• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • Reminder - We have a ZERO TOLERANCE policy regarding content involving minors, regardless of intent. Any content containing minors will result in an immediate ban. If you see any such content, please report it using the "report" button on the bottom left of the post.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

AI tk videos and the future of producers ?

kingmaker

1st Level Orange Feather
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
2,158
Points
63
We are all thinking about the safety of our jobs with AI, so I have started to see how replaceable my studio was by testing some tools.

Current State of the technology is :

AI Stills
-> You can do basically anything
Sound
  • Voice cloning is pretty good
  • Sound effects are hard but actually you don't really need them
  • Lipsyncing is hard.
  • Tickling Laughter is not easy to generate.
Motion ->
  • Generating a whole video from scratch is currently almost impossible (Limited to 10 second scenes and hard to stitch).
  • The costs are getting lower, but the time it takes to get an acceptable output + the amount of trial / error is superior to anything made IRL
  • Generating animated Backgrounds (for Greenscreen) is good.
  • Deepfakes and motion copy are very promising (but still spottable)
So all in all, at the current state of the technology, someone making a full AI studio will not get very far. Specialized tools for NSFW use will arrive, but tickling is a niche within this area so I don't really believe we are going to find convincing full AI stuff for a while.

Personally I think that some stuff are worth looking into
  • First, Story clips can be enhanced (crazy locations or costumes for a fraction of the production cost)
  • I have also seen some AI able to change a camera angle (kind of things you could use very carefully and lightly)

- And the last things are related to Motion Capture and Deepfakes.
It is easy to see bad uses ot the technology (using a celebrity or a random person image, this will be a Big No), but I see something else.

Like in movies and video games, you see these special suits with white ping pong balls, it turns an actor into Gollum, a dragon, or a Na'vi,

So with the same principle, you could film the action and transform your ticklees / ticklers into any output (characters, creatures, ...).

So basically, I don't see AI replacing anything, especially as 95% of the people will want to see real people.
But maybe we will soon start to see something that looks like a kinky tickle video made by pixar.




 
I hate AI and will never voluntarily use it OR consume AI generated content. When I see a FB post with an obviously AI illustration-which happens more and more-I automatically hide it.
 
And don't get me started on AI porn..."Human girls are overrated, baby" Ugh. Gross. Almost cures me of my porn addiction.
 
Yeah I don't see how I would ever spend the same amount of money on fake AI porn versus real girls. It's a novelty at most.
 
I think producers have been on their way out for a while. Models can produce and distribute their own material via OnlyFans and such, they don't really need us anymore. Besides, people who consume the content don't care about us, just the models. If they can get content of equivalent quality directly from the model they forget we even exist.
 
Yeah, of the three, AI, producer, or directly from model, producer is probably challenged the most. But tickling is one of the activities that is best done by two, and where the performance of the tickler plays a big role.

content of equivalent quality directly from the model
- which in my experience can be an issue. But besides the price, another advantage is that there are many ways to communicate where the model earns money. I've had a lot of fun using messages, photos, custom videos and live came for long running online roleplays. It would be great if the customs were made by a good producer but I don't see that being practical.
 
Yeah, of the three, AI, producer, or directly from model, producer is probably challenged the most. But tickling is one of the activities that is best done by two, and where the performance of the tickler plays a big role.

If the model needs a tickler, she can hit up another model. They travel together and collaborate more often than not. They don't need us anymore and haven't for some time.

The only reason we still exist is that we have an audience large enough to allow us to continue to give them money, so it's an extra income stream. If an amateur has access to a boyfriend who's a halfway decent tickler they have zero reason to seek out a studio.

Hell, most of the people here are pretty vocal about how much they hate us, especially if we're male. We're basically a necessary evil at this point, but for how long?
 
I think producers have been on their way out for a while. Models can produce and distribute their own material via OnlyFans and such, they don't really need us anymore. Besides, people who consume the content don't care about us, just the models. If they can get content of equivalent quality directly from the model they forget we even exist.
Except models are not really into it (mostly). Lack of authenticity, and they always do the same (easy) things with bad equipment.
Producers (good ones), try to do better, innovate.

Also producers bring fresh blood, the kind of girls that will do OF is not anyone, it's motivated girls that are ready to do it a job. The amateurs are brought by producers
 
What's New
1/29/26
Visit Clips4Sale for a great selection of tickling clips!

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Top