Whats Cyber Tickling?

[KlicDaTick97]

First off thankx to every1 who gave me advice, yesterday was the first time I ever admitted I had a thing 4 getting tickled by females. I have to favors to ask and i would appreciate it a lot of someone could explain what cyber tickling is? Is it like a video game of tickling u could play on the internet and if so where do u go to play it cuz I am really intrigued. I kind of always hope they would make a video game of tickling. Second I would like to ask anyone interested to check out a rap song me and my friends made(I know its funny cuz I listen to rock and I dont talk nothing like a rocker but my friends are rappers so I just played along) please check it out on youtube if u have time. Just type "32dcrue" and click on "The new west coast" thats the sonng we made. But mainly can anyone tell me where to play this cyber tickling game(if it is a game) cuz I really want to try it out.

 

[wishfoot88]

i have done this a few times.
basically it is where you pretend to be tickled/tickle through PMs and chat.
E.G. *strokes soles*
then you would reply your reaction, and so forth.
it can be quite fun.

 

[Aimee]

CyberTickling is like CyberSex

expect instead of using your dick and vagina ... you use your fingers and feathers.

I am not a fan!

 

[badreligion]

Cyber tickling is like cyber eating .... not filling at all

 

[Cavum]

Cyber tickling is like cyber eating .... not filling at all

Amen!



"Cyber" with webcam however...THAT can be fun! 😈

 

[QBWeaver]

It's alot of H's and a's and stuff like this...

Oh No... don't tickle me there.. HAHAHAHAHAHAAAa

That tickles!

See.... lots of H's and A's. And it doesn't tickle. Just wears out your fingers.

 

[JS805]

Whats Cyber Tickling?

It's when two losers pretend they're tickling each other via computer text.

 

[lemoncake]

I will never understand the appeal of it. it does nothing for me.

 

[LD_Tickler]

I will never understand the appeal of it. it does nothing for me.

The appeal is similar to reading tickling fiction. So long as it isn't written with the aforementioned seal sounds...

 

[Mitchell]

I used to be into cyber tickling when I first joined the forum, but I haven't cybered in a long time.

Cyber tickling would go something like this. Say, if I was cybering with a girl named Susan Jones. It would be typed something like "Mitch tickles Susans bare feet", and then Susan would type either "Laughs hysterically" or HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! NOOO STAPPPP! etc.

There can also be specific scenes, like tickling bandit. Mitch might type "Breaks into Susan's house, and demands her money:" Then Susan might type "Please dont hurt me, take the money", and then "Gives Mitch money". Then Mitch might say "Takes Susan to the bed, ties her up in bra and panties, or,. naked, and tickles her feet". Then the Hahahahas start again.

I have found cyber tickling to be enjoyable , in the past, but dont do it anymore.

Hope that helps.

Mitch

 

[Musicroxmysox]

Cybertickling= Lame waste of time. What is the point of pretend tickling, seriously?

 

[-Hari-]

An activity enjoyed by some involving pretending things are happening in the atempt to arouse the imagination via text.

Certain methods can result in damages or wearing down of the "H" and "A" keys on the keyboard.

 

[Skipadeedoodah]

While I don't personally enjoy cyber-tickling, I don't think it's quite the loser-ridden activity some people make it out to be. Like LD said, it can give you a rush similar to reading tickling stories. I don't get into it because frankly I'm not a creative enough cyber-lee LOL I wouldn't know what to say, so I just don't do it.

Don't knock it til you've tried it though. If you and your partner can both be creative with it, I imagine you could have some fun 🙂

 

[AngelOfDarkness]

If you and your partner can both be creative with it, I imagine you could have some fun 🙂

I definitely agree, cyber can go so far beyond, *pokes your sides* and HAHAHAHAHAHAH! It *can* have a deep back story to it, and not just that wank-and-go feeling that some people get from cyber.

 

[Adam]

CyberTickling is like CyberSex

expect instead of using your dick and vagina ... you use your fingers and feathers.

I am not a fan!

Me neither. It just does nothing for me.

 

[Imlatino]

Hmm well I never did cyber sex either its just weird. Kinda like sending a postcard back and forth in the 1940's saying i am taking off my stockings, then 5 days later ohhh yea lol.

