Things that Piss you off...

[general zod1]

By commenting..you must of watched me drive. Actually..Speeding and Changing lanes all time is me...tailgating..naww..i call it drafting others..lol..j/k..actually tight curves were cars act like idiots and I know semis have trouble getting around...I run blocker and hold the others at bay and when it comes to the straight away I hammer it and leave the suckers behind. 😀

No I haven't been in Ohio in awhile :weird: Another thing that pisses me off is split speed limits for cars and trucks

 

[GEORGIATKLER]

No Tax Credit For Stupidity????????????????????

Friggin' Mirrors And Gravity!!! Lol! I Piss Myself Off When I Don't Count My Blessings As I Should. Children/elderly/women Who Have Been Abused Physically, Sexually, And/or Emotionally. Picking On Those Who Can Least Defend Themselves Makes The Devil Proud. Hey Bunny Babe, Don't They Realize Each Pizza You Have Anything To Do With Is Already De Facto Special? Jeff, You Da' Man!!!

 

[OBleedingMe]

Environmentalists. Especially ones who bug me about my 1967 Shelby GT500. I don't bother them about their death-trap electric cars, I don't know why they have to harass me and call me facist when they are in fact the ones torching homes and upscale developments they don't like. Doesn't sound very democratic to me.

Pacifists. Violence IS a solution. We ended WWII with it.

Socialists, Anarchists, and Communists. Socialist countries are not productive. They do nothing but produce just enough to stay afloat and feed off the capitalist countries who are moving the world forward. Communism steals all your personal property and gives it to the government. I don't trust them with my SS pay, let alone my PROPERTY. Just read up on the Soviet Union. Didn't work out, did it? Anarchism, like pacifism, is impossible to acheive. There always must be a presence of organization/government/authority. There will ALWAYS be people in the world who are twisted and sick and greedy and want to hurt others. We need protection from these people.

Neo-feminists. Those feminist who claim female supremacy. Quite amusing. I suppose that's why men have always controlled the world fromt he time we were tribal communes. I'm not saying women are inferior, but they certainly are not superior.

Buffy, Xena, Kill Bill. Any movie where a woman one-third the weight and strength of the man can magically kick the ever-loving crap out of guys 200 lb. bigger than them. Women beating the crap out of an endless stream of men seem to be the norm for hollywood as of late. Sounds like penis guilt or envy, depending on the gender, to me. When they make a movie that stars a male hero constantly kicking the crap out of an endless stream of women, I'll believe they have a semblence of equality. This message of physical dominance gives women in the real world a false sense of impowerment. A woman cannot, in 99% of all cases, overpower a man. Yeah, you can find the exception to the rule every once in a blue moon - like a 100 lb. crack head getting sat on by a 300 lb. woman, but that is not the norm. If it were, women would not be beaten and raped. Self-defense classes would not teach women to do anything they can to get away from their attackers and RUN, because you may be able to stun him (mace), but you won't be able to beat him.

BDSM Players who let their bedroom activities run into their real life situations. Nothing like walking into a BDSM club and having to deal with some dominatrix tell me I am truly submissive (yeah right!), all men are. I usually counter with the argument that if you can beat me down, then you can tie me down. No one has challenged me as of yet. I'm a strong guy. I tolerate their lifestyle, I don't know why they can't tolerate mine. You'd think an alienated subculture like BDSM would be more open and accepting. Not so, unfortunately.

Ah, that felt good. Nice venting session.

 

[CellarDweller]

Not trying to start trouble, just wanted to reply.

Buffy, Xena, Kill Bill. Any movie where a woman one-third the weight and strength of the man can magically kick the ever-loving crap out of guys 200 lb. bigger than them. Women beating the crap out of an endless stream of men seem to be the norm for hollywood as of late. Sounds like penis guilt or envy, depending on the gender, to me.

