Question here....

[robmic]

Me being an "old guy" here, is it just me, or are there anyone else that loves to see pretty women without ink all over their bodies? For me, even when I see a beautiful gal that is someone that would be a person that could be someone that would be fun to tickle, when I see their body covered with ink, it's a turnoff to me. I see a beautiful body and think, "why would they ruin it with that"! I guess I'm just old school. Anyone else think that way?

 

[shark]

I don't mind tatting, as long as it's not on the face or "all over". I do know another guy who won't even look at strippers anymore, since tatting is so prevalent now.

 

[sttklr]

I prefer no ink myself.

 

[Wesker28]

Me being an "old guy" here, is it just me, or are there anyone else that loves to see pretty women without ink all over their bodies? For me, even when I see a beautiful gal that is someone that would be a person that could be someone that would be fun to tickle, when I see their body covered with ink, it's a turnoff to me. I see a beautiful body and think, "why would they ruin it with that"! I guess I'm just old school. Anyone else think that way?

I completely agree with you.

 

[Fat Bastard]

Not a big fan of ink. But I always found it fascinating that Kat Von D was completely covered with the exception of one area. Too ticklish?

 

[boyne4]

I am not into girls with ink

 

[the tickleshow]

I'm fine with ink. A foot tattoo can be incredibly sexy.