underage tickling

[Journia]

and where is it?

 

[FeatherJedi]

and is it clean?

 

[FeatherJedi]

Actually, no, thats not all you're saying.

You were talking about hypocracy and now you're channel changing to what underage tickling should conform to.

You said that based on your opinion of how it should be. Isn't that a little hypocrital, in it's own way? You accuse them of being bias, but your own ideal is preconcieved already as well. Either you're all hypocrites, or none of you are.

If you had spoken this way first, instead of jumping to calling people hypocrites, then it wouldn't have been a problem and it wouldn't have been addressed.

Other than that, I don't disagree with what you're saying, and I don't imagine anyone else would either. It's simply common sense.

i went straight to calling them hypocrites because the TMF wouldn't so much as ALLOW a conversation like this

 

[nessonite1]

We will never dectate what type of conversations are allowed. As long as it doesn't violate our rules. if koopa were to provide a link we'd have to delete it. If a thread were to turn into flames and insults we'd probably close or split it. But as long as we can manage to keep a conversation civil you're free to discuss whatever the hell you want.
Not that I'm saying the TMF wouldn't do the same. I don't know enough about them to claim that. But you seem to be of that opinion.

 

[Celtic_Emperor]

i went straight to calling them hypocrites because the TMF wouldn't so much as ALLOW a conversation like this

Again, not allowing something does not make anyone a hypocrite. It's well within the owner's right to be of that opinion and stance on underage material and to hope that his members either feel the same way or at least follow the rules.

If you don't share that opinion, it doesn't make him or anyone else a hypocrite, necessarily, because you disagree. And, if you don't like it, you can leave, which apparently you either have or will.

The problem here is the word hypocrite and how it is being used out of and barely within context. Maybe it's a choice word you have, and you like saying it, I don't know. But being too liberal with such a word when you can't truely judge the content of the character of the owner or his staff is wrong and short-sided.

If I was to use your argument, I could call this site's owner and his staff liberal flim-flammers who let things slide when they shouldn't.

Is such a statement true? And where do I get off calling any of them hypocrites?

Theres no basis for the usage of the word, not in this example and not in what you say happens there.

 

[FeatherJedi]

look, can we just drop the whole hypocrite thing and get back on topic?

 

[poopies1]

doing stuff to children to bring about sexual pleasure is bad, mmmkay.

 

[morgandee]

how are you trying to drop a topic when you were the one to use the word

you can't get away scot free by saying something and not keeping it to yourself instead and then not expecting anyone to have a say in the matter about it

by the way it is hypocrisy not hypocracy i noticed that misspelling earlier and i am very anal retentive about that kind of thing ! :eng101:

 

[Yet_One_More_Idiot]

and where is it?

and is it clean?

I can't post a link, as Nessie says, that would violate TickleTheater Terms of Service (and I've violated enough TOS's lately, getting myself accidentally bounced from AOL over a signature picture...)

Is it clean? Most of the time, yeah. But occasionally, discussions stray a little; the main point of the site is about tickling the children in a way that they enjoy, and yeah, a few of us get off on that, but what you do on your own in the privacy of your own home is up to you I reckon. We would never harm a single child.

And there's also quite a few models out there (mostly girls) ready and very willing to be tickled on camera. Again, gotta know where to look. Most of 'em charge like wounded bulls though....

 

[Journia]

But if it were off of tickletheater.......

 

[ILove2Tickle1]

I'be been reading this thread, and keeping my yap shut for the most part due to the sensitivity of all of this. But here's my two-cents worth. I like ticking, period. But underage tickling doesn't get me cranked sexually. Just fun for me. Same thing with feet, I guess. Kids feet just make me want to tickle 'em for fun.

 

[nessonite1]

Glad we're able to keep this thread flame-free. There are views on this subject covering the entire spectrum. It's good to see people discussing something civilly.

 

[Yet_One_More_Idiot]

Yep, and I'm at the extreme pro-underage end of the spectrum. Complete with underage tickle videos. 😀 And before you ask, I mean aged 12. All tickling in these child-model vids is purely playful, nothing remotely sexual is allowed to take place involving the girls.

I'm probably inviting all kinds of flames with this post, so I'll ask once kindly, please don't bother. 🙂

 

[FeatherJedi]

I'be been reading this thread, and keeping my yap shut for the most part due to the sensitivity of all of this. But here's my two-cents worth. I like ticking, period. But underage tickling doesn't get me cranked sexually. Just fun for me. Same thing with feet, I guess. Kids feet just make me want to tickle 'em for fun.

hallelujia

 

[nessonite1]

Okay...we don't allow public requests to be made to send/receive/trade banned things. It'd be pretty hypocritical if we allowed this to continue. Any further trading of email addressed/whatever will be done via PMs.

 

[MistressValerie1]

To the members whose posts were deleted: there is no reason to post your e-mail address or announce that you are sending someone a PM. If you announce it here, it isn't "private" anymore.