Never saw Kill Bill. In regards to Xena & Buffy, the whole point of those shows were that they were science fiction, and the lead characters had increased/enhanced strenght and abiliites. Doesn't seem to be any different to me from movies like "Die Hard" or "Rambo" where one man with an endless supply of bullets takes out everyone in his way to accomplish his mission.

This message of physical dominance gives women in the real world a false sense of impowerment. A woman cannot, in 99% of all cases, overpower a man. Yeah, you can find the exception to the rule every once in a blue moon - like a 100 lb. crack head getting sat on by a 300 lb. woman, but that is not the norm. If it were, women would not be beaten and raped. Self-defense classes would not teach women to do anything they can to get away from their attackers and RUN, because you may be able to stun him (mace), but you won't be able to beat him.

All it takes is one swift kick to the groin. 😀 Actually, in my effort to lose weight and tone up, I've joined a gym. In some of the classes I take, I've seen women in better shape than some men, doing things that some of the men can't. I have no doubt in my mind that if an unarmed man attacked one of these women (and no, they are not body builders-just very physically fit) the men would end up a bloody mess.

 

[wk23]

I hate when ice cream hurts my teeth! LOL

 

[Iluv2Btickled]

I get frustrated cuz I have no one to tickle me when I want...or even when I dont want! I'm lucky if I get a friendly poke! That makes me sad...I dont get tickled. 🙁

 

[CellarDweller]

you will get that one day baby!

 

[OBleedingMe]

Well, there's a huge difference between Rambo and Buffy. Rambo isn't running around beating the hell out of and killing mass amounts of the opposite sex - women. Characters like Xena and Buffy and that Kill Bill character are. I have no problem with the fantasy superhero/heroine, I just have a problem with the fact that most of these female superheroines just beat the crap out of men. It's sexist, wrong, and demeaning. I will reiterate: I don't think a woman would appreciate a movie about a male hero beating the hell out of a bunch of women. There are many men out there who feel the same way about these "Man-Bash" movies.

It's interesting that you mentioned the "kick in the groin" myth. This is another falsehood perpetuated by movies/television that are completely misleading when it comes to physical confrontations. If you kick a man in the groin, yes it hurts (as it would a woman), but in many cases it does NOT incapacitate him. Men, just like women, have different sensitivity levels. There are some men out there who can take a shot in the balls and just keep on coming - except now they're really pissed, lol.

As I said before, you can find exceptions to the rule, but for every woman that can take on a very unfit man, there are another 10,000 men who exercise occasionally that can crunch a woman who works out regularly. This is a simple fact of biology. Our testosterone levels enhance and perserve our muscles longer than a woman's. A man can go to a gym, work out for a month, take a few weeks off, then go back, and have relatively little strength loss, especially if he has an active sexual life (increased testosterone levels), whereas a woman must CONSTANTLY work out to maintain her meager (when comapred to a man's muscle growth) toning. You can ask any personal trainer. It's much tougher for a woman to maintain her strength/toning than a man due to their lack of testosterone.

 

[august spies]

Capitalists and Squares!

 

[OBleedingMe]

Capitalists who live in America and whine about the Capitalist System they thrive off of. Like Ward Churchhill - he hates Capitalism but he certainly is CAPITALIZING on his infamous fame by charging 100K to spew his hate speech at local campuses. If ya don't like, go to Canada! Or better yet, Mexico!

 

[august spies]

Well first off, you dont get to pick where you are born. Secondly, if you dont like a system than you should exercise your right to change it, not run away. thats what democracy is. btw (mexico and canada are also capitalist).

Im not "capitalizing" on capitalism, if thats what you meant, it wasnt very clear. Despite capitalism, i am able to work 40hour weeks thanks to anti capitalist labor struggles. also i did not have to work as a child, thanks to anti capitalist labor struggles, also i have free speach mainly to anti capitalist labor struggles. I still have no health insurance do to capitalism, and i still have to pay a substansial amount for school, of which thankfully a large portion is paid for by the state (not capitalism).

