Why do 99.9 of the Tickling Videos out there deal with Bondage and Feet?

[ReDsTaR]

I just don't get why? Maybe because Bondage in the Tickling videos that i seen countless times on websites. Maybe thats just not me. But 99.9 of almost every video Deals with some sort of the women being tied to the bed tied upright or in stocks. Same as with the F/m videos its the same Darn thing Now the tickling of the feet i dont have a problem with in the videos. That dosen't bother me. Because its nice to see. But why do video companys that deal with tickling videos ingeneral always have Bondage in the tickling video clips i haven't seen one company that hasn't used any sort of Bondage what so ever. But also maybe the reason i dont feel bondage is neccsary is because Im a christian and that could some reason as why i feel this way. Its just my personal tastes here but i would be more into the playfull type of tickling rather then The stocks and Bondage tickling i see going on time and time again. oh and for The record im not a feet Guy im more of a Belly type of person😀 so in no way do i have a foot fetish.

well Thank you all i would love to hear some of your responses

 

[the_Baron]

i'm a Christian too. and i have considered the implications of all this as well. ultimately, if you've rationalized tickling as a form of sensuality - and there's nothing wrong with that from a religious perspective, then bondage can also be interesting - if its between consenting adults who do not view it as unwanted or demeaning, you can probably still find no reason to disallow the bondage under religious principles.

the big religious issue here would be the whole concept of pre-marital relations. if you keep away from sex, you've still got to consider the arousal content, and then get comfortable with it yourself - either way.

 

[sushi854]

11. Thou shalt not render thy neighbor bound

I don't specifically remember the issue of fetish and paraphilia behavior being addressed in the Bible, but would Jesus really condone sexual interest and arousal by tickling but condemn those into consensual bondage? Or perhaps about 10,000 of us are on our way straight to hell...

 

[WallStreet]

From my experience, women are more ticklish when they are NOT tied up or bound. They stay ticklish longer as well. There are always exceptions to the rule, but I've found that they de-sensitize quicker when tied up. Perhaps it's the nervousness or lack of comfort that comes with being bound, whereas an unbound struggling person feels that they at least have partial control. The less nervous they are, the more they enjoy it, thus making them more ticklish.
There was some footage of mine that was ran at TickleTown where the model that I was tickling had her hands bound above her head. She broke her right hand free of the restraint, and I immedietely began to tickle her right underarm. Her reaction was off the chart, far more so then when she was bound.
The main reason for binding someone, especially in the case of feet, is so that the tickler doesn't get kicked in the face (which has happened to me on more than one occassion).
I use less and less full bondage as I shoot more and more footage. For my last few shoots, all I did was bind their hands together and feet together, without tying them to a bed/chair/etc. These ended up being some of my best shoots. It was tickling that introduced me to bondage, not vice versa.
I have always been a fan of pure tickling. Unless you're going to have sex with the person you're tickling, there really is no need for nudity. I've never been inclined to buy a video because it featured nudity or vibrators or anything non-tickling related. I find that videos featuring these things merely dilute the fetish. Perhaps bondage is also a dilution.
There are many respected producers who include nudity and vibrators, just as there are members of the TMF who enjoy these things in their videos. I'm not knocking it, I'm just stating that it's not something that I am personally into. To each his/her own.

 

[ReDsTaR]

From my experience, women are more ticklish when they are NOT tied up or bound. They stay ticklish longer as well. There are always exceptions to the rule, but I've found that they de-sensitize quicker when tied up. Perhaps it's the nervousness or lack of comfort that comes with being bound, whereas an unbound struggling person feels that they at least have partial control. The less nervous they are, the more they enjoy it, thus making them more ticklish.
There was some footage of mine that was ran at TickleTown where the model that I was tickling had her hands bound above her head. She broke her right hand free of the restraint, and I immedietely began to tickle her right underarm. Her reaction was off the chart, far more so then when she was bound.
The main reason for binding someone, especially in the case of feet, is so that the tickler doesn't get kicked in the face (which has happened to me on more than one occassion).
I use less and less full bondage as I shoot more and more footage. For my last few shoots, all I did was bind their hands together and feet together, without tying them to a bed/chair/etc. These ended up being some of my best shoots. It was tickling that introduced me to bondage, not vice versa.
I have always been a fan of pure tickling. Unless you're going to have sex with the person you're tickling, there really is no need for nudity. I've never been inclined to buy a video because it featured nudity or vibrators or anything non-tickling related. I find that videos featuring these things merely dilute the fetish. Perhaps bondage is also a dilution.
There are many respected producers who include nudity and vibrators, just as there are members of the TMF who enjoy these things in their videos. I'm not knocking it, I'm just stating that it's not something that I am personally into. To each his/her own.

ReDsTaR-- I'm not looking to have a religous discussion here (or anywhere else for that matter), but don't let your religion get the best of you. I'm sure that you are a good person who leads a clean life. As a youth I attended a parochial school, and in my humble opinion, a great deal of the christian religion, as it has been re-interpreted and re-interpreted over the years, is geered towards making people feel guilty. If you went back to the year 100AD or 200AD and found a bible, it would probably consist of drastically different content then the bibles of 2003.
In a day and age where there are those who feel that their religion dictates that they should crash planes into buildings, or blow themselves up taking innocent lives with them, I really don't think that they're saving room in hell for people who indulge in bondage.
That is my opinion, and I realize that there are probably (more like DEFINITELY) members of the TMF who's opinions differ. You are all entitled to your opinions and beliefs. Whatever gets you through the day.

