• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

15 Facts Of Tickle Science!

Aeveirra

TMF Expert
Joined
Jan 20, 2015
Messages
318
Points
0
Greetings all those reading this post, as many of my friends on here know... Aside from the fact I love being sadisticly tickle tortured, <3
I also am rather obsessed with the neuroanatomical features of the brain.
So, regarding both tickling, and its' relationship to the brain,
So, after reading a few articles on the matter I have compiled a list of some of the most incredibly fascinating facts about the science of tickling!
If you want to read those articles, I posted links to them a the bottom.
I hope people get to learn some new things about the sexiest fetish in existence! Lol 😉

1) Knismologania: The medical term for tickle fetishism.
(This one was not from the articles, but I figured I would add it because even here, not too many people have heard of this before.) now you can call yourself a "knismo" , and sound fancy about it. Lol

2) In general, it is easier to measure social /humorous laughter on an fMRI, than ticklish laughter.

3) Tickling is a very primitive adaptation in humans, so primal that it is suggested that tickling is what helped early man to become self-aware, and develop self consciousness.
(Cool stuff! Right?!? Lol)

4) Wether or not laughter is involved, the brains' processing when being tickled has a separate sensory system. And it has a laughter system different in many ways from humor.

5) The areas in the brain that become active when one is being tickled and laughing are:
* the UNM nerve: Nerve fibers that process pain
* Rolandic Reticulum: (also active in all types of laughter)
* Rolandic Opercunicm: part of the above term, controls facial expressions
* hypothalamus : regulates hunger, sexual behaviors, and body temperature.
* Multiple areas associated with anticipation of pain

6) Ticklish laughter does NOT activate the nucleus Acumbus, which is an area involved in sexual pleasure. However, it does activate the hypothalamus, which includes governing basic sexual urges.

7) brain scans indicate that both joyful mocking, and voluntary laughter activate areas involved with social interaction.
But, The laugher from Tickling does NOT activate those regions.

8) Charles Darwnin first proposed tickling aided the evolution of self wariness in humans.
(Wow! Over a century and a half later, and this guy is still getting things right! Lol)

9) The laughter types At their core are processed differently;
Social laughter is processed as language.
Laughter from tickling is processed as pain.

10) ticklish laughter is considered to a "building block" of humorous laughter. Almost like a less sophisticated "ancestor".

11) People who have a Tickling fetishism often "disproportionally like it" to the degree, where tickling is the preferred activity to sex.
(This is on wikipedia, and I believe it is probably 90% true, having met many people like this I can personally confirm that this is a more "obsessive" kink than people think.)

12) There was a machine created for the sake of "scientific research"
attempts to study the effects if stopping laughter. It holds a subjects Head in place, and tickles their foot. When they laugh, the facial restrains tighten to stop the subject from laughing.
( I really have no idea how using such a machine like this can result in anything scientific. Lol but it is quite unique, and definitely worth checking out the link to a video of thing "testing" in action.)

13) Ticklish laughter stimulates area of "higher order thinking", which could be used to Improve intelligence. That, or is at least supporting evidence for how tickling aided cognitive evolution.

14) The acoustics between laughing socially, and laughing from being tickled, have different sound patterns, which non-verbally communicate different messages. The acoustics pattern for ticklish Laughter, is most similar to cries of distress and pain.

15) The only gender difference in tickling, is that only the a small cluster of gray matter in women's' brains are activated, while this same region is not activated in men. This is beloved to have something to do with emotion and feelings of safety.



CONCLUSION.
I was rather surprised To learn jus how different laughing by jokes, vs laughing by tickling were. I mean... REALLY different.. For one thing... Being tickled is not painful, but our brains can not make that distinction until we tickle ourselves, and nothing happens!
I also, did not know that the brain is wired to activate areas and nerves for pain.Everything about the tickle sensation and reaction seems to be painful, or unpleasant, tickling does not activate the pleasure-rewards system,but for whatever reason this activity is strongly fetishized.Instead of being connected to joy, or happiness, their findings showed how tickling is categorized as being "pain" , but is not at the same time. .... It seems that tickling results in a response more similar to the feeling of being in danger. Weird....