To explain churchill, because i dont think you heard what he was saying,
he was not spewing hate speech he was making an instutional analysis regarding the relation between US foriegn policy actions and their consequences. He believes US policy abroad makes terrorist attacks like 9/11 inevitable and i agree. He wast justifying them. In fact to the contrary his activism is probably doing more to stop terrorism than all the killing the government does.

 

[OBleedingMe]

Well first off, you dont get to pick where you are born. Secondly, if you dont like a system than you should exercise your right to change it, not run away. thats what democracy is. btw (mexico and canada are also capitalist).

I never said that you had a choice.

Under the American Constitution, you do have a right to advocate for change, NOT for the overthrow of the entire system. 99% of the country is against you anyway... I ain't too worried about the Socialist party of America taking over anytime soon, lol. Power to the Worker... ha! You just want to take everyone's money (about 70% - 80% if ya follow traditional socialist standards) and give it to a bunch of politicans in Washington because, at the core your philosophies, you don't believe in individuals can handle/deserve their own money. You think a bueracratic machine has to process and handle the money for us anf figure out how to use it and give it back to us. What a joke.... if anything, you are stripping workers of any power they have by taking away the fruits of their labor. What if they wanted to save up and start a business of their own? You know, an independently owned business? Noipe, can't do that. What if they don't like the three-room aprartment the government alloted them? WHat if you don't like the little 3-clyinder Euro car they issued you? Where is the monetary incentive to build and invent, to start new companies? Why should I do that? The government will support me pretty much the same way whether I'm a lawyer or I pump gas!

Look at other Socialist countries. What ahs Sweden/Norway/Holland/Germany produced in the last 50 years? What have their great achivements/inventions been? Sweden makes rollercoasters for us, but then again their engineeers are employed and paid by American companies so I guess you can't really count that. Germany makes some good machinery/cars, but 90% of what they sell they sell to capitalist countries, not their own, so I guess you can't count that one either. Norway and Holland have advanced those oh-so-worthy causes of legal child porn and legalized potheads. Yep, some real achievements. See a pattern? They interact with a Capitalist country, they produce because they have an incentive. Money, a nice house, a nice car, a sense of compensation. Left to their own devices, they create arcane laws in an effort to justify how their own system has "liberated" them from other countries. Legalized child porn and weed. The great pedestals of Socialism! :happy:

I said it once, I'll say it again - I don't trust the politicans with my SS money, let alone 80% of my paycheck!! They're corrupt enough as it is, and you want to give them MORE power!? Thank god you're in the extreme minority.

Im not "capitalizing" on capitalism, if thats what you meant, it wasnt very clear. Despite capitalism, i am able to work 40hour weeks thanks to anti capitalist labor struggles. also i did not have to work as a child, thanks to anti capitalist labor struggles, also i have free speach mainly to anti capitalist labor struggles. I still have no health insurance do to capitalism, and i still have to pay a substansial amount for school, of which thankfully a large portion is paid for by the state (not capitalism).

Once again, I never said that YOU were capitalizing on the system, Ward Churchhill was/is by taking obscene amounts of money (state/federal money - MY MONEY - he bought a bigger hosue with it recently) to spew his hate speech. But I guess you just skipped over that part, punk.

Unions are not anti-capitalist. In fact, they're one of the largest contributors TO capitalism. They have hard workers that produce, earn money, and spend - hence contributing to the capitalist system. There needs to be a balance between the corporation growing/surviving and their workers being fairly compensated for the work they do. If the corporations are too greedy, the workers will not be happy and will not produce/contribute as much. If the workers are too greedy and lazy, the corporation collapses. Of course, some unions wind up gaining way too much power... like the teacher's unions in CA, where you can be a "loud and proud" prostitute and still be allowed to teach children. The corporation should have the final say - after all, they are the ones who created company in the first place and provided the jobs. The workers did not. The workers have the choice to strike or have a work-slow-down (my personal choice - strikes are not as effective) to protest the corporations decision. Unions are not anti-capitalist. They simply band workers together and use their collective talent/skill/CAPITAL (money) to have a say in their pay/job conditions.

