Ticklishness and someone elses theory...

[Lord Doctor]

...The origin of which I cannot remember, but it was an ebook on the subject of ticklishness in women.

In a nutshell, what it said was:

Women who have more sex are less ticklish or not ticklish at all, with the tickle sensation being a sort of "preparation" for the intensity of orgasm.




So is the secret to increasing or regaining ticklishness simply... do not fuck?


Anything in that? What do you all think?

 

[TropicThunder]

I don't agree. Just judging from personal experience. I have a moderate amount of sex and I'm still hyper ticklish.

 

[marcusb]

That theory is swiss cheese. Most women are more ticklish after they orgasm.

 

[WheresThe Clip?]

Do not orgasm

 

[TangerineTicklee]

Ermm...

(shrug) This isn't true for me. I'm tickle before, during, and after... So ... I'm not so sure this holds water for *all* women.

O-O

 

[dolinater]

I'll debunk this theory real quick...

watch the clip when Yaqi got to tickle Jenna Jameson, don't think that girl has alot of sex? lol

and she was really ticklish

 

[LD_Tickler]

Not only do I disagree, but I'm at a completel loss as to why anyone would agree. This claim is gibberish to me.

 

[Knox The Hatter]

In a nutshell, what it said was:

Women who have more sex are less ticklish or not ticklish at all, with the tickle sensation being a sort of "preparation" for the intensity of orgasm.

Complete, utter bullshit.

 

[Featherly]

There's no way in Hell do orgasms make women (or men for that matter) less ticklish or non ticklish...whoever thinks that is true needs their head examined xD

 

[TangerineTicklee]

There's no way in Hell do orgasms make women (or men for that matter) less ticklish or non ticklish...whoever thinks that is true needs their head examined xD

Hey, it would vary from person to person, technically. Some people would be made more ticklish from it, others maybe not. For me, I'm not made more ticklish, but it does make me more sensitive - not to tickling - but to anything that isn't light touch. If it's rougher than just light touch during and orgasm, it actually can cause me a little bit of skin soreness, but it goes away quickly. Not sure why, though. =/ Weird.

 

[Musicroxmysox]

I think that theory is a load of BS.

 

[playgirl]

i actually checked the post date to make sure it didn't say april 1. ha!

 

[c7_assassin]

Sounds like Freud to me.

 

[Ticklish9's]

...The origin of which I cannot remember, but it was an ebook on the subject of ticklishness in women.

In a nutshell, what it said was:

Women who have more sex are less ticklish or not ticklish at all, with the tickle sensation being a sort of "preparation" for the intensity of orgasm.




So is the secret to increasing or regaining ticklishness simply... do not fuck?


Anything in that? What do you all think?

I have my doubts, but then again... I'm in the "no sex til marriage" camp and I am VERY ticklish.

On the other hand, I'm not a girl.


I suppose that wasn't very helpful, sorry. :lol:

 

[Lord Doctor]

No, it's not saying orgasms make you less ticklish. It hypothesized that the intensity of the tickle sensation was itself a psychological and physiological preparation for orgasm intensity and that woman who get more sex are generally less ticklish than those who have little or no sex. It was not about ticklishness increasing or decreasing after an orgasm.


Making it simpler, because there seems to be some confusion here:

The theory I read was based on a survey which revealed that the more a woman has sex, the less ticklish she is at any given age than a woman who has little or no sex at the same age... OK, not that much simpler, but...

 

[Flatfoot]

It sounds kinda like, who was it... Nicole Kidman, I think? She said something to someone on some show (lol you don't say?) about how ticklishness is a sign that you're sexually repressed. I don't know if it's true or not. If the argument held ANY validity, I think we'd all be the exceptions and not the rules.

Thinking about the statement, though, that tickling is an anticipation of an orgasm, basically sounds to me like it's calling it foreplay. There isn't anything scientific about that. You tease and tickle someone, things get hot and heavy, some form of sex happens, and BAM. Orgasm!

 

[RosieCreek]

It sounds kinda like, who was it... Nicole Kidman, I think? She said something to someone on some show (lol you don't say?) about how ticklishness is a sign that you're sexually repressed. I don't know if it's true or not. If the argument held ANY validity, I think we'd all be the exceptions and not the rules.

Thinking about the statement, though, that tickling is an anticipation of an orgasm, basically sounds to me like it's calling it foreplay. There isn't anything scientific about that. You tease and tickle someone, things get hot and heavy, some form of sex happens, and BAM. Orgasm!

I remember that interview!
Russell Crowe (actor) was asked if his ticklish, during an Oprah Specials for the Oscars, last year:

Nicole Kidman was interviewing Russell Crowe. Nicole started by saying to Russell that "all I ask is that you not refuse to answer any question and that you are completely honest. And sure as hell, the first question out of her mouth is, "Are you ticklish?" His answer, "Extremely, extremely ticklish" and he shakes his head.

Nicole: Are you ticklish?
Russell: Oh extremely. Extremely ticklish.
Nicole: Because you know what they say about people who are ticklish...
Russell: :confused face: That they laugh alot?
Nicole: Nooooo, sexually repressed.
Russell: :shocked face: really?!?
Nicole: Yeah, lets move off that...
Russell: :laughs hysterically:

 

[ElFewja]

Well... I can see the argument? If you're tense and wound up then yeah.. you'll respond more. But, and here's the thing, if that is the entire basis of their argument then the claim that ticklishness is directly related to sexual repression is invalid. It works something like:

Tense can imply sexual tension or repression.
Tense tends to make responses more violent, so that it would appear a person is more ticklish.
But, sexual tension doesn't necessarily imply tenseness,
therefore, sexual tension does not imply increased ticklishness.

Actually, what the argument is doing is performing a logical fallacy akin to asserting the consequent(or fallacy of the converse). It's something I picked up in my symbolic logic course. It looks something like "If statement X is true, then it follows that statement Q is also true". What this argument does is asserts that the second part of the statement (in my demonstration, Y) is true, and then goes on to say that therefore since we have Y, we know that X is true. But really, think about it; it is entirely possible for Y to be true in the above statement while X is false; all the statement says that if you have X then you also have Y; doesn't mean you can't have Y by itself.

So yeah. Proved argument is false.

Now to support it a bit:

On this forum (and TT as well) I see the topic about age decreasing ticklishness quite frequently. Think about it. The more sex you've had means that you've had more time to have sex (well, not always, but shut up I'm making a point), which implies that the more sex you have the older you are. I think there is a correlation between age and ticklishness, and I think a lot of other members have pointed this out; what I'm saying is, I think these people are misconstruing age for sex in their argument.

It doesn't matter. Their argument is misinformed anyway.

Etc~

 

[GEORGIATKLER]

Nobel prize in medicine goes kinky............................

We had still better get a grant from the NIH and study it over and over again just to be sure. Paging Dr.'s Viper and Jeff, exam dungeon #1!