Why is it considered even remotely racist to ask this question? When will we get it that it's OK that we're not all the same. There are physiological differences between a lot of the worlds races!
It's found that the people that inhabit regions closer to the equator have built in defenses against melanoma and malaria VS people who come from the more northern regions who have no defenses like these but have certain immunities against cycle cell.
I've also heard that a study showed that biologically, Native Americans are a number of times more predisposed to alcoholism than Asians because of an certain enzyme found in their system.
This is going to sound weird but...I've had a theory for years that TRUE brunettes have prettier feet (at least the features I would call pretty in a foot) than blonds. My theory is that most brown haired women have lineage from a euro-Mediterranean country..IE: Spain, France, Italy, Greece etc, etc.
Women from these areas tend to have what we Americans call an ethnic look. Meaning, stronger straighter nose, high cheek bones, longer oval face and of course darker olive skin color...so why not a certain foot shape also?
...and if we can agree that it's possible to have a certain shape of nose, lips or foot (long & narrow, high arches and longish toes) in a specifically Geo-ethnic group,.. than without emotional responses and PC leanings...why isn't is posible for a group to have more of the physiological traits that make someone ticklish?
Whether it's more nerve clusters in the ticklish spots or increased sensitivity in the top skin layer or whatever..this is just another biological trait handed down from the former generation.
So I think, by saying that "Asians seem to be more ticklish (per capita)"... could be no worse than saying "Most Asians have darker hair"
It's found that the people that inhabit regions closer to the equator have built in defenses against melanoma and malaria VS people who come from the more northern regions who have no defenses like these but have certain immunities against cycle cell.
I've also heard that a study showed that biologically, Native Americans are a number of times more predisposed to alcoholism than Asians because of an certain enzyme found in their system.
This is going to sound weird but...I've had a theory for years that TRUE brunettes have prettier feet (at least the features I would call pretty in a foot) than blonds. My theory is that most brown haired women have lineage from a euro-Mediterranean country..IE: Spain, France, Italy, Greece etc, etc.
Women from these areas tend to have what we Americans call an ethnic look. Meaning, stronger straighter nose, high cheek bones, longer oval face and of course darker olive skin color...so why not a certain foot shape also?
...and if we can agree that it's possible to have a certain shape of nose, lips or foot (long & narrow, high arches and longish toes) in a specifically Geo-ethnic group,.. than without emotional responses and PC leanings...why isn't is posible for a group to have more of the physiological traits that make someone ticklish?
Whether it's more nerve clusters in the ticklish spots or increased sensitivity in the top skin layer or whatever..this is just another biological trait handed down from the former generation.
So I think, by saying that "Asians seem to be more ticklish (per capita)"... could be no worse than saying "Most Asians have darker hair"