So the explanation I came up with as to why there is a sexual association with tickling, is that the fetish portion comes from the primitive sexual instinctive behaviors controlled by the hypothalamus which becomes activated when tickled. This means that this is still a fetish that is related to sexual behavior, but it is not a part of the"pleasure rewards" system, and has roots in the animalistic-like instincts. It is more unique most kinks, because it is one that utilizes an entirely different brain system making this being something instinctively driven by a primal sexual drive that was fundamental to early man becoming a sapient species.
I personally think that makes tickling fetishism a hell of a lot cooler than all the others.
Just another reason to love being a knismo! 😉 lol.
Or be forced to love it, because your sexual animal instincts take over and you just can't help it sometimes, jk, lol.
However you wanna rationalize it. 😉

The results they found were interesting BUT!!! The subjects they chose did NOT sexualize tickling in any way. I can not be sure, I do not know them, and that is not what they were being tested for. But it got me thinking...
It would be fascinating, and gennually important to science if they repeated these experiments with people who...'really like' tickling. Which means how the majority of people on this site 'really likes it' . 😉
Haha, I really am serious about this has a potential for new discoveries.
I mean how would you find enough subjects to give valuable data? I would totally volunteer for something like this! I would never complain, and be willing to be 'tested' all day <3
Just think how different those results could be?
What implications would this have ? And could it tell us more about the fundamental levels of sexuality? Who knows.?.... It has yet to be done.

Everyone I talk to about how they got into this fetish tells me the same things;
1 they have always known since a VERY young age.
2 They could clearly remember a 3-5 second clip from a cartoon, they watched over ten years ago, where characters were tickled.
3 And for 'lers, ticking can often feel like an impulsive need for them, and they rarely do not miss the chance to tickle others when possible.
So, if any one or all three of those apply to you, maybe the science behind it can help you to better understand yourself. It did for me, my love of being ticked is not too different than powerful urges to crave it... At least now I partly know why. And Gosh.... It has... Such a STRONG affect on me.... I just...love it <3 ...

That is all. 🙂

I would love to get some feedback on what your thoughts are about this. Wether it be the science, my primal urge hypothesis, or

Even better, what you think would happen if they tested people who do get sexual pleasure from being tickled, as opposed to their subjects who presumably were not fond of, or were neutral to it.

------------- SOURCES REFERENCED --------------
( i recommend reading all of them, this stuff is so interesting. )

1) *** identification of Brain regions for ticklish, and other types of laughter.
http://news.yahoo.com/brain-area-ticklish-laughter-found-195513122.html

2) *** Electrochemical activity, when laughter is voluntary, humors, and when being tickled.
( This is a cool one! You need to understand anatomy to fully appreciate what this means though. Regardless, it is still worth seeing.)
http://www.lohdownonscience.org/sci...brains-interpret-different-kinds-of-laughter/

3) *** How we process social vs tickling laughter
http://www.lohdownonscience.org/podcast/laughable-research/

4) *** Different acoustics and nonverbal communication
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/260345.php

5) *** About ticklish laughter, and how it differs from social humor.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/13/ticklish-laughter-brain_n_3266795.html

6) *** Tickle testing machine that stops laughing
http://henriknieratschker.de/tickling machine.html

7) **** Wikipedia ; page for "tickling fetishism"

8) **** Awesome detailed diagram for you to better understand anatomy
http://hiddentalents.org/brain/113-map-print.html

*** I also referenced my prior knowledge in the conclusion. I know many people In this community, and I have three years experience in the felid of research-based neuroscience.
 
Thanks for the links. Some of those articles are very interesting. 😀
 
i am a nurse. i once took care of a woman who had her pain terminals burned out in her brain. she had severe chronic pain, and this was her last resort. it worked btw. my point is that i strongly disagree that tickle sensations use the pain pathways of the central nervous system. the patient i mentioned was very ticklish after the surgery! proof to me that some other nerves are utilized to transmit tickle sensations!

steve
 
Thanks for a most interesting post... just what the Doctor ordered... er, um... cough...

Well done!
 
I think you asked the right question when you wrote - "Even better, what you think would happen if they tested people who do get sexual pleasure from being tickled, as opposed to their subjects who presumably were not fond of, or were neutral to it."

Even though they probably won't run that test, I think anyone into tickling would be very interested in those results. The nucleus accumbens, right? One of us might light that sucker up like Christmas if we were tested.

I'm always curious about the questionnaire they give to people prior to testing. I wonder what questions they had to answer and how those questions influenced (or didn't) the results.
 
I watched the tickle test machine video and have one question... What's up with the "canned" laughter?
 
That machine is obviously not real, it looks ike it's made from old toilet paper rolls and Scotch tape.
 
I find the science behind this to be intriguing--especially because I disagree that environmental factors contributed to my fetishization of tickling. I cannot think of one specific instance that triggered this for me, and I'd love to understand more. I'll have to check out those links when I have spare time.
 
A study by Harris and Christenfeld in the '90s showed that those who watched a comedy video and then were tickled did not laugh more than those who watched something else first. As there's a warm-up effect for comedy, the reasonable conclusion was that laughter from tickling is not related to humor. http://www.nytimes.com/1997/06/03/s...-is-serious-business-at-the-research-lab.html. This supports your #s 4, 7, 9, 14.

As for testing those who really like tickling, why do you think - apart from signs of arousal - the results would be any different?
 
