Where do the forum rules draw the line? Tickling stories with minors aren't allowed but incestuos videos are? I don't know, but something's not in balance, there.
His mom is "brutally stroking his cock"? His mom?
I know it's just actors but....ew.
All a matter of perspective. A minor in a (non-sexual) tickling story: A person engaging in per se legal things.
Adults in a video like this: The actions being pictured are not only morally questionable but (depending on the applicable law) also criminal..
I swear I can do mother daughter and you rave, I can do sisters with forced orgasms and you drool, Uncle and Niece go top 50 and mother son gets this much criticism?
Define morality, please. Who get's to define what is 'moral' or not? You? Me? Some heavy-breathing preacher-man?
If it's not for you, fine. But don't come wagging your finger trying to preach 'morality' to the rest of us. It just makes you look very pompous, arrogant, and very much 'holier than thou'
I'm sorry and mean no disrespect but as the son of a Southern Baptist Minister (who thought himself very righteous and that he was the only one going to Heaven) that rubs me the wrong way.
And on the subject of 'criminal', what standards do you have to reference? You do realize that what may be 'criminal' in one area may not be in another. Right?
Entering a thread entitled: "Mom - Please Don't F/M Graphic and extreme" on a tickling fetish website, and then being shocked (by unrelated actors at that), is sheer stupidity.
Signs that say "Danger: No Swimming" mean just that!
OK, I didn't intend to return to this thread, but I won't let this whole "morality can hardly be defined" thing slip.
To say it loud and clear: A mother jerking off her son is just sick and perverted. Period. It is *far* from other fetishes that are just odd likings like tickling itself.
Also, sex between parents and children should be illegal in *most* modern western countries.
So don't tell me what i can judge and what not.
Well, if you read through my previous posts in this thread, you will see that i made my intentions a little clearer, originally. My last post was rather directed at the nihilistic approach that some are taking by practically saying: "Nothing can be defined, nothing is right or wrong, everything's allowed and no one is even *allowed* to judge contents". That's not true. Lines can be drawn and for certain fantasies this forum has done that, and rightfully so.To say it loud and clear: Kidnapping someone and tickle torturing them and forcing them to orgasm is just sick and perverted. Period. And it's illegal!
Oh wait, you don't go the threads with those videos and talk about how sick and immoral it is because they don't personally squick you, right? Fictional assault is okay as long as it's not a fictional mom and fictional son?
It's fair to tell you that you should either stand by your judgment - fictional morals matter, therefore all fictional videos involving kidnapping or forced anything are also immoral - or maybe, just maybe, don't come into a thread labeled with "mom, don't do that!" and be shocked, appalled, and horrified that two consenting, unrelated adults are engaging in fictional roleplay.
<a href='http://cheezburger.com/View/2382065408'><img src='http://images.cheezburger.com/completestore/2009/7/8/128915926923592768.jpg' id='_r_a_2382065408' title="I'm not familiar with the kind of thing I'm seeing" alt="I'm not familiar with the kind of thing I'm seeing" /></a>
dude, I love futurama. and that made me laugh so hardOK, I didn't intend to return to this thread, but I won't let this whole "morality can hardly be defined" thing slip.
To say it loud and clear: A mother jerking off her son is just sick and perverted. Period. It is *far* from other fetishes that are just odd likings like tickling itself.
Also, sex between parents and children should be illegal in *most* modern western countries.
So don't tell me what i can judge and what not.
that guy does a lot of tickling videos....f/m's...would he be interested in an m/m video...if the price was right?