WallStreet

I never said oh that people that ingage in Bondage with there tickling are going straight to hell. I never said that. So when i made that post about Bondage and feet i never said either lets have a religion debate about Bondage used with tickling. All i did was post that thread to see why most of the videos used Bondage in there tickling and why its the norm for ticklig now adays why people liked it(or why most people do) Thats all. so you dont have to start talking about religion in this tread that was not my intent just because im a a christian! I just simple wanna know why tickling companys use Bondage in there tickling thats all Period. simple as that

hope i have cleared up some points

 

[UnclStevel]

Proof is in the pudding, so here's what's up: On google, the most popular searches relating to the subject of tickling (not specific sites) are:

foot tickling
tickling stories
tickling feet
tickling videos
feet tickling

Waaaaaay down below that are:

belly tickling
armpit tickling

It's just what most are interested in I guess.

Steve

 

[milagros317]

I did a poll once here asking if people have another fetish besides tickling. The result were overwhelming: feet

Here is the poll:

http://www.ticklingforum.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=12468

So if people who took this poll at the TMF are representative of those who buy tickle videotapes, then the explanation is clear.

 

[redway10]

Tickling with no bondage is much more of a "battle" when the ticklee is really ticklish. In a video, if the tickler is not being attacked back by the ticklee (intensely), it appears that the ticklee is not really ticklish, and that they are faking their reactions.

And who wants to tickle someone for a video length amount of time while the ticklee is fighting them?

 

[Spenser]

What could possibly be the connection between religious preference and tickling (just curious), and more than slightly offended.

Spenser

 

[jordan]

I'm a Christian myself and the thing that I keep away from my topics is God. I love God, I belive in God, but when you mention God to a large group like the TMF than you get people who want to post there half-assed cracks about God. I think we should just drop it now. If your worried that your going to hell, than fight your tickling fetish and never come here again.

 

[WallStreet]

I have edited my post and deleted all of my remarks pertaining to religion.
Perhaps ReDsTaR and jordan and the others should do the same, as to preserve the point of this thread.
I certainly didn't mean to insinuate that ReDsTaR was likening bondage with a trip to hell.
After their posts have been edited, the mods are more than welcome to delete this one as well.

 

[cincinnatusc]

you should check out ticklechannel.com, all of their 'audition clips' have no bondage. also, if you do a search on webshots, in the community section, for the word 'tickling' or 'ticklish', you will find a ton of photos featuring no nudity or bondage. and, to answer a little bit of the original question, i think a big reason bondage is used in videos is so that you can keep the camera on the action or on the face, if the people are wrestling around, it's hard to get good shots of what's going on (i assume).

ps frenchtickling.com also has some no bondage/ light bondage clips, and so much content it's unbelievable.

cincinnatus

 

[ReDsTaR]

I didn't mean to Turn this Tickling thread into a Religion thread as well. Just because i simply put that i was a Christian in my Orginal thread. But people have made this out to be a religion thread as well as a tickling thread and it shoudn't be that way. so If the Mods here at this website feel the need to delete this thread then please by all means do so.

Thank you🙂

 

[WallStreet]

Edit Feature

No need for the mods. You can use your edit feature and trim your comments accordingly, particularly the part where you felt the need to quote my entire thread directly beneath my original thread.
Your tickling/bondage point was a good one, but I speak from experience when I say that if you don't edit out the religious stuff, this thread will quickly snowball into something else.
There's no need to delete an entire thread when it covers an interesting topic (that being the bondage).

 

[MaxSpeer]

The story of my life. Interested in what is really cool but not the mainstream. Evidence:

I bought Beta machines and tapes
I am a Mac User
I love armpit tickling more than feet

As for the religious implications. There is nothing in the Christian doctrines against consentual, sexual happiness. All that morality crap started with the wacky religious zealots who rewrote Christianity for their own purposes.
I had a good friend who stopped communicating with me because he started feeling Christian guilt. It's sad.

And, in the bondage department. I like it but I would love to see, as the thread-starter stated, more playful tickling in videos. Tickling is FUN. Tickling videos all don't have to be so damned serious.

Max

 

[The Pianist]

Though its not completely without bondage... the preview of www.tickled2death.com/ third video appears to have a bit of bondage free tickling... how much I can't say (1. because they don't ship overseas... but more importantly 2 because I don't have money) but its in there. And for the whole consentual thing... from what I understand, each of the girls are good friends with their tickle partner... so they're pretty likely to be comfortable with it and consenting.

 

[Dr. Bill Kobb]

Three Cheers For Max Speer!

And really, if there's any group out there who should be able to take a little ribbing, it's us tickle-peeps, right?

 

[Knox The Hatter]

Here's the irony:
I never found out until recently that I like being bound (within bounds, of course, no pun intended). It's fun. However, when on the give side, I find that I enjoy it a lot more without bondage. It's more natural that way, you just come over, and out of the clear blue sky, tickle the subject into happy convulsions, reaching for places she's trying to protect, using your strength to hold her down and remove shoes and other impediments.
Nudity was never important, at all. While for me it can turn easily into a sexual situation, to me, having the other person nude only stripped the other person of natural defenses. With me, it's fun to wrestle and fight back, trying to keep the fingers away. It sort of takes away from the fun.
And...WallStreet was offering good, sound advice. He spoke from the heart...

 

[Knox The Hatter]

One other thing...feet rule. That's why.

 

[sushi854]

redstar...

I didn't mean to get the thread way off track or turn the focus to religion either, but you did suggest that a possible reason that you are not into bondage is because you are a Christian. A comment like that may create controversy whether intentional or not.

 

[MrTicklefeet]

why not?

Me, I love feet anyway. And feet are so much fun to tickle.
But i'm wondering, isn't this 99.9 percent assumption just a tad unrealisticly high?