My anime tickling collection

[Redscript]

Better than a 8 year old stuck in a body of a 25 year old, right? It is not the young body that recives the punishment, it's the young mind. This is why it is such a horrible thing.

However your logic that if it looks like it, then it must be it is flawed. It looks like child pornography to you, but maybe not to someone else. I love anime, and I have watched a lot of hentai. The first and third don't even come close to what a child in anime looks like. The second one is a bit grey, but only a bit.

Besides, I have explained why they look like that: asians=small, look younger than they are, and anime= a non detailed style of drawing where it's really hard to tell the age. And, I don't want to start on the chibi style.

However, good job ponting out a loop in the system - as far as I know, the rules apply to people under the age of 18, so yes, your little demon would be eligible for a post.

 

[Skinfan87]

Better than a 8 year old stuck in a body of a 25 year old, right? It is not the young body that recives the punishment, it's the young mind. This is why it is such a horrible thing.

However your logic that if it looks like it, then it must be it is flawed. It looks like child pornography to you, but maybe not to someone else. I love anime, and I have watched a lot of hentai. The first and third don't even come close to what a child in anime looks like. The second one is a bit grey, but only a bit.

Besides, I have explained why they look like that: asians=small, look younger than they are, and anime= a non detailed style of drawing where it's really hard to tell the age. And, I don't want to start on the chibi style.

However, good job ponting out a loop in the system - as far as I know, the rules apply to people under the age of 18, so yes, your little demon would be eligible for a post.

I'm thinking specifically of Sasami from Tenchi Muyo and Rukia from Bleach. Both girls are in fact over the age of 18, but have appearances that would make them appear much younger.

 

[johntfs]

Better than a 8 year old stuck in a body of a 25 year old, right? It is not the young body that recives the punishment, it's the young mind. This is why it is such a horrible thing.

However your logic that if it looks like it, then it must be it is flawed. It looks like child pornography to you, but maybe not to someone else. I love anime, and I have watched a lot of hentai. The first and third don't even come close to what a child in anime looks like. The second one is a bit grey, but only a bit.

Besides, I have explained why they look like that: asians=small, look younger than they are, and anime= a non detailed style of drawing where it's really hard to tell the age. And, I don't want to start on the chibi style.

However, good job ponting out a loop in the system - as far as I know, the rules apply to people under the age of 18, so yes, your little demon would be eligible for a post.

First off, odd as it sounds, the child in an adult's body is acceptable under certain circumstances. Neither Big nor 13 Going on 30 were shut down by the Justice department for show child pornography. Really, the only way you violate the law is by sexualizing the mentally retarded or developmentally disabled. And unless somebody decides to post naked tickling pictures of Corky Thacher from Life Goes On we're probably not going to have to address that situation here on the TMF.

However unfair it may seen, appearence really does matter in this situation. If you had the Tom Hanks and Jennifer Garner characters from the previous movies being tickle-tortured, it wouldn't be a big deal. Why? Because you're show the obviously adult forms of Tom Hanks and Jennifer Garner. If you want to beat off (or otherwise enjoy) that picture, it's fine, because you're all effectively adults. On the other hand, if you want to beat off to something that looks like a ten year old getting molested (even by robot tickle-hands) that is the opposite of fine. And it doesn't matter how much I hear about the cultural nature of anime and chibi artforms, you're still going to be a guy who likes looking at something like kiddie porn.

Besides, you're arguing about this to the wrong person. I'm a fellow tickle-fetish guy. I'm way more open-minded than a lot of people (even though even I am having trouble swallowing your line of reasoning).

Try something if you dare. Print those photos off, show them to random people on the street and then try to explain to them the peculiarities of anime/hentai art and how a ten year old getting pussy-tickled isn't really what it looks like. Tell me how far you get before you get punched, arrested or people just walk off after calling you a sick-ass pedophile.

 

[Darth Godflesh]

Hey there!
Congratulations on your collection
I'm a huge collector too but I missed a few images, thanks for sharing
Best Regards

 

[Lola134]

First off, odd as it sounds, the child in an adult's body is acceptable under certain circumstances. Neither Big nor 13 Going on 30 were shut down by the Justice department for show child pornography. Really, the only way you violate the law is by sexualizing the mentally retarded or developmentally disabled. And unless somebody decides to post naked tickling pictures of Corky Thacher from Life Goes On we're probably not going to have to address that situation here on the TMF.