 

[Skipadeedoodah]

Hmm well I never did cyber sex either its just weird. Kinda like sending a postcard back and forth in the 1940's saying i am taking off my stockings, then 5 days later ohhh yea lol.

 

[P_Bustleton]

I would cyber-tickle with my ex-gf, and it usually led to cyber-"other stuff" if she was in the mood. Interestingly, she was less inhibited online than in real life sometimes. We would play through fantasies before doing them IRL (and sometimes never getting to).

I enjoyed it, and don't find anything wrong with it - but I wouldn't recommend it to be the only activity you do with your partner!

 

[Bugman]

Me neither. It just does nothing for me.

Same here.If some people enjoy it,more power to them says i.🙂

 

[Artoo]

I think cybertickling gets a bad rep from a lot of people, mainly because it's the modus operandi of Pervy Tickler McCreeperson.

I enjoy cybering with some people - I think of it as an exercise of the imagination.

 

[The_Musician]

I did it to say I tried it and I see as what ever floats your boat lol lol one thing for sure there is a lot of worst things out in this world that people do which is dangerous and sad .

 

[Perduabo]

Its a way for the socially awkward to indulge in tickling role-playing scenarios in IM/Chat without having to go through the trouble of actually meeting someone or forging tangible "real-life" sessions.

That's not to say normal people don't enjoy cyber tickling. But the vast majority I see participating are creepy perv social rejects that give the whole thing a bad rep.

 

[meangry]

It's the same thing as writing tickling fiction/stories, except in this, you have two active people playing roles and there is an active element to it.

As for the people bad mouthing, lets discuss:

First and foremost, I certainly hope none of you have had a long distance relationship. When you have two perfectly normal people, with normal (maybe even heightened) sexual needs, a form of cybertickling can act as stimulating play, can fulfill a need, and provides them the ability to get off without, you know, cheating on their significant other.

Second, while it is true that most people will simply make HAHA's and 'seal noises', it is also true that some people take the play and turn it into a psychological indepth writing exercise. While bad to mediocre cybertickling can be horrible to see and disgustingly weak to read, if you have two people who are capable of writing, then you can come out with something very enjoyable. And given some of the responders in this thread, who apparently take a very literary/creative writing mode with their 'tickling fiction', I find their dismissal to be troubling. Because the reality is simple; your tickling stories are in the same boat as that play aspect you just decried. So either you are hypocritical, or you are elitist. And, to be frank, there are no Herman Melville's or Chuck Palahniuk's or Cormac McCarthy's of tickling fiction.

As for the waste of time slam, well, time is a relative commodity. I'm the first guy to be extremely judgmental of others, but the fact remains, if you read tickling fiction at all and get off on it, or enjoy it, then busting on cybertickling is laughable. I don't see how it is any more a waste of time in the true sense than a clip, a picture, a piece of artwork; in all those cases, the person viewing the piece is not necessarily doing any tickling themselves. Those things, by this opinion, are complete wastes of time. So, here's to you not looking at any of those things, because if you do, then you are a hypocrite of the highest order.

 

[Perduabo]

It's the same thing as writing tickling fiction/stories, except in this, you have two active people playing roles and there is an active element to it.

As for the people bad mouthing, lets discuss:

First and foremost, I certainly hope none of you have had a long distance relationship. When you have two perfectly normal people, with normal (maybe even heightened) sexual needs, a form of cybertickling can act as stimulating play, can fulfill a need, and provides them the ability to get off without, you know, cheating on their significant other.

Second, while it is true that most people will simply make HAHA's and 'seal noises', it is also true that some people take the play and turn it into a psychological indepth writing exercise. While bad to mediocre cybertickling can be horrible to see and disgustingly weak to read, if you have two people who are capable of writing, then you can come out with something very enjoyable. And given some of the responders in this thread, who apparently take a very literary/creative writing mode with their 'tickling fiction', I find their dismissal to be troubling. Because the reality is simple; your tickling stories are in the same boat as that play aspect you just decried. So either you are hypocritical, or you are elitist. And, to be frank, there are no Herman Melville's or Chuck Palahniuk's or Cormac McCarthy's of tickling fiction.

