Question about AI generator

[proud2tickle]

I want to start writing stories to post here. Problem is I am usually very busy with work and I would like to use AI to help reduce the time and cover the grammar portion too. Does anyone have any suggestions or recommendations on how why app/program/platform they use?

 

[Trethezeldafan]

I’m currently using this: https://flowgpt.com/chat/WL07drv69Q_kGr77fobmV

 

[BlueLine7045]

Why do you have to use AI to write because you're busy? Just write at your own pace, or when you're free. A lot of people and authors work full time and write in their free time. Your story doesn't have to be done in a day. It can take a week, a month, etc. Just write at your own pace, but make sure it's yours.

 

[suikoden]

I’m currently using this: https://flowgpt.com/chat/WL07drv69Q_kGr77fobmV

This is a new one to me. How does it work? I tried Novel AI for non-kink writing but wasn't too impressed. ChatGPT is a bit too prudish and won't allow anything with intimate contact (violence and murder seem to be ok though... whatever).

 

[Trethezeldafan]

This is a new one to me. How does it work? I tried Novel AI for non-kink writing but wasn't too impressed. ChatGPT is a bit too prudish and won't allow anything with intimate contact (violence and murder seem to be ok though... whatever).

It’s a bot designed for Erotic stories. Works pretty good

 

[lois333]

Apparently Ticklemang's last story was made only with AI and it was pretty damn good, you should ask him/her

 

[Ticklemang]

Thanks for the plug Lois. I do have to make edits to the stories generated by AI though, since it’s creative writing capabilities are a bit limited, but it’s not necessary if you’re okay with some repetitive stuff.

I use openrouter with the model “grok 2 1212”.

I’ve used tons of the models and small ones (smaller than 100B) are not worth it. Grok 3 can also be used in the online interface but the free usage limits are debilitating.

In terms of writing smut and writing it well, grok is by far the best model. All the other models that are good at writing (chatGPT, Claude, etc) won’t write anything smutty or nonconsensual

 

[Trethezeldafan]

Thanks for the plug Lois. I do have to make edits to the stories generated by AI though, since it’s creative writing capabilities are a bit limited, but it’s not necessary if you’re okay with some repetitive stuff.

I use openrouter with the model “grok 2 1212”.

I’ve used tons of the models and small ones (smaller than 100B) are not worth it. Grok 3 can also be used in the online interface but the free usage limits are debilitating.

In terms of writing smut and writing it well, grok is by far the best model. All the other models that are good at writing (chatGPT, Claude, etc) won’t write anything smutty or nonconsensual

If it’s no problem I posted a story that an AI did for me…can you read?

 

[com_tklr]

I’m currently using this: https://flowgpt.com/chat/WL07drv69Q_kGr77fobmV

I tried using this but it just keeps getting me back to the original input page.

Has anyone tried using My Spicy Vanilla? https://myspicyvanilla.com/

 

[Ticklemang]

If it’s no problem I posted a story that an AI did for me…can you read?

Just went and read it (the Madison Pettis one right?).
It’s pretty good, I’m not exactly sure what kind of feedback you’re looking for but I guess if you want to improve it, I would recommend giving a pass over once you’re finished with the AI to remove some AI platitudes that they always include. Or if you don’t care to do that it’s still a good story haha.

One thing that’s funny about AI is the writing is probably a 6 or 7 out of 10. Which is not great but at the same time most people’s writing is going to be worse than that.

 

[Trethezeldafan]

I tried using this but it just keeps getting me back to the original input page.

Has anyone tried using My Spicy Vanilla? https://myspicyvanilla.com/

Like the intro?

 

[com_tklr]

Yes. It'll ask me for a title or suggestion, then after a minute of saying it's typing, it'll give me an error message and ask me again. After I do it again (and get the same error message) I try a third time. I had to sign up after that before I was able to receive a response.

 

[Trethezeldafan]

Yes. It'll ask me for a title or suggestion, then after a minute of saying it's typing, it'll give me an error message and ask me again. After I do it again (and get the same error message) I try a third time. I had to sign up after that before I was able to receive a response.

Also another tip if you go to the right click on settings and change the AI to the Apollo version. The site offers good deals on coins bro

 

[Chittbom]

Thank you for this information

 

[kptjnr]

As a reader, if I see an author using AI, I just block them. Don't want to read anything they wrote if there is any risk it didn't come from a human. (I usually run a paragraph through GPTzero if I'm in doubt).

