Umm hey. I don't post on here often, but this discussion looked pretty... interesting... and I just wanted to get my opinion out there since this is an "open forum."
I agree 100% with daisycrazy and Babbles. What daisycrazy stated was absolutely appropriate. And though she could've privately messaged flecke, it's fine she didn't. Know why? This is an OPEN forum. Opinions can be stated openly, and she had an opinion she felt strongly about, so why not state it in public?
Islandman... no one said anyone appointed anyone to be the "arbiter of acceptable contributions..." daisycrazy and Babbles weren't claiming to be anything like that... once again, they were simply stating their opinions that they thought taking advantage of a drunk is wrong. That was the simple point.
And flecke... you don't need to be so upset. daisycrazy was simply trying to state that taking advantage of a drunk is wrong... but since you DIDN'T do that, no harm. Why not repost your story now that we all have the details? Your concern is that daisycrazy made you out to be a perv... after the details you gave us, don't worry, I'm sure no one thinks that... but also, if you don't want to read the discussions on this thread anymore (as demonstrated by your... horse icon), you actually don't have to keep reading it if you don't want to.
So that's all... I want to say, I'm not claiming to be the arbiter or Mr. Right. I'm just throwing my opinion on this open thread. flecke posted a story that I'm sure was interestingm daisycrazy and Babbles stood up for what was ETHICAL, ect. If I were arbiter, I'd want you all to just remember this is a "free speech" kind of place, and no intense emotions of offense or anger should be felt.
I agree 100% with daisycrazy and Babbles. What daisycrazy stated was absolutely appropriate. And though she could've privately messaged flecke, it's fine she didn't. Know why? This is an OPEN forum. Opinions can be stated openly, and she had an opinion she felt strongly about, so why not state it in public?
Islandman... no one said anyone appointed anyone to be the "arbiter of acceptable contributions..." daisycrazy and Babbles weren't claiming to be anything like that... once again, they were simply stating their opinions that they thought taking advantage of a drunk is wrong. That was the simple point.
And flecke... you don't need to be so upset. daisycrazy was simply trying to state that taking advantage of a drunk is wrong... but since you DIDN'T do that, no harm. Why not repost your story now that we all have the details? Your concern is that daisycrazy made you out to be a perv... after the details you gave us, don't worry, I'm sure no one thinks that... but also, if you don't want to read the discussions on this thread anymore (as demonstrated by your... horse icon), you actually don't have to keep reading it if you don't want to.
So that's all... I want to say, I'm not claiming to be the arbiter or Mr. Right. I'm just throwing my opinion on this open thread. flecke posted a story that I'm sure was interestingm daisycrazy and Babbles stood up for what was ETHICAL, ect. If I were arbiter, I'd want you all to just remember this is a "free speech" kind of place, and no intense emotions of offense or anger should be felt.