I know, i would not think so either.
They do to a degree use the pain processing system. Three differnt articles had support for that.
But it is clearly differnt than pain, I agree that differnt nerve process pain and ticklng, but the same brain regions for anticipating pain became active. Not my words, just what I read,
 
I saw this PBS Special a long time ago and at the end, Alan Alda asks the woman conducting the study if she likes tickling - I might be paraphrasing but something like that - and she gets real shy and giggly for a second, doesn't answer but it's obvious. Anyway, it was years ago but I remember thinking she's one of us.

http://www.pbs.org/saf/1105/resources/transcript.htm#2
 
That's nice that the research on tickling continues.
We already practice tickling as therapy for some years and can conclude that tickling can be healthy and fun almost for everyone. And the paradox is that the more ticklish the person - the more positive the effect for her/him.
 
Hi,

Big time lurker here. Still in the closet with my fetish, so it's very hard for me to discuss tickling. I think this is my first attempt at posting.

I have a scientific background and obsessively look for peer-reviewed journal articles regarding the subject.

The #6 "fact" caught my eye. Just thought I'd point out this article.

Tickling increases dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens and 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations in adolescent rats.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23399995

50 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations in rats has opened the door to animal models of tickling. Including the development of novel anti depressants based on the tickling of rats. In particular, Rapastinel (GLYX-13) and NRX-1074. I could go much deeper, but I'll leave it at that for now.

Tickling-induced 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalization is individually stable
and predicts behaviour in tests of anxiety and depression in rats
http://www.onesci.com/w/wix/images/0/0a/Tickling_Rats.pdf

I was hoping to make a similar post one day, to start scientific discussion regarding tickling. But this thread was good enough to prompt me to post. Thanks for that Aeveirra 🙂

Regards,

Adam
 
Hi, Adam. I can only imagine what it took for you to post after lurking for almost a decade. I hope we see much more of you.

Very interesting articles. I'd only point out the distinction between knismesis (light touch) and gargalesis (heavy touch leading to laughter). While we call both "tickling", they're quite different. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knismesis_and_gargalesis. Your articles seem to deal with knismesis. But gargalesis is what I and most people here are interested in, and it isn't clear how much the research on one applies to the other.

That said, keep 'em coming!
 
Hi, Adam. I can only imagine what it took for you to post after lurking for almost a decade. I hope we see much more of you.

Very interesting articles. I'd only point out the distinction between knismesis (light touch) and gargalesis (heavy touch leading to laughter). While we call both "tickling", they're quite different. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knismesis_and_gargalesis. Your articles seem to deal with knismesis. But gargalesis is what I and most people here are interested in, and it isn't clear how much the research on one applies to the other.

That said, keep 'em coming!

Ah, yes. I assumed most people here already knew the differences.
And all the articles/ studies I referenced were all having to do with laughter-inducing gargalesis.
Gosh... I just love being tickled <3 it totally drives me crazy and makes me hornier than anything else. Lol 🙂
 
I just love being tickled <3 it totally drives me crazy and makes me hornier than anything else. Lol 🙂


Duly noted... Now what time was our 'appointment' again? 😉:blush:

I think I'm developing Ler's Carpal tunnel, feather swish & flick syndrome...
 
What a super hot breakdown of tickling! I have always LOVED tickling and do tickle literally as often as I can! Most of the time it's quick friendly/flirtatious tickles but sometimes it's a full on tickle torture session! 🙂
 
Wow! Thank so much for this! It's really amazing the time and effort you put into this info! I truly do appreciate it and thoroughly intrigued.

Thanks again.
 
I think you asked the right question when you wrote - "Even better, what you think would happen if they tested people who do get sexual pleasure from being tickled, as opposed to their subjects who presumably were not fond of, or were neutral to it."

Even though they probably won't run that test, I think anyone into tickling would be very interested in those results. The nucleus accumbens, right? One of us might light that sucker up like Christmas if we were tested.

I'm always curious about the questionnaire they give to people prior to testing. I wonder what questions they had to answer and how those questions influenced (or didn't) the results.


idk if The questionnaire would or would- not have a major influence on the results per-say.
i would however be very interested to see the comparison. for instance, what you said about the nucleus accumbens.
One question before the test could be a "Rate how turned-on you become when your feet are tickled: (1 to 10 )"
The next question could be: "Rate how turned-on you become when your belly is tickled: (1 to 10 )
THEN
tickle-text both those places, and see if people who rated higher, have more or less brain activity.
that would be really amazing if there was a strong enough correlation where such activity could be predicted! 🙂
- - - I wouldn't mind making up a hypothetical pre-tickling test questionnaire, just for fun to see what types of questions i come up with and would like to test!
 
Door 44 Productions
What's New

12/6/2024
Supporting our advertisers also supports us!
Tickle Experiment
Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top