True Tickle Torture

[VERNON1973]

The bottom line is for me, if the ticklee is enjoying it I will enjoy it less!! The ticklee has to want the tickling to stop and be screaming this!! I tickle CHEEKY girls as torture!! Not strangers I might add, girls over the years that have very cheeky personalities and I have given plenty of warning to that I will tickle them if they go on being cheeky!! This is a TICKLING TORTURE LESSON!! This is payback!! This is VERY VERY exciting!!!!!

 

[ChicagoDavid]

If OP is an attractive young woman, she can find guys who hate being tickled but will agree to it if, well, the rest of the encounter is more enjoyable for them.

 

[jhop220]

Well the OP is on the polar opposite side of the fetish as I am. I am not a fan of true torture, or torture in any capacity. I enjoy the sensual/erotic side where the 'lee indulges in the sensations around their body. I love it when a woman doesn't want to be restrained, and softly giggles and moans. I guess I use the fetish as more of a foreplay.

 

[rhiannon]

The ticklee has to want the tickling to stop and be screaming this!! I tickle CHEEKY girls as torture!! Not strangers I might add, girls over the years that have very cheeky personalities and I have given plenty of warning to that I will tickle them if they go on being cheeky!! This is a TICKLING TORTURE LESSON!! This is payback!! This is VERY VERY exciting!!!!!

So this is what you're trying to find people for to team up with? Interesting.

 

[VERNON1973]

Like you didn't know Rhiannon! I think I fascinate you!!

 

[Wolf]

I'm pretty sure that for some individuals, the simple act of posting is mind-blowing fantasy fulfillment.

 

[rhiannon]

Like you didn't know Rhiannon!

I didn't. I had a suspicion, but I didn't know for sure. I always hope for the best in people.

I think I fascinate you

Not really.

 

[gigglemakr]

For me, anyway, what I am looking for most is the laughter. If the lee is screaming with anguish and actually hates the experience, she is very unlikely to want to get together with me a second time. But if she is really ticklish and laughs a lot and enjoys it as well, I have no problem wanting to get together with her again and make her laugh. Her liking being tickled takes nothing away from my own enjoyment. Let me also add I will match my level of "fetish" with anyone when it comes to tickling and I don't really care whether somebody claims that they have the "true" fetish and I don't. Also, I certainly would prefer NOT to go to jail on assault charges.

 

[Clm128]

I'm pretty sure that for some individuals, the simple act of posting is mind-blowing fantasy fulfillment.

Agreed

For me, anyway, what I am looking for most is the laughter. If the lee is screaming with anguish and actually hates the experience, she is very unlikely to want to get together with me a second time. But if she is really ticklish and laughs a lot and enjoys it as well, I have no problem wanting to get together with her again and make her laugh. Her liking being tickled takes nothing away from my own enjoyment. Let me also add I will match my level of "fetish" with anyone when it comes to tickling and I don't really care whether somebody claims that they have the "true" fetish and I don't. Also, I certainly would prefer NOT to go to jail on assault charges.

This is true if your looking for a play partner, but her knowing you you enjo them not enjoying it can addig a please and no don't every now and then to add to it. As long as there not overly dramatic and horribly cheezy then it does the trick.

As for looking for a video as she asked I wanna see a modle pushed to her limits who didn't really know what she was getting herself into. Otherwise it's boring. Videos are for fantasies and girlfriends\ play partners are for the lee as much as the ler. My girlfriend isn't into being tickled but she let's me do it every now and again but thy dosnt mean I'm gonna get out a sonic tooth brush an start torturing her toes when I can get her to squirm from lightly grazing her feet.

 

[Mane'o]

Tybb07 you are a tickle sadist and possibly a tickle masochist.

 

[WheresThe Clip?]

Am I the only one who find it hard to believe that tybb07 is a female.... Not that women can't be into tickle torture, but the entire post sounds like a guy speaking. At least I think so, but I could be wrong of course

Seconded.

Anyway if you don't want the lee to enjoy the experience, why not use canes, or whips, or blunt instruments ?

 

[rhiannon]

Anyway if you don't want the lee to enjoy the experience, why not use canes, or whips, or blunt instruments ?

Now you make it sound like there's nobody in the whole wide world who doesn't enjoy being tickled. 🙂 I'm sure there's plenty of people out there who would prefer canes and whips to being tickled. 🙂

 

[VERNON1973]

Tybb07 you are a tickle sadist and possibly a tickle masochist.

Tybb07, you are a hero!!!

 

[coldneck]

Good luck finding models who are that ticklish and hate it that much but are still willing to be put through it. They're very hard to find. Unless it were done against the model's will, in which case it would be cruel, illegal and, quite frankly, profoundly stupid.

I disagree. I'm willing to bet a video like that would sell like crazy!

I would buy it, and I rarely buy anything with all the free clips out there.

 

[coldneck]

Also, I certainly would prefer NOT to go to jail on assault charges.

Relax, pal. No one goes to jail for tickling. No one.

 

[Wolf]

Relax, pal. No one goes to jail for tickling. No one.

For what you and the rest of the Non-Con Brigade are getting so excited about?...Yes, they would. That's why producers have things like consent forms, and make it clear to the models what they're getting into.

 

[coldneck]

For what you and the rest of the Non-Con Brigade are getting so excited about?...Yes, they would. That's why producers have things like consent forms, and make it clear to the models what they're getting into.

Sorry bud, I hate to disappoint ya, but I've non-conned gobs of women and I'm still very much a free man.

It's been done plenty and I can't find one instance, not a single one, where someone went to jail.

If you can produce some evidence, I would love to see it.

Speculation shouldn't be passed off as fact, because it isn't.

 

[Wolf]

Sorry bud, I hate to disappoint ya, but I've non-conned gobs of women and I'm still very much a free man.

It's been done plenty and I can't find one instance, not a single one, where someone went to jail.

If you can produce some evidence, I would love to see it.

Speculation shouldn't be passed off as fact, because it isn't.

Just because you want something bad enough, you can't make it something it's not. Look, fantasize about whatever you want, no one can judge you on that. But don't pretend it's legal.

Why do we have to have these Non-consensual fantasy threads so often, if you guys are doing it so much for realsies? Aren't you tired?

 

[Cosmo_ac]

Well, unwanted physical contact is probably listed as assault. Tickling a person without their consent, equals touching a person, equals unwanted physical contact. So...Non-con tickling = assault = prison. Fairly simple math. Most people aren't going to press charges for it though.

 

[Wolf]

Well, unwanted physical contact is probably listed as assault. Tickling a person without their consent, equals touching a person, equals unwanted physical contact. So...Non-con tickling = assault = prison. Fairly simple math. Most people aren't going to press charges for it though.

Yup. Lots of things happen to people every day that are illegal by the letter of the law, but don't get charged.

 

[Cosmo_ac]

True. Also it's unlikely that tickling will be explicitly stated, as more then likely the term "Assault" would simply be used, since it's the legal term. Ie, i'm sure some people remember from some years back about, if memory serves, a case where a guy was breaking into houses and tickling feet of women while they were sleeping. I believe they might have charged him with assault, but then they might have just gone after the breaking and entering, since that would be more easy to prove (cause, you know, he was breaking into houses). I'll have to try and find that story.

 

[coldneck]

So...Non-con tickling = assault = prison. Fairly simple math. Most people aren't going to press charges for it though.

If that were true the prisons would be jammed with "ticklers" and they just aren't.
Because no one goes to jail for tickling by itself. As much as you want them to, it just doesn't happen.

The state can and will press charges for assault.
Real assault, not fucking tickling.
Tickling is not assault.


There's a guy on here that does it ALL the time, and takes pictures of his victims.
He's been around forever, has lots of friends and (most) people find it hilarious and ballsy.

So relax, tickle attack someone! It's all good.
Just be sure to share your conquests w/ us.

 

[Wolf]

If that were true the prisons would be jammed with "ticklers" and they just aren't.
Because no one goes to jail for tickling by itself. As much as you want them to, it just doesn't happen.

The state can and will press charges for assault.
Real assault, not fucking tickling.
Tickling is not assault.


There's a guy on here that does it ALL the time, and takes pictures of his victims.
He's been around forever, has lots of friends and (most) people find it hilarious and ballsy.

So relax, tickle attack someone! It's all good.
Just be sure to share your conquests w/ us.

This would be disturbing, if it were even remotely true.

Apparently, Tucker Max has a TMF account.

 

[Mane'o]

There is a disturbing thread running through thid discussion that reflects poorly on the entire fetish community, let alone the tickling fetish community. That is the idea of restraining and tickling someone against their will. The fantasy of tickle torture in our tickling literature and art and videos are works of fiction. In real life tying and tickling someone who can't tolerate it and reacts in ways described in previous posts can and does occur between consenting adults but the emphasis is on prior consent of the ticklee, thus not against his or her will. There are as well situations of surprise and unwanted tickling but that is most often short or in the context of a surprise or wrestling or teasing. That is distinctly different from tying down and tickling someone against his or her will with no consent whatsoever.
And that sort of behavior can in fact be Lund illegal as harassment or various degrees of assault. I easily found case law online for guilty verdicts where unwanted tickling was involved.( I used an app called Fastcase).
The problem with advocating real life restraint and tickle torture of a person against their will is that it is plain and implement a violation of that person and is recognized as such legally. And such claims simply confirm in the vanilla mind that our fetish community is full of sick sadists with no regard for the rights of others and only in pursuit of satisfying our own desires.
Adopting the attitude that non consensual tickle torture is acceptable denigrates nd demeans our entire community.
Fantasy is one thing. No mercy tickle play with prior consent is another thing. Both acceptable. Nonconsensual restraint and tickle torture is entirely something else and unacceptable in this or any community.

 

[VERNON1973]

If that were true the prisons would be jammed with "ticklers" and they just aren't.
Because no one goes to jail for tickling by itself. As much as you want them to, it just doesn't happen.

The state can and will press charges for assault.
Real assault, not fucking tickling.
Tickling is not assault.


There's a guy on here that does it ALL the time, and takes pictures of his victims.
He's been around forever, has lots of friends and (most) people find it hilarious and ballsy.

So relax, tickle attack someone! It's all good.
Just be sure to share your conquests w/ us.

Coldneck, I have to agree with you!! BTW PM me who this guy is?