• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Animal Abuse On Youtube (Something I'll never understand)

Status
Not open for further replies.
It was through another user name. Your simply an immature troll.

My simply an immature troll did what?
If I trolled you, it's probably because you were somewhat deserving of it. 🙂

If you say so. I mean for someone who claims he never met me or talked to me you seem to know a lot about me. I mean considering what I just said as an 'uncontrolled emotion'... My God you make it sound like you know me so well.

Your tirades in this thread seem to be proof enough that your emotions regarding the subject are somewhat uncontrolled; why else would you be getting all butthurt on a forum in which, in the grand scheme of things, it makes little difference whether we agree with you about the horrors of animal cruelty or not.

And you didn't call me out on anything. You simply said I lost at a game. Obviously you were the only one playing.

My apologies if the metaphor didn't carry over. Due to the fact that you seem to need everything spoonfed to you, what I meant was that until you wrote that, I was somewhat in agreement with what you were saying (animal cruelty is bad, blah blah). But when you make sweeping generalisations in order to make your point, it hardly does you any favours. Hence my quoting said fallacious generalisation, and informing you that you had just lost the game. 🙂

Yeah I suddenly care what you think... And if you thought it was so terrible you should have said that before instead of trolling my topic hoping to get a rise out of my 'uncontrolled emotion'.

If you don't care what I think, why did you start the thread? 🙂

Sounds plausible to me. Reminds me of these one guys who were saying crap about adults asking kids to tickle one another on youtube. He tried to make it sound like the kids were just as guilty as the adults were. Made me wonder why he would say that. Or how about childless adults who claim parents are too protective of their kids. Makes me wonder why they would say or make that claim themselves.

Remember when being homosexual was illegal, and those who were proponents of legalising it were considered gay, regardless of their actual orientation? The metaphor can be extended indefinitely, and this is what I had an issue with in my first post in this thread.

Why would someone defend animal abuse and make jokes on the subject? Makes me wonder if they aren't kicking around some poor animal themselves. Why try to make murders seem like animal lovers instead of animal abusers themselves? Why do that?

Because from the dawn of time, people have made jokes about dead babies, gang rape, and cutting animals open so we can drink their blood. People make jokes about anything, but does it mean they're guilty of physically doing what they insinuated in their imaginary, yet somewhat humourous, scenario? Methinks not...
 
Because from the dawn of time, people have made jokes about dead babies, gang rape, and cutting animals open so we can drink their blood. People make jokes about anything, but does it mean they're guilty of physically doing what they insinuated in their imaginary, yet somewhat humourous, scenario? Methinks not...

I would like to take this time to make it clear that I have never condoned throwing a chicken across the road.
 
Who the hells talking about tickling kids? Is that how you justify things? Pulling random bits of information out of the air and posting it? Why don't you stick to the subject at hand?

lol right now your just trying to turn things around on me. I was giving a simple example about what I was talking about. You know this would have worked a lot better if you cut out the last part. You know the part where I say, "Makes me wonder why they would say or make that claim themselves." If you cut that out then I could have said something about it, but you did do something that I could call you out on. You did leave out the last of that sentence. You know the part where I'm wondering why people would defend or make jokes about animal abuse.

Right now you can't defend anything that you've said. You can't defend your joke because you already look insensitive about the subject. So now you're simply acting like a troll.
 
Artoo:
My simply an immature troll did what?
If I trolled you, it's probably because you were somewhat deserving of it. 🙂

If that's how you can justify immaturity.


Your tirades in this thread seem to be proof enough that your emotions regarding the subject are somewhat uncontrolled; why else would you be getting all butthurt on a forum in which, in the grand scheme of things, it makes little difference whether we agree with you about the horrors of animal cruelty or not.

Lol that's simply how people try to win fights. They first try to throw other crimes at the person who's pissed off, trying to make the one they are angry about sound less serious. And then they try to make the person pissed off sound like he's so out of control that he can barely contain himself. Or see the light.

Let me guess... Next you'll say something about me seeing enemies everywhere. I feel the walls closing in on me. Lol.


My apologies if the metaphor didn't carry over. Due to the fact that you seem to need everything spoonfed to you, what I meant was that until you wrote that, I was somewhat in agreement with what you were saying (animal cruelty is bad, blah blah). But when you make sweeping generalisations in order to make your point, it hardly does you any favours. Hence my quoting said fallacious generalisation, and informing you that you had just lost the game. 🙂

My god can I get a map to this sentence? I can barely understand anything your saying. Spoonfed? Generalisations? Favours? lol! You are a troll!


If you don't care what I think, why did you start the thread? 🙂

lol because 9/10 times people who are pissed off about animal abuse post here. I'm actually surprised more people haven't. And secondly is that how you see yourself? Someone makes a thread and you think they really really care what you think? I don't care what you think because I simply look at you like a troll. I mean you posted saying I lost some sort of game. What am I supposed to do now? Take you seriously?


Remember when being homosexual was illegal, and those who were proponents of legalising it were considered gay, regardless of their actual orientation? The metaphor can be extended indefinitely, and this is what I had an issue with in my first post in this thread.

lol troll troll. There are exceