense But Very Short Full Length Clip Is Available Now On:

WWW.TICKLEDGUY.COM
 
His mom is "brutally stroking his cock"? His mom?
I know it's just actors but....ew.
 
So uh, there's quite a few requests for someones mom jacking them off eh?
 
<a href='http://cheezburger.com/View/2382065408'><img src='http://images.cheezburger.com/completestore/2009/7/8/128915926923592768.jpg' id='_r_a_2382065408' title="I'm not familiar with the kind of thing I'm seeing" alt="I'm not familiar with the kind of thing I'm seeing" /></a>
 
Oh my....ehm i know they are all actors but...HIS MOM?REALLY? There's tons of other scenarios that can be used. :sowrong:
 
The scenario isn't of my taste, but the lee had great reactions and she was definitely into the action :), all in all, great clip!
 
So uh, there's quite a few requests for someones mom jacking them off eh?

Surprisingly yes and you'd be surprised how many I get for the Daddy daughter too. I know this isn't for everyone taste hence the initial warnings of Graphic and extreme. I'll try almost any scenario once and based on the sales today I'll probably do it again.
 
I should have known better when the subject had "mom" and "graphic"/"extreme" in it. I think I need to take a cold cold shower.
 
Where do the forum rules draw the line? Tickling stories with minors aren't allowed but incestuos videos are? I don't know, but something's not in balance, there.
 
LOL, it is pretty horrendous really but how many of us actually watched the clip out of sheer morbid curiousity? It's a bit like rubber-necking at a road accident!
 
Well if it wasn't really THAT unrealistic and clearly faked...
OMG!
I did not watch it btw.
 
He probably learned his lessons. I hope mom rides him as his next punishment!
 
Where do the forum rules draw the line? Tickling stories with minors aren't allowed but incestuos videos are? I don't know, but something's not in balance, there.

And why wouldn't a video involving two consenting adults be allowed? A story or art with a minor = that character is a minor. A video with two consenting adults = two adults playing roles.

In any case, on the topic of the video: */m vids aren't really my style but he has great reactions.
 
And why wouldn't a video involving two consenting adults be allowed? A story or art with a minor = that character is a minor. A video with two consenting adults = two adults playing roles.

All a matter of perspective. A minor in a (non-sexual) tickling story: A person engaging in per se legal things.

Adults in a video like this: The actions being pictured are not only morally questionable but (depending on the applicable law) also criminal.

Don't get me wrong: I think the no-minors rule is absolutely appropriate for a fetish forum. But those requirements should also apply to other questionable sexual contexts. Illegal sexual actions shouldn't be tolarated no matter if they involve minors or not. The minors rule doesn't allow the fake / fantasy argument, either, and rightfully so.
 
All a matter of perspective. A minor in a (non-sexual) tickling story: A person engaging in per se legal things.

Adults in a video like this: The actions being pictured are not only morally questionable but (depending on the applicable law) also criminal.

Don't get me wrong: I think the no-minors rule is absolutely appropriate for a fetish forum. But those requirements should also apply to other questionable sexual contexts. Illegal sexual actions shouldn't be tolarated no matter if they involve minors or not. The minors rule doesn't allow the fake / fantasy argument, either, and rightfully so.

"The actions being pictured are not only morally questionable but (depending on the applicable law) also criminal." Morally questionable - goodness, wouldn't want a forum full of bondage and non-consensual tickling art, stories, and fantasy videos to be morally questionable! :p I'm going to guess you don't watch any of the videos on here, of women or men being tied up? Also very morally questionable.

Also, the only criminal law they might fall under would be obscenity - and so would a majority of videos on here, yet I don't see you replying to, say, Tickle Abuse's fake kidnapping and forced orgasm videos with something like this, although you now claim what you're objecting to is that it's a fictional illegal act and not the original "gasp" incest.

If you don't like it then... here's a big tip: Don't watch it, and don't comment. They aren't doing anything illegal.
 
uhhhh, I love the clip. But maybe you should change the storyline to step mom. That sounds more better them having your own mom jerk you off.
 
If you don't like it then... here's a big tip: Don't watch it, and don't comment. They aren't doing anything illegal.
Cool down, dude. To be honest, I'm not half as involved in this matter as it might seem. So there's really no need to tell a long time member with 200 times your post count when to comment and when not.

I just intended to provoke a little bit and at least question the rules we're applying. When picturing illegal things - be it incest, rape or whatever - it's always the same question: How far do you go and do you want to run the risk of accidentally showing "real" crimes? That's at least part of the idea behind the no minors rule. And as far as I know the video wouldn't have been allowed if it said "14 year old son". And the difference to other illegal actions is actually: technically none. Just a decision by the rule makers, a line being drawn. And thus at least worth discussing. I didn't intend to say anything more or less. In the end, I don't really care all that much. So relax.
 
Ok guys back to your corners and lets call it a draw. I know my material can be offensive to some and accept the harsh criticisms/debates they spark. I knew it would happen when I got this request 2 mos ago and started the series with Stella. I had a big response planned and was even going to go so far as implying Leechmaster being more upset over a lack of kiddie tickle content LMAO.:gathering:

Then I looked a bit deeper and realized he is questioning the rules not my content. You make a valid point when it comes to forum rules and undefined lines but if we start looking at morality we would need to rule out every sexual gratification including masturbation and stick to a life of missionary position lol. Who's wants a life with no blowjobs, footjobs or doggy style?:panic:
 
What's New

6/5/2024
The TMF Welcome forum has a place for you to say hello to us! Take a moemnt and say Hi.
Tickle Experiment
Door 44
NEST 2024
Register here
The world's largest online clip store
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top