However unfair it may seen, appearence really does matter in this situation. If you had the Tom Hanks and Jennifer Garner characters from the previous movies being tickle-tortured, it wouldn't be a big deal. Why? Because you're show the obviously adult forms of Tom Hanks and Jennifer Garner. If you want to beat off (or otherwise enjoy) that picture, it's fine, because you're all effectively adults. On the other hand, if you want to beat off to something that looks like a ten year old getting molested (even by robot tickle-hands) that is the opposite of fine. And it doesn't matter how much I hear about the cultural nature of anime and chibi artforms, you're still going to be a guy who likes looking at something like kiddie porn.

Besides, you're arguing about this to the wrong person. I'm a fellow tickle-fetish guy. I'm way more open-minded than a lot of people (even though even I am having trouble swallowing your line of reasoning).

Try something if you dare. Print those photos off, show them to random people on the street and then try to explain to them the peculiarities of anime/hentai art and how a ten year old getting pussy-tickled isn't really what it looks like. Tell me how far you get before you get punched, arrested or people just walk off after calling you a sick-ass pedophile.

I think your taking this way to far and using blind ambition to do the right thing by saying how wrong some of these pictures ar

e. You can seriously make some people feel uncomfortable and like crap. Yes some of them are questionable and as a fellow anime fan I do not ever look at younger aged characters if I can help it on tickling websites when I explore my fetish. HOWEVER once in awhile you'll have 20 something pictures and after that 20 you'll run into 5 that are younger looking characters. My point being is sometimes you run into it you don't want it.

Yes he may should have been more careful about posting some of the characters. But also in his defense the mass number he uploaded he probably didn't go through every single one in the attempt to give you and others a good thing.

So given the small number of the younger looking ones and the ones that were older looking and still underage compared to the older ones I'd say that he is all right. The mods weeded it out and took care of it. You blatant and sort of cruel rebound was unnecessary.

OP: I know you were tired and all sorting out and posting but in favor to just keep you from being a target of attention and stupid ridicule and for mostly again YOU I'd just weed through them a little more. Thank you though I enjoyed most of our collection!

 

[Sandrock74]

However unfair it may seen, appearence really does matter in this situation. If you had the Tom Hanks and Jennifer Garner characters from the previous movies being tickle-tortured, it wouldn't be a big deal. Why? Because you're show the obviously adult forms of Tom Hanks and Jennifer Garner. If you want to beat off (or otherwise enjoy) that picture, it's fine, because you're all effectively adults.

You mean like this picture? LOL

 

[Redscript]

I've been talking with my friend Mistress Aura, and have come to realize that things are a bit different over there. The USA might be slight overzealous in their extermination of child abuse in my eyes, but she said that it's like that over there, and that it's a cultural thing.

Over here we can't stand pedophilia no more that you do, but our tolerance over what is and what isn't is more flexible. I'll give you some gray area examples: -Here it's normal for a high-school girl to date a man in college or even older. The most extreme I've heard is 15 with 25. 16/17 with 22 is common. If it's their choice, they may as well do as they please.

-I've seen 12 year olds go into bars, of their own free will. This is usually the age some of them will start drinking and smoking.

These are examples of the top of my head, but there are more. I'm trying to say that I understand why you acted so aggressively, but do take time the next time and think it trough. Just contact the mods and they'll do their job. I once saw a vid on Youtube where a 10 year old girl was doing self worship, and an adult was filming it. I think she thought it was a game. I didn't write anything in the comments, but I did conntact the Youtube censorship guys.

By all means fight child abuse as much as you can, just keep your head cool when you do it. Besides this isn't the thread for this topic.

 

[masterdude2]

This girl, meanwhile, looks about six.

isn't it Lunar from Seto no Hanayome?
If so she is in High School

 

[Babbles]

I'm sorry, but if it looks like a kid.... Inexcusable.

First off, odd as it sounds, the child in an adult's body is acceptable under certain circumstances. Neither Big nor 13 Going on 30 were shut down by the Justice department for show child pornography. Really, the only way you violate the law is by sexualizing the mentally retarded or developmentally disabled. And unless somebody decides to post naked tickling pictures of Corky Thacher from Life Goes On we're probably not going to have to address that situation here on the TMF.

However unfair it may seen, appearence really does matter in this situation. If you had the Tom Hanks and Jennifer Garner characters from the previous movies being tickle-tortured, it wouldn't be a big deal. Why? Because you're show the obviously adult forms of Tom Hanks and Jennifer Garner. If you want to beat off (or otherwise enjoy) that picture, it's fine, because you're all effectively adults. On the other hand, if you want to beat off to something that looks like a ten year old getting molested (even by robot tickle-hands) that is the opposite of fine. And it doesn't matter how much I hear about the cultural nature of anime and chibi artforms, you're still going to be a guy who likes looking at something like kiddie porn.

Besides, you're arguing about this to the wrong person. I'm a fellow tickle-fetish guy. I'm way more open-minded than a lot of people (even though even I am having trouble swallowing your line of reasoning).