I read the stories here because I want to immerse myself in the ideas, creativity and desire of the author. When I read a story about someone getting tickled, I want to know that the author is relishing in their predicament. I want to know that the themes in the story comes from a real human's desire to tickle someone, or to be tickled. An AI can never give me that.

Besides, why should I read something that someone else could not even be bothered to write?

 

[Ticklemang]

I read the stories here because I want to immerse myself in the ideas, creativity and desire of the author. When I read a story about someone getting tickled, I want to know that the author is relishing in their predicament. I want to know that the themes in the story comes from a real human's desire to tickle someone, or to be tickled. An AI can never give me that.

Besides, why should I read something that someone else could not even be bothered to write?

Lol if you could see the chat logs to get an AI to write a story like a few of the ones I’ve posted on here, they are longer and more descriptive than most of the stories that get posted here and are written by humans.

It’s definitely possible to combine your own creativity and ingenuity with that of an AI to create a story of roughly equal quality as you would be able to write, much faster than you would be able to write it.

Unfortunately it looks like most people who use AI to write stories do so without putting in very much effort and you can tell from the end result, but that’s not an indictment against LLMs as a tool as much as it is user error/laziness.

All that to say using an LLM to fill in details around a plot core shouldn’t take away any of the passion someone has for the subject.

BTW GPTZero is terrible at guessing what is created by an LLM. I could go into more details on why if you’re interested since I work on AI at big tech but for the sake of this comment I’ll just say it’s wildly inaccurate at best and you’re better off relying on your own intuition for creative writing.

 

[PeterVincentTGVK]

As a reader, if I see an author using AI, I just block them. Don't want to read anything they wrote if there is any risk it didn't come from a human. (I usually run a paragraph through GPTzero if I'm in doubt).

I read the stories here because I want to immerse myself in the ideas, creativity and desire of the author. When I read a story about someone getting tickled, I want to know that the author is relishing in their predicament. I want to know that the themes in the story comes from a real human's desire to tickle someone, or to be tickled. An AI can never give me that.

Besides, why should I read something that someone else could not even be bothered to write?

This.

 

[suikoden]

I think a GPT can be useful in helping develop a scenario or putting detail around a setting if you want to set a story in an environment you've never visited or with elements of a subject you don't know much about it. Let's say you wanted to see a tickling story set during the Fasnet carnivals in Southern Germany where young women regularly get 'kidnapped' by witches and fools and have their shoes stolen. Or you wanted to combine a voodoo story with tickling. A GPT can be a massive time saver in researching what you should include for authenticity.

I look at this the same way comic book artists used to have what they called 'morgue' files. They'd collect all sorts of magazine clippings of locations, costumes, machines, weapons. Trips to the library and xerox machines were very necessary. Now we have image search, pinterest, stock image resources and all of this is much easier. A GPT can be used for the same functions.

When it comes to dialogue, characters and actions, I think it's more fun and also more rewarding for the reader to know that the writer has put time and effort into crafting these things themselves. I see some prolific new writers here but I don't tend to look at their work as it's on the same level as going on deviantART and seeing an account with hundreds of pieces posted per day because they are using image generational tools. I'll take pen on paper or stylus on tablet over that any day of the week.

 

[rdbaseballplay]

As a reader, if I see an author using AI, I just block them. Don't want to read anything they wrote if there is any risk it didn't come from a human. (I usually run a paragraph through GPTzero if I'm in doubt).

If you can't tell without using a tool, does it matter? To some extent, I'm with you, if I see the markings of AI slop, then I close the tab right away. But it's porn we're talking about. Real art, yes, people pour their human experience into those things and you lose all of that when you take the human out of the process.

In a more general sense, I feel like we're arguing about whether a man or machine can cook the best mcdonalds hamburger. No one goes to mcdonalds expecting a good burger. In the same way, our tickle porn isn't going to be remembered for its elegant prose or character driven story arcs (unless you are teeheelawrence or one of the few actually good writers).

I think a GPT can be useful in helping develop a scenario or putting detail around a setting

Well put, AI is a tool to use, not a replacement for the human mind. Low effort will produce garbage no matter what tools you use, but high effort (I would argue Ticklemang falls into this category) produces better results, again, no matter what tools you use.

BTW GPTZero is terrible at guessing what is created by an LLM

I've found it's hit or miss. It guessed grok 3 generated stuff pretty consistently, however, claude 3 and other less known AI writing tools seemed to trick it. Stuff written by me was mostly guessed correctly.