As for the waste of time slam, well, time is a relative commodity. I'm the first guy to be extremely judgmental of others, but the fact remains, if you read tickling fiction at all and get off on it, or enjoy it, then busting on cybertickling is laughable. I don't see how it is any more a waste of time in the true sense than a clip, a picture, a piece of artwork; in all those cases, the person viewing the piece is not necessarily doing any tickling themselves. Those things, by this opinion, are complete wastes of time. So, here's to you not looking at any of those things, because if you do, then you are a hypocrite of the highest order.

That's a very specious argument at best.

Let's discuss .

B your reasoning, enjoying one form of entertainment in the community, but disliking another makes one either a hypocrite or an elitist? How does that work now?

That's the same as having two people in the same room, one who enjoys films and one who enjoys novels. They are discussing the film version of the novel. Now both forms of entertainment have their merits, but each person has their own likes and quibbles regarding the others personal entertainment choices. Would you tell either one that because they prefer on format over the other that they are an elitist hypocrite unless they love and adore all forms of media as one big happy family?

Doesn't work that way. Just because it so happens that I don't enjoy cyber tickling doesn't mean I can't enjoy a good tickling story where at least a LITTLE effort is taken to create a plot with a climax (pun not intended) or look at a piece of art someone drew, admiring their talents and nt having to sit through a bunch of garbage with some inept feebly attempting to carry out his tickling lusts in a cyber session.

But there's my elitism showing 😉 No fear

 

[meangry]

That's a very specious argument at best.

Let's discuss .

B your reasoning, enjoying one form of entertainment in the community, but disliking another makes one either a hypocrite or an elitist? How does that work now?

*Cracks knuckles* Specious? Okay, I will slow down the current topic so you can get up to speed. If you think writing in a story somehow transcends the writing of another form, you are a hypocrite. The line between a tickling story and a tickling rp is, well, nonexistent.

That's the same as having two people in the same room, one who enjoys films and one who enjoys novels. They are discussing the film version of the novel. Now both forms of entertainment have their merits, but each person has their own likes and quibbles regarding the others personal entertainment choices. Would you tell either one that because they prefer on format over the other that they are an elitist hypocrite unless they love and adore all forms of media as one big happy family?

This isn't about preference. This about complete marginalization of one form, and as such, your example is incorrect. We are also talking about one piece of writing to the other in the instance with writing, which is itself inherently flawed, and even transparent to make those who think their story writing somehow different than a cyber tickling rp believe what they are doing is not only not a waste of time, but a fruitful enterprise while the other instance is completely devoid of any sort of value. In the other issue, where cybertickling is consider to be a great waste of time, then there has to be a barometer as to what isn't a waste of time, which alludes to there being a universal policy of what is and isn't valuable. If this is the genuine realness of a tickling scenario, in which one person takes part in the exercise, then all these other forms of media are inherently not valuable, as unless a person has actively taken part in the tickling of a clip or image, it is not of their own experience. When most make the argument against cyber tickling, they discredit it as a way for losers to get their rocks off by pretending. This is no different than looking at an image, a clip, a story.

Doesn't work that way. Just because it so happens that I don't enjoy cyber tickling doesn't mean I can't enjoy a good tickling story where at least a LITTLE effort is taken to create a plot with a climax (pun not intended) or look at a piece of art someone drew, admiring their talents and nt having to sit through a bunch of garbage with some inept feebly attempting to carry out his tickling lusts in a cyber session.

But there's my elitism showing 😉 No fear

No, it does work that way, you just have to say so because your construct of the argument has little to no grounding, and you feel this need to vocally show your own exaggerated ignorance in a showmanship way. Your entire argument hinges on quality; you have already conceded your inability to examine these things from a neutral area, because of your need for absolutes. Your argument for only takes into account developed stories and developed pieces of art in contrast to two inept language retarded mongrels frantically smashing their digits into a keyboard in an effort to get off. There is plenty of absolute shit art on this website, plenty of shit stories, plenty of shit clips. If you wish to argue elements of what makes something 'good', that is an entirely different argument entirely. But systematic lumping of different expressions within a fetish community based solely on ignorance without acknowledging even the slightest hint of hypocrisy is a flawed exercise.

But I guess that's my elitism showing. Solipsism sucks when someone dares challenge it.