Try something if you dare. Print those photos off, show them to random people on the street and then try to explain to them the peculiarities of anime/hentai art and how a ten year old getting pussy-tickled isn't really what it looks like. Tell me how far you get before you get punched, arrested or people just walk off after calling you a sick-ass pedophile.

Well summed up.

I really like some anime, and came to peek, not to comment, but this got to me.

I was once again truly horrified going through this collection.

I'm sorry, but in *addition to the "smaller" and "younger" faces,
little black bows
on large frilly underwear
beneath flat little chests
with hair divided into pigtails (divided in two, often:; two braids, two pigtails, whatever ---except for Princess Leia, it's usually a marker for "child")

with otherwise un(der)-developed bodies and faces such as the one/s pictured above
are just far too childlike.

And there are way too many pictures like that here.

A picture of what's clearly an adult dressed in a little girl outfit would be fine, a combination of adult kinks is not a big deal.

But when the picture looks like a kid, is dressed like a kid, and is being portrayed in a sexual or pseudo-sexual format, being touched while bound, tickled, whatever, it's sickening.

I'm as much a perv as anyone else here, but I found myself nauseated by & *very angry with the artists of most of these pictures.

Grossly understating, in fact. Trying to remain civil while my baser-but-justified instinct is to beat the living green crap out of whoever would & did portray children (or what looks like a child, the effect is the same....) in this manner.

Try the above suggested litmus test ---- Ask strangers if these are kids in these pictures... and I agree, make sure you do so about a block from your local hospital.

 

[BellybTickler]

Very nice artwork my friend 🙂 you are truly a master of your craft

 

[Skinfan87]

Well summed up.

I really like some anime, and came to peek, not to comment, but this got to me.

I was once again truly horrified going through this collection.

I'm sorry, but in *addition to the "smaller" and "younger" faces,
little black bows
on large frilly underwear
beneath flat little chests
with hair divided into pigtails (divided in two, often:; two braids, two pigtails, whatever ---except for Princess Leia, it's usually a marker for "child")

with otherwise un(der)-developed bodies and faces such as the one/s pictured above
are just far too childlike.

And there are way too many pictures like that here.

A picture of what's clearly an adult dressed in a little girl outfit would be fine, a combination of adult kinks is not a big deal.

But when the picture looks like a kid, is dressed like a kid, and is being portrayed in a sexual or pseudo-sexual format, being touched while bound, tickled, whatever, it's sickening.

I'm as much a perv as anyone else here, but I found myself nauseated by & *very angry with the artists of most of these pictures.

Grossly understating, in fact. Trying to remain civil while my baser-but-justified instinct is to beat the living green crap out of whoever would & did portray children (or what looks like a child, the effect is the same....) in this manner.

Try the above suggested litmus test ---- Ask strangers if these are kids in these pictures... and I agree, make sure you do so about a block from your local hospital.

You know what, we get it! Stop dredging this up Babs, if you've got such a big problem with it, just let a mod know and he will take care of it.

 

[00feather]

ok people with that said let the pics roll in again please

 

[Babbles]

My horse is alive & well, thank you. Freedom of speech apparently isn't.

You know what, we get it! Stop dredging this up Babs, if you've got such a big problem with it, just let a mod know and he will take care of it.

And you are.... and you came from....??? Not that I particularly care.

I posted one comment to this effect in another thread that had similarly inappropriate art, yes. Maybe it was yours?

I post ONE RELEVANT reaction tailored to what I see here,
and you're complaining I'm "dredging up" (!!!) a topic which is not only self-evident here
but in an entirely separate thread.

Who are you to tell anyone whether or not they can comment
however many months later when a similar problem arises?

If you hadn't quoted my ENTIRE post that would've saved half a page.

If you're reacting this vehemently to my one post, which was all I had to say,

I guess you must feel threatened by the potential loss of kiddie porn.

If your next post isn't relevant to the thread, suck it up. I didn't intend to take up more space here.

 

[Redscript]

I guess you must feel threatened by the potential loss of kiddie porn.

That was out of line. Just let the mods do their job. That's what they're here for.

This is a forum for artwork. If this discussion needs to be continued, there is a forum for that. We've hijacked the thread from the original poster. That's wasn't very polite of us, was it now?

 

[Babbles]

That was out of line. Just let the mods do their job. That's what they're here for.

This is a forum for artwork. If this discussion needs to be continued, there is a forum for that. We've hijacked the thread from the original poster. That's wasn't very polite of us, was it now?

I was actually returning to ask the Mods to remove the last 2 posts.

