Where to begin...
First of all Fiend, I could care less where Y2J goes. Thats not to say it wouldn't be great for TNA, but if he wants to work for a slave driver like McMahon, who like nothing better the a nice Memorial Show to boost raitings (and don't be suprised if it is mr Irving who gets it) thats his moral issue. Next, TNA does put on a better in ring product, and it's PPVs tend to revolve around the wrestling more then the anything elts. I do feel it is a mistake to focus on the Story side of things as much as they have, if I wanted that I would revert back to my WWE ways. TNA should focus mainly on the in ring product thus making them different from the other guys, and giving people a reason to want to watch them. Who'd want to see an impersonator when you can see the original.
Putting all the titles on Angle was a mistake, I believe the intent was to have him win it all, and then lose it all in one night (No Surrender PPV). He still has the world title, and "Team SlackMan" will lose the belts at the next PPV to Tomko and AJ Styles, That was a major fubar, and who ever thought that up should lose their job. I watch TNA for it's great in ring workers and thats what they mainly have. There are a few exception, but in general they are very good. Plus suporting a 2nd company make the market compedative and forces WWE to produce better stuff. It's really a win/win.
I'm a TNA guy all the way, and if RoH gets a regular cable show, I watch them to. Anything is better then WWE, except maybe that show MTV had. Oh and there is nothing wrong with Christian Cage's comical spots with his troops, because he can back it up later with a good-great match. In closing I knew guys who said WCW couldn't beat WWE, and for 84 weeks STRAIGHT they did just that. If it hadn't been for some bad deals, and in fighting it might have been WCW owening McMahons ass instead.
