Conclusion
The conclusion to this intriguing tale?
One of my videos was removed due to "inappropriate content". Just what was this "inappropriate content", you ask? Eight girls having their feet tickled with various instruments by two guys. Now, I know that someone already commented that the fact that tickling is being used for sexual arousal is what is objectional, but the fact is I have tickling videos up there that are way worse than the one in question-it didn't even have any bondage, for one thing, and I have several videos which take place in a dungeon, with the lee gagged and unable to see what the ler does to her feet-which when you take into account the wordplay and the obvious pleasure the ler derives from not only the tickling but the outright suffering of the lee, makes it a rather sadistic bit of film-far more questionable, in my opinion, then four girls having their feet tickled by a plastic monster claw.
However, this disproves someone else's comment that the only clips which are removed are the ones that people should be paying for. This clip was actually a preview clip, which the company itself posted on various tickling sites for people to download for free. If anything, being on youtube would have gotten the actual video far more exposure. So I subscribe to the scenarios presented earlier, that the google buyout has led to a questionable but systematic purging of what they deem "questionable" material.