And I'm afraid that was quite in line considering the tone with which I was addressed and the reasons for commenting within this thread,

but I appreciate your attempt at polite resolution, even if it wasn't aimed at the actual aggressor.

 

[NixTickles]

Ok so yeah... this has gotten outta line seriously, I have to ask one thing and maybe say a few things idk im still thinkin bout all that has been said to everyone. I agree with both sides but the way some ppl have been saying things rly is outta line... Child porn should not be tolerated on ne level newhere everyone agrees with this im sure, but picking ppl out and pretty much accusing them of gettin off on it isnt the way to go bout it... that is jsut pointin fingers... the ? i have is would ne of u feel the same way if the girls age is revealed as 18? would u still be pissed of and rant and rave (and basically not do nething that would help the situation) still if the girl was of age?? Since we dont know the age regardless we should assume she is underage and let the mods know, we dont have to start WWIII because we all think diff about it...

If it bothers you then tell the mods, if u feel that it could be child porn then plz contact the mods and let them do the research or wutever they do to make the decisions and deal with it... but basically fightin back and forth with each other making enemies is not goin to solve this problem and just prove how ignorant you can be no matter how valiant or righteous u think it makes you.

I agree that anime a lot of girls do look younger than they appear, but if there is no age to go with the pic then we should assume the character(s) is under age and rteport it to the mods. We all live,think, act, and react diff to life and situations around us, plz dont create an unessacary situation out of something that can be handled in a much simple manner where no one has to get angry, hurt, or accused.

We are adults here (i am assuming) and we should act like them!

But i like the pics of wut i have seen its a great collection so far.

 

[Babbles]

As I mentioned, I did just PM HDS with a request to remove the non-relevant posts, -----including mine, including this one,

as well as that of the individual who decided to pick a fight for no reason except apparently he feels he can decide who can comment and who can't.

Otherwise, on topic --- I actually do consider this "kiddie porn," I'm not just being "righteous," it's clear these are under-developed children's bodies,
I don't care how old they're supposed to be, it's what's depicted that's disturbing.
I'd simply refrained from using the term until I was rudely provoked.

 

[Skinfan87]

Babs,

You're one of the reasons why I post more at another board rather than this. You are acting so damn elitist it is ridiculous accusing me of trying to right the ship from something that had already been mentioned once and put to bed before you came in and dredged it back up.

Yes, I'm well aware of the underage policy, but I've also believed that its a bit too overreaching when it comes to fictional characters when it comes to art and stories. But I realize I'm in the minority on that. In short I respectfully disagree with this policy and I resent someone basically calling me a pedophile for no apparent reason.

I was not picking a fight, I was just saying that if you had a problem with it, just contact HDS or someone else and get those pics removed without making a bigger deal out of this than it needs to be. Which YOU did Babs. Taking words I wrote and twisting theme to a tune that exists only in your mind.

 

[General Zod]

Should I even post anymore?
What do you think?

Yes please

A piece of advice if I may..................

Please find out if you can if the art you wanna post is of an under aged character if you can

 

[Cosmo_ac]

Yes please

A piece of advice if I may..................

Please find out if you can if the art you wanna post is of an under aged character if you can

I would actually advise one step further and make sure any pictures pressent have notable breasts, as thats probably the most obvious thing as a tell for charactor age.

For the record though, as a long time anime fan, I will also attest to the fact that their are deffinitly anime charactors who are of age, but do to charactor design, would pass for underage at a glance.

 

[johntfs]

Should I even post anymore?
What do you think?

For all his harshness, Babbles gave you a pretty damn good checklist which I'll quote below:

I'm sorry, but in *addition to the "smaller" and "younger" faces,
little black bows
on large frilly underwear
beneath flat little chests
with hair divided into pigtails (divided in two, often:; two braids, two pigtails, whatever ---except for Princess Leia, it's usually a marker for "child")

with otherwise un(der)-developed bodies and faces such as the one/s pictured above

You have more than one or two of the above criteria met in a picture, you probably shouldn't post it here. In naked pictures, make sure there's at least a little bit of pubic hair, as well. Basically, make sure that the people in any pics you post clearly appear to have at least started going through puberty. I can live with fantasy jailbait, but please don't turn me into a child fucker, even by proxy.

 

[gadren]

Starting up again with group 90

I REALLY like the sci-fi alien one. Only thing that would be better is if they looked a bit more like they were laughing.

 

[Raytheon]

thank you very much for the awesome updates 🙂 its something i really look forward to

 

[johntfs]

As someone who was critical of your postings earlier, I'll say that you've done well now. These are hot, sexy tickling pictures of girls who can at least pass for eighteen. Thank you.

 

[tklphile1]

Wounderful collection. Very hot.