Health insurance is actually something I agree with you on. The government has the means to give everyone a minimal health insurance policy. I would agree with this implimentation as long as you are not FORCED to take part in it. If you have been successfull and can afford a better policy, you should be able to purchase it from a private entity. I also don't want to be forced to go to only "government-approved" doctors, hence the need for other private health insurance plans.

As for college, if you do not have the means, then you can work very hard in school for a scholarship. I did. The state/feds will help you out only to a certain point with financial aid, and I agree with that. There must be a semblence of self-reliance in the country. Independence. I don't want some government agency paying for everything I do, because then it feels like they own you. And when they own you, they CONTROL YOU.

Mexico and Canada are not capitalist countries. That's like saying Iraq was a Republic because that's what it said on their (now defunct) official seal, lol. Canada is a Socialist Democracy, getting more and more Socialist all the time, giving more and more power to the government. Mexico is basically a wasteland - its exports are a joke, the only legit money it makes is from American tourism, and every politican up to El Presidentente Foxx is bought off with drug money. They are a country controlled by a Drug Cartel, nothing more.

To explain churchill, because i dont think you heard what he was saying, he was not spewing hate speech he was making an instutional analysis regarding the relation between US foriegn policy actions and their consequences. He believes US policy abroad makes terrorist attacks like 9/11 inevitable and i agree. He wast justifying them. In fact to the contrary his activism is probably doing more to stop terrorism than all the killing the government does.

Oh, I heard what he was saying. He HATES Capitalism. He thinks anyone who participates in the Capitalist system is evil and oppressive. He also thinks they are ALL greedy, stupid, wildly violent, racist, and sexist. That's hate speech. He HATES Capitalists, even though it's that very system that has given him a home, a car, and is paying him over 100K to speak at colleges.

He advocates for the violent overthrow of the government. His wife and himself have physically attacked the media. His wife broke the arm of one female student reporter. Sounds pretty violent to me. He's lied about his nationality (Native American - Cherokee) to beat out ten other Native American professors for the job he currently holds. Sounds pretty racist to me. He can't even get into the Cherokee Nation, and all you need is ONE DESENDENT of Cherokee background to get into that organization, yet he claims he's 50% Cherokee. He's plagarized works of art (when they showed his painting and the original artists side by side on CNN, they were a mirror image of one another) and sold them for profit (selling for profit... is that not yet another facit of capitalism??), has flat out MADE UP historical battles, and has plagarized essays and called them his own.

You said it yourself, my man. He justifies terrorism. He thinks it's better than acceptable, that it's good. He's call the 9/11 victims Nazi's - "little Ikeman's (sp??)" - because they participated in the Capitalist system. Of course, many of the victims in that building created tens of thousands of jobs for the American public, paying out billions in salaries and benefits for work earned, giving the power to the worker. Giving the worker the power to do as he or she wishes with that money. People like him want to take away that right. He wants the government to control the fruits of the public's labor.

For all those interested: Remember the Blood of Heroes...

 

[morgandee]

i kind of hate people i see out on the streets wearing military fatigues and they are not even in the army

since i'm in the army myself it is kind of insulting

it's okay when kids do it because they're not of age and they're probably just aspiring but guys who are old enough and are bums and just walk around the street asking for money it is like wtf ! i want to break their necks with my brazilian jujitsu techniques

(thus using violence productively)

i also hate the anheuser busch commercial

thank you

 

[Timewarp]

I hate people who cheat on online games like CS or HL2Deathmatch. Curse them all.

 

[nessonite1]

Let's try to keep the spirit of the thread, eh? The goal is to state what pisses YOU off, not try to piss eachother off. No fights please!

 

[wk23]

I hate when people use a metal rake to sweep their sidewalk!!

 

[nessonite1]

I hate the new McMansions near my house. In every yard there is one of those $5,000 play sets and yet you'd never know any kids live there since they're never playing outside. The only hint to their existence is the play sets and sometimes you see them waiting for the school bus. Other than that I guess they're all inside playing video games.
That and the houses are freakin ugly.

 

[Timewarp]

I hate living near my neighbors. They're all rich and their yards look nice and tidy. You would need a jet engine to cut up all of the vegatation in my backyard, granted I would even go outside once in a while.

 

[Celtic_Emperor]

People that intentionally paint their house a nasty, eye-sore of a color. That and people that purposely do NOT clean up their yard and leave it looking like a tornado went through there.

I don't know what they get out of it, but I know what the rest of us are not getting- an increase in property land value, and a less likelyhood of selling our houses.

 

[OBleedingMe]

I also hate ricers. Throwing a red rubber body kit, a 5 inch fart can, blasting rap music, and plastering tons of VTECH stickers all over over one's 1991 Honda does not make it a performance vehicle.

THESE are performance vehicles (my cars). My new 2005 Mustang GT and my 1967 Shelby GT 500 (passed down from my father). Let me know what you guys think! 😀

Pics of my 2005 Ford Mustang GT!

Pics of the Shelby!!

(that's me!)

http://img74.exs.cx/img74/7856/shel****aa.jpg

A pic of my 2005 Mustang GT and my 1967 Shelby GT500 together! (my favorite)

 

[naveltkltr1350]

I also hate ricers. Throwing a red rubber body kit, a 5 inch fart can, blasting rap music, and plastering tons of VTECH stickers all over over one's 1991 Honda does not make it a performance vehicle.



Thank you OBM...AR will vouch for me and my hatred towards ricers and their fart cans..lmao..also the aluminum wings that add more weight and take away from the already lack of performance!

 

[MistressValerie1]

Health insurance is actually something I agree with you on. The government has the means to give everyone a minimal health insurance policy. I would agree with this implimentation as long as you are not FORCED to take part in it. If you have been successfull and can afford a better policy, you should be able to purchase it from a private entity. I also don't want to be forced to go to only "government-approved" doctors, hence the need for other private health insurance plans.

That is my position exactly, and is the one issue where I disagree strongly with the Libertarian Party, which opposes all publicly funded health insurance.

 

[august spies]

dude your not listening to what im saying.

1)I never said Churchill justifies terrorism, and of course i explained in my last post that he doesnt and never has.

2)To say mexico is not a capitalist country is absurd, it has a neo liberal pro NAFTA conservative presendent, capitalists are in total control of that nations economy and military, with the exception of a small but widely supported guerilla movement in the south mexico is more capitalist than the US. the last i checked the guy in control of the corn market was a billionare and about half of the nation is living at subsistence. thats what capitalism is.

3) Nowhere did i say i support buerocracy, again you putting words in my mouth. To the contrary Im sure it is you who supports government buerocracy (im assuming your voted for bush or kerry). I want democratic control, not buerocratic or corporate capitalist. I am not a state socialist.

Now to the historical misconceptions.

1) unions: i never said unions were anti capitalist, what i sais that the unions that fought for the things I mentioned above were primarily anti capitalist. and the only reason that they are not anymore is being they were murdered of imprisoned by the government buerocracy you claim to hate. (and for the record one particular anti capitalist union that won us our freedoms a century ago is starting to grow again)

2) the consitution: first off i never even mentioned the consitution, i mentioned the essense of democracy. but even dont think the consitution limits freedom to within the "system" for when they buerocracy u claimed to hate went after the freedoms of radicals in the 60s, it did so in violation of that constituion, that which was proven in the court of law. Secondly, as i stated above i never mentioned the consitution and i dont believe i need a constitution to tell me if i can be democratic or not. there are countries with no or weak constitutions and i fully support democratic resitence movements in those nations.

Churchill: im not churchill and i dont really care about his personal life, its not about that, its about the issues he raises. U should prove you slander however if you going to do that. Also last i saw only about 6% of his salary is paid for by taxes.

9/11 Nazis: Churchill never called 9/11 victims nazis. what he did was call technocrats working in the wtc and pentagon "eichmans" eichman was a nazi technocrat who never actually pulled any triggers but whos job it was to make sure the nazi machine ran smoothly. He was making a statement on the banallity of evil (which he included himself in) and the metaphor was not his own. He never called anyone innocent a nazi and he has gone out of his way to state that people like firefighters and janitors etc... are not technocrats. nazis is just something the media has created.

what else? ... hating capitalism is not hate speach. capitalism is an ideology, like socialism, if you hate socialism does that make you a racist? no. Hate speach deals with racism and homophobia.

Im glad you agree about healthcare, although i think you harbor some misconceptions about anti capitalism. Nobody forces you to do anything, if you dont want the minimal healthcare that can be provided to do (and we all know there is plenty of money to pay for it) than dont take it, how can anyone force you? Lets at least insurace the 13 million children without healthcare. we can at least unite on this issue.

thanks
punk rock

 

[wk23]

dude your not listening to what im saying.

1)I never said Churchill justifies terrorism, and of course i explained in my last post that he doesnt and never has.

2)To say mexico is not a capitalist country is absurd, it has a neo liberal pro NAFTA conservative presendent, capitalists are in total control of that nations economy and military, with the exception of a small but widely supported guerilla movement in the south mexico is more capitalist than the US. the last i checked the guy in control of the corn market was a billionare and about half of the nation is living at subsistence. thats what capitalism is.

3) Nowhere did i say i support buerocracy, again you putting words in my mouth. To the contrary Im sure it is you who supports government buerocracy (im assuming your voted for bush or kerry). I want democratic control, not buerocratic or corporate capitalist. I am not a state socialist.

Now to the historical misconceptions.

1) unions: i never said unions were anti capitalist, what i sais that the unions that fought for the things I mentioned above were primarily anti capitalist. and the only reason that they are not anymore is being they were murdered of imprisoned by the government buerocracy you claim to hate. (and for the record one particular anti capitalist union that won us our freedoms a century ago is starting to grow again)

2) the consitution: first off i never even mentioned the consitution, i mentioned the essense of democracy. but even dont think the consitution limits freedom to within the "system" for when they buerocracy u claimed to hate went after the freedoms of radicals in the 60s, it did so in violation of that constituion, that which was proven in the court of law. Secondly, as i stated above i never mentioned the consitution and i dont believe i need a constitution to tell me if i can be democratic or not. there are countries with no or weak constitutions and i fully support democratic resitence movements in those nations.

Churchill: im not churchill and i dont really care about his personal life, its not about that, its about the issues he raises. U should prove you slander however if you going to do that. Also last i saw only about 6% of his salary is paid for by taxes.

9/11 Nazis: Churchill never called 9/11 victims nazis. what he did was call technocrats working in the wtc and pentagon "eichmans" eichman was a nazi technocrat who never actually pulled any triggers but whos job it was to make sure the nazi machine ran smoothly. He was making a statement on the banallity of evil (which he included himself in) and the metaphor was not his own. He never called anyone innocent a nazi and he has gone out of his way to state that people like firefighters and janitors etc... are not technocrats. nazis is just something the media has created.

what else? ... hating capitalism is not hate speach. capitalism is an ideology, like socialism, if you hate socialism does that make you a racist? no. Hate speach deals with racism and homophobia.

I hate hearing utensils (forks, spoons, etc.) rubbing together....hurts my teeth! Did I mention cold ice cream hurts my teeth too??
What the heck is wrong with my teeth!!!! :grind_tee

 

[naveltkltr1350]

i figured id revive this thread in case anyone needed to rant in here!