Opinions About Nude Tickling

[crazyjose]

Would some of you mind sharing your thoughts about ticklees being nude or partly nude please. Our regular, in house girls (and guys) have no problem doing either but of course we have to pay them more accordingly. What I am interested in determining is whether it's a waste of money and are tickle enthusiasts equally as happy seeing fully clothed victims, partially clothed etc.

 

[Gadilici]

I like both, but have a distinct preference for non-nude. I have bought plenty of nude clips, tho.

Biggest thing is the quality of the tickling. I should want the video regardless of what she is or is not wearing.

But IMO, no, it wouldn't be a waste of money. Might be a mistake to produce more of that sort than nekkid, but it's certainly got a market. And you may find additional models if nudity isn't required. Only responses I've gotten since moving to Virginia were non-nude girls.

Thanks for asking 🙂

Christopher

 

[rhiannon]

I am totally for nude tickling. It's my favorite, makes the lee more helpless, all spots can be reached. I prefer to be tickled nude myself.

 

[Amanda Cortez]

Yeah, nude is the best, I like it too. It's so much more erotic and you feel so helpless and vulnerable when being tied down nude. It's juz so fucken much fun

 

[Raytheon]

To me it depends on the scene being made. In my opinion a fun college girl tickle fight doesn't need hardcore bondage and nudity. Where as say a baby oil covered dungeon scene might. From a company point of view i think the audiences taste can vary so much it would be an advantage to cover both aspects.
my 2 cents
Ray

 

[Em Es]

Both participants wearing nothing but a g-string/thong

Just as people in a nudist colony are not necessarily having an orgy, I like stripping down for tickle play not necessarily as a warm-up for sex but because it's part of how uninhibited I feel when tickling a woman. So I like wearing as little as a thong unless the girl with whom I play objects.

Another reason I like to wear so little is I will overheat should I keep my clothes on!

As for the woman I tickle/tickling me, if she's game I'd like her in a g-string, as I would want her to lose her inhibitions, too. Also, as I tickle only women I find attractive, the eye candy would make it that much more memorable, but please know I respect a woman's limits.

A female tickle buddy I was tickling a couple of years ago said "No" to my thong but allowed me to wear just a Speedo. (She wore bikinis or equally flattering two-piece athletic attire.)

Rather than hope to find a lover who also satisfies your tickling desire, I've come to believe having a platonic tickle buddy on the side works best in the long run.

 

[ViperGTS]

I personally enjoy my lee to be nude, or close to it. It's just a preference. It's easier to tickle a nude lee, as well as sexier.

 

[TicklesFemales]

I personally like tickling a nude lady as you can get to all ticklish places that way. However it depends on the lady to and her comfort level with it. Anything done between two adults should be consensual when you are having a tickling session.

 

[Maestro1874]

It is a personal preference, but in general won't buy anything without nudity. 🙂 And as a ler or lee I prefer no clothing in the way.

 

[P[a]pi]

I like clothes, outfits, shoes, socks, boots, etc.

I only wanna see my wife's nude body and private areas, nobody else's.

 

[Gadilici]

Thats's sweet, Papi.

Christopher

 

[Capnmad]

I would follow this rule: If it's not exposed, it might be tickled, and if it is exposed, it must be tickled.

Then decide if clothed or nude tickling is right for your company.

Exposure without tickling seems more a tease than actual content change.

 

[yesyes]

Nude is great to do, but when tickling or bondage is depicted in artwork, I prefer some amount of clothing, even it is only lingerie.

Clothing in a scene is not about what you can see, it is about you can't see. For instance, if a tight pair of low-cut, ass-hugging shorts shows you most of a girl's tail end, then your mind is enticed to inquire about those last few bits of information - it is a visual tease.

 

[Francie_Pants]

I like to see both clothed and nude/partly nude 'lees, but I do lean toward the former.

Why do I say that? Well, there's the old line about leaving more to the imagination - but that's not the main reason. It's more that the clothed 'lee is a more realistic scenario. Actually, I prefer them to start out wearing clothes and then progress to nudity; that's my idea of a good video. For me, it's just not as interesting if they're nude right from the start.

I second that one. Gradual removal of clothing adds to the intensity, as well as the ticklee's sense of utter helplessness. Plus, it's pretty crazy what it feels like to have hands trapped inside your shirt, wiggling and moving all around, and all the movements you make just pull the hands around with you. 😛

 

[Tickle Abuse]

I would follow this rule: If it's not exposed, it might be tickled, and if it is exposed, it must be tickled.

Then decide if clothed or nude tickling is right for your company.

Exposure without tickling seems more a tease than actual content change.

Can I use that? Brilliant! I resisted nudity for a long time, a few years, then I said to myself, "wtf are you thinking! of course have naked women tickled!" I think however that it depends on the chemistry between the lee and ler, if there is no chemistry, it just isn't as sexy as it could be.

 

[The Last Laugh]

I'm not interested in nudity in tickling videos. To me, having the ticklees keep their clothes on (except their footwear) makes it easier to identify with the models and situations, since it's closer to an ordinary, everyday situation for most people, including myself. I mean, when I was younger and had a bit of tickling fun with friends, they weren't exactly nude. So when there's clothed tickling going on, it's easier for me to remember those good old times.

I also feel the "innocence" of it makes it more appealing. After all, to most of us, tickling is erotic to some extent, right? Well, the way I see it, as far as "erotic" is concerned, nudity is just too obvious. To me it makes a special scene appear too bland, because there SO MUCH nudity all over the place. Same old same old. But to see it done to an ordinary, fully clothed ticklee, who doesn't seem to be in "sex mode", almost seems more naughty to me. I don't know, it's just how I feel.

 

[crazyjose]

thanks very much to everyone that responded. It seems that the opinions vary as much as in every day life situations. I suppose the best thing to do is offer as much variety as possible. You guys are great....Cheers

 

[SillyMan]

I think a clothed lee can be very sexy - ex. when she bucks and the t-shirt glides up and exposes the bellybutton, it's so cute.

 

[naths]

no problem for me hehehheheheh

 

[tkrunner]

As a guy I prefer to see nude female 'lees, and sometimes nude guy 'lees. But it does depend on the situation. If it's just a small tickle fight, or tickle for fun then nude exposure isn't needed. But if a 'lee is tied down for a nice long tickling, then Im all for nude, or bikini/underwear.

 

[Mystery2009]

Well, I don't really order clips, but I would say that there is a market for both. Some people like there action a little more hardcore so the nude stuff would appeal to them, while the none nude fans would like the stuff without nudity. In the long run I would think that the more diverse you make your product the bigger your fan base will be, and the more money you will make. After all how much money would "Dunkin' Donuts" make if they only sold one type of donut.