Cheshire_Cat_21 said:
According to almost all dictionary definitions, religion is a system of belief in a God or Gods. Christianity is a religion. Buddhism has no gods, miracles or leaps of faith and was started by an individual with a recorded and confirmed birthdate and deathdate, its a philosophy....they are two very different things. Not trying to start an argument or anything just stating a fact....
Of course the US Government considers it a religion.....which makes no sense since Wicca and Paeganism are still not recognized and do consider themselves to be religions.......
Sigh...somehow I knew you'd go here. It was evident in your defense of Buddism before anyone else had replied. You seemed almost paranoid about it. You do this every time, you know. "Buddism isn't like..." and then you go into a brief little number about how it's different, and when I attempt to bridge a gap and show a common cause, you do this.
I'm not mad at you, my friend. Just a little disappointed.
What you believe would be a religion regardless of what the U.S has to say because...
" Religion
1. Belief in and reverence for a supernatural power or powers regarded as creator and governor of the universe.
2. A personal or institutionalized system grounded in such belief and worship.
3. The life or condition of a person in a religious order.
4. A set of beliefs, values, and practices based on the teachings of a spiritual leader.
5. A cause, principle, or activity pursued with zeal or conscientious devotion."
That's the definition of the religion.
Thereby the definition of "religion", especially the part that I made bold, clearly states that what you are doing and believe is just as much a religion as what I or anyone else is doing who is not of the Buddhist faith. Furthermore, you have temples. That technically, in the eyes of the law, makes you a religious order and congregation, even a sect, since just like christianity, there are different branches and differnet temples of/for buddism as well. If it was just one temple where everyone went then maybe it would be different. But thats not the case for you or me or anyone. It can't be seeing as how these beliefs are everywhere.
Your religion is structured, dare I say organized, just as much as anyone else's, at least on a superficial level. It needs to be to operate in this society, unfortunately.
This is why I made a clear distinction (and always do) between faith, spiritual life, and religion. We all have a "religion", but what you and I are talking about it (and what this thread is about actually) does not concern that aspect, yet you seem to always make it about religion and those differences.
We are all one in spirit, and thats not something I see a whole lot of people saying or admitting.
EDIT: As for my God, you seem to be hung up (alot of people are) on the idea that just because he lived a mortal life (in one form) that his mere existance is our belief and cause and that all of what we believe is dependant on his existance being proven and his miracles validated. It is what he did and said during that time on Earth, what he preached, which is of the greatest significance, and, ultimately, his sacrifice.
Its really no different than Buddha, really. Jesus is likened to a wise sage, because he is one, and thereby, he is just as legitimate as Buddha would be; and his messeges and words of wisdom just as rightious and very similar if not exactly the same.