 

[poopies1]

yeah mistressvalerie! you tell all them pedophiles out there! .....please stop deleting my posts

 

[Journia]

pedophiles? I beg to differ Poop. We are not pedophiles, simply because some of us prefer a different kid of tickling to what you may like, does not make us any more of human beings. As such, you are discriminating poop. You are in essence, what extreme evangel;ical christians are to gays and lesbians.

 

[MacD]

We should notice there are two ways of thinking about it.
It is so easy.

For some "tickling" is just a synonym of sex. In this case they really better would not "tickle" minors! If they don't, ok.
Other fetisches like nylons, foot licking and whatever foot-stuff is mixed into tickling.
This can be normal for them but it is not to others. Please everybody, keep that in mind!

(It's not my cup of tea and for me it's too bad that everything is so often reduced to plain sex and btw maybe this is why so less woman show up here? But let me make clear that it's ok to me!!! To each his own...)

Some can imagine to tickle someone without being stripped to the bone and ending in sex. They have playfully tickled their kids, siblings, friends, ...... and they will do it again. Try not to feel too bad about it.


What about that?

 

[Journia]

We should notice there are two ways of thinking about it.
It is so easy.

For some "tickling" is just a synonym of sex. In this case they really better would not "tickle" minors! If they don't, ok.
Other fetisches like nylons, foot licking and whatever foot-stuff is mixed into tickling.
This can be normal for them but it is not to others. Please everybody, keep that in mind!

(It's not my cup of tea and for me it's too bad that everything is so often reduced to plain sex and btw maybe this is why so less woman show up here? But let me make clear that it's ok to me!!! To each his own...)

Some can imagine to tickle someone without being stripped to the bone and ending in sex. They have playfully tickled their kids, siblings, friends, ...... and they will do it again. Try not to feel too bad about it.


What about that?

Precisely. Absolutely Precise. You must sharpen your sword and you will cut a mountain.

 

[FeatherFeet]

There is soooo much red tape here its not even funny. Lol.

One big problem is that everyone's views on tickling, especially here are different. Remember, most people in the rest of the world wouldnt think tickling any different than we would think a bottle of sun tan lotion. I'm sure there is some fetish site for sun tan lotion out there that woudl have a discussion very similar to this "is it right to put sun tan lotion on kids" because they wouldnt be able to differentiate sun tan lotion from sex, which seems to be alot of people's problem here. Now in my mind, if you dont put sun tan lotion on a kid, he could get sun burned and it could be bad for him. Maybe in a non tickle phillie parents mind, its a good thing to tickle their kids because they like it? will have a closer phsyical trusting bond? need to show love/ affection in a playful friendly way? How many parents tickle their kids in fun? MILLIONS. How many grandparents? You think its sexual to them? What about siblings, friends, tickling eachother in fun?

Thats the bottom line here, to the rest of the world tickling isnt sexual, therefore based on a vast minorities sexual views on a topic it cant be proclaimed WRONG to the rest of the world. In that sense, no, there is absolutly nothing wrong with playful fun underage tickling, in fact to most of the world its not something that would require a second thought as underage. It would be as weird to them as saying underage elephant riding. i mean they have those rides at some faires and all, what if someone got off on that? would it make it wrong for the rest of the world? no.

The question is whats right for here, and in that case rules are rules and so they cant be argued. When you bring sexuality into something that is to most people an every day thing then yes it can get messy and you never know who is lying and saying they dont get off on something they actually do, but then again, how is that different from the rest of tehw orld and the rest of life? I mean, people can be getting off anywhere at anytime on things we never would have though possible and things we have fun with. The fact is for alot of the world KIDS ESPECIALLY tickling is a GREAT thing. I mean, in my experience, sometimes the love for tickling is outgrown, but there are almost NO KIDS unless gone through unwanted tickle torture that hate tickling. Why ruin the fun for them because a few people have hang ups on it? Makes no sense to me.

 

[Journia]

Mmmm....mountain butterknife.....*does a homer simpson drool*

 

[MacD]

What a coooooool comparison, FeatherFeet 🙂)) Sun tan lotion.........
But that's exactly the big big problem.

Another of my (!!!) thoughts. Don't you all here think it is pretty strange that some people take the time to find out a cartoon character's age? I mean it is a cartoon, a drawing, nobody real! Think "all persons are 18+ they only look too young because I they are badly drawn" or something 🙂

There seem to be people that really can get off on everything. Maybe those really never shouldn't even touch a kid for any reason. Maybe they should think about touching an adult, because being adult does not automatically mean one agrees to sexual actions. Did you consider that? Maybe they should ask themselfes if they reduce and restrict their live too much by having everything ending in sex?

How lucky am I, being able to keep normal contacts to other people 🙂


Maybe my english is not the best, maybe some will misinterprete me, maybe whatever... But most of you should get my poit of view, have a nice day 🙂

 

[MistressValerie1]

This is not a parenting or child development forum. It is an adult fetish forum, and as such is not an appropriate place for sharing images of children.

 

[morgandee]

mistressvalerie, that text just needs to be on a tickertape or something somewhere on this website