They censor Malone because he's peddling misinformation. Source -
https://www.politifact.com/article/2022/jan/06/who-robert-malone-joe-rogans-guest-was-vaccine-sci/
"In June, he tweeted that a study showed that for every three lives the vaccines saved, they caused two deaths. But the journal that published the study later appended a note to it calling its main conclusion incorrect, and then retracted it entirely."
"The same month, PolitiFact rated False a video featuring Malone that claimed the spike proteins generated after vaccination are toxic to cells. Other fact-checkers debunked his related claim in another video that the spike proteins often cause irreparable damage to children’s vital organs."
"And he said on Fox News host Sean Hannity’s radio show that the vaccines "created a whole huge bunch of super spreaders. So the truth is, it's the unvaccinated that are at risk from the vaccinated." That’s False."
"Speaking to Rogan, Malone said it’s "nucking futs" for people who have had COVID-19 to get vaccinated. He cited the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, an unverified database that cannot be used to assess causality, and claimed that it shows an "explosion of vaccine-associated deaths." (It does not)"
"He said hospitals are so financially incentivized to claim COVID-19 as the cause of patient deaths that a hypothetical patient "with a bullet hole to the head" would be ruled as a COVID-19 fatality if they tested positive. (This is wrong; if anything, research indicates that COVID-19 deaths have been undercounted.)"
And it goes on from there.
If you're already inclined to be anti-vax and believe conspiracies, then Malone is a great voice to support your existing belief system.
But from a purely factual standpoint of trying to assess the truth of things, he's clearly a dubious source at best. And since this is a life and death pandemic, he gets booted from some social media platforms.
And the idea that they're doing it because of some agenda, like a financial incentive, is really misguided because if you remember, they were happily allowing anyone to say anything for a very long time. It was public pressure that forced them to eventually start shutting down accounts that spread verifiably untrue claims. If it was up to twitter and facebook, who only care about clicks, they'd let everyone say anything they want about any topic.
I'll agree that Big Pharma by itself is not a reliable source about the efficacy of their own products. But when you then throw in the entire media, the CDC, NIH, WHO, and the entire government, as all being part of the same conspiracy to make you take medicine that isn't actually good for you, you've gone down a very deep rabbit hole with a low level of probability.
If you've ever heard of Occam's Razor, the principle that the explanation which requires the fewest assumptions is most likely to be the right one, in this case it would tell you that the reason over 90% of the experts in the world are telling people to get vaccinated is because it's the correct thing to do.
It reminds me a little of 9/11 conspiracies. Sure, you can find an engineer or two around the world who will tell you that airplane fuel cannot melt steel beams. But the vast majority of them will explain how it happened, and show the math that got them there.
Same thing here - you can find a FEW experts to contradict the vaccine science. But the vast majority of them will show the math that supports it.
Everyone is obviously free to believe what they want. But there's not a lot of science or logic there to support it.