New Clip Store PREVIEW

[laney]

Really? Are you going to have these girls sign releases while telling them exactly what the videos are for, including the fact that you'll make money from selling them and that they're actually meant to be fetish videos? You think many random girls will be ok with this?

Absolutley with a big sign that says get in the chair and have your feet tickled for 5 minutes for X amount of $

 

[The Last Laugh]

Absolutley with a big sign that says get in the chair and have your feet tickled for 5 minutes for X amount of $

But will they be told what the videos are for? I mean exactly what they're for? I'm really sorry to sound like such a downer, but it's just that I've seen a number of producers who obviously didn't tell the models everything they needed to know. Hell, some don't even ask for their permission when they film them and they still sell the footage to a fetishist clientele, which is a thoroughly dishonest practice in my opinion. Very wrong. I just want to make sure the models know what they're getting into. It's not always an easy thing to explain to standard candidates, let alone with random girls who do it on a whim. And just explaining it isn't quite enough. You need to make sure they really understand what you mean so that they can make an informed decision about participating or not.

As you can see, it's really important to me to be totally open with the models, no what matter the circumstances of a shoot. If I didn't care about that, I must have 10-15 hours of material I shot for myself in the past (mostly foot stuff, plus some tickling) that I could easily have added to my catalog. But I don't do so because I certainly didn't get the models' permission to do that. Ahem, to be perfectly honest, most didn't really know the real reason why I filmed them, and I admit that in a few cases they weren't even aware of it at all. Not exactly the proudest moments of my youth, I have to say. But at least I didn't distribute that footage.

 

[Darkknight]

Well tickling has nothing to do with acting. At the same time your honesty is certainly appreciated. I think I blind person can see that she was the least ticklish of the 3. Keep in mind some people with not give you that great ticklish laughter and instead will squirm and squeal or squeak. But no acting no.

On a tickle scale of 1-10 they were as follows:

Kimberly-10
Megan-8
Sophia-6

It figures my Ecuadorian gal wasn't that ticklish on her feet but it was still cool to see and she'll go in my "The only Ecuadorian ticklee ever!" folder. 😉

Kimberly and Megan seem to be big time favorites so time to try those.

DK

 

[tkl-pen]

I quite liked the Ecuadorian girl even though she wasn't as ticklish - she was very pretty.

 

[laney]

But will they be told what the videos are for? I mean exactly what they're for? I'm really sorry to sound like such a downer, but it's just that I've seen a number of producers who obviously didn't tell the models everything they needed to know. Hell, some don't even ask for their permission when they film them and they still sell the footage to a fetishist clientele, which is a thoroughly dishonest practice in my opinion. Very wrong. I just want to make sure the models know what they're getting into. It's not always an easy thing to explain to standard candidates, let alone with random girls who do it on a whim. And just explaining it isn't quite enough. You need to make sure they really understand what you mean so that they can make an informed decision about participating or not.

As you can see, it's really important to me to be totally open with the models, no what matter the circumstances of a shoot. If I didn't care about that, I must have 10-15 hours of material I shot for myself in the past (mostly foot stuff, plus some tickling) that I could easily have added to my catalog. But I don't do so because I certainly didn't get the models' permission to do that. Ahem, to be perfectly honest, most didn't really know the real reason why I filmed them, and I admit that in a few cases they weren't even aware of it at all. Not exactly the proudest moments of my youth, I have to say. But at least I didn't distribute that footage.

Well Unlike you we have NEVER filmed anyone without knowing what it was about or where it was going to be sold and that will never change. I hope that answers your question. Also I don't think its cool for producers to jump into another producers thread unless its completely positive. I thought that crap stopped a year ago.

 

[The Last Laugh]

Well Unlike you we have NEVER filmed anyone without knowing what it was about or where it was going to be sold and that will never change. I hope that answers your question. Also I don't think its cool for producers to jump into another producers thread unless its completely positive. I thought that crap stopped a year ago.

Oh, wow, touchy. And accusatory, too. What does it matter if I'm another producer? Is there a rule about that? It's not like I was saying that your material sucks. I was bringing up a serious, legitimate issue. If you have a moral/ethical question about my own business practices one day, feel free to bring it up. It would be justified.

Who said I was accusing you of anything? Yes, I was a bit suspicious at first, which is why I asked the question to clarify the issue. I was just asking to make sure everything was ok for the models, which should always be a top priority for any producer. You have to understand that not everyone is totally honest with them. While I now accept that you are (and, frankly, I congratulate you for it), you have to admit that it's not obvious at all at first, considering what you have in mind. I seriously doubt that the percentage of girls that will be ok with everything will be very high, and since I can't imagine having a big sign that explains it in detail, it might turn out to be a delicate, awkward process to have to explain it to each interested candidate on the spot, more or less in public. Hell, I personally couldn't stand having to deal with the shock and possible disgust of many people in one day. I'm sure there are other producers who would try to make it easier for themselves by not telling the models the whole story. Also, it might actually be a bit risky, you know, if someone takes offense to what you're doing and decides that calling security would be the right thing to do. It wouldn't be the first time someone did something like that. Not that it would necessarily lead to actual trouble, but it would still be painful, and who knows, you might be asked to leave.

If you're annoyed that I'm trying to make sure the models are treated in a fair and honest way, well, that's unfortunate. I, personally, don't feel the need to apologize for that.

As for my taking pictures and filming people when I was a young lad, I would thank you for not using that to make me sound like a bad guy. Again, not my proudest moments, but that was a long time ago, I haven't done that in many, many years, and like I said, I never distributed that material. Besides, I doubt I'm the only foot/tickling fan who captured such material for personal use at one point of their lives. This is not an excuse, you understand. I know it was kind of lame of me to do so. But I still think it's not a big offense. Selling such material without the models' permission and without making absolutely sure they understand what they're getting into, however, would be unexcusable. I'm very glad to hear you agree with me. Frankly, I thought that you might try to avoid my question (you wouldn't be the first), but you're obviously very transparent about what you do, and I can appreciate that.

 

[chrisheaven]

Laney-- your stuff is always great without exception--- many thanks for posting
Will PM you about the previews - i have a couple of questions if that's OK

 

[Nylon tickler]

Oh yes for sure there will be Nylon feet tickling in the renfaire chair upcoming.

i can't wait to see many nylon tickling clips in the future! 😀 I would like to see when the girls wearing tan sheer nylons/stockings or pantyhose 😉

Sheers!