One of the things i've learned over the years, is that part of me really likes there to be a reason for the tickling in tickling fiction. Maybe the tickler can't leave any marks on the victom, or maybe the torturer has a soft spot for the victom and uses tickling instead of hot pokers, or a milling other reasons out there. But, part of me also likes the tickling for no reason, like you might see in some fiction and comics. There's no reason why this char is going to tickle this other char, asside from the fact the tickler likes to tickle. It's like somebody said "We don't need an excuse to have tickling!" And then tickling happens. You see this a lot in comics, but also a lot in tickle-fiction quickies.
Personally, i sometimes feel like my writing is restrained because of my want to have a legitimate, or at least semi-legitimate reason for the tickling to happen. I don't know. I guess i just want general thoughts on what people like and why. Does having a reason for the tickling make it more real to you, or do you like there to be just tickling because to hell with it, your reading a work of fiction anyway?
Thoughts and comments appreciated.
Personally, i sometimes feel like my writing is restrained because of my want to have a legitimate, or at least semi-legitimate reason for the tickling to happen. I don't know. I guess i just want general thoughts on what people like and why. Does having a reason for the tickling make it more real to you, or do you like there to be just tickling because to hell with it, your reading a work of fiction anyway?
Thoughts and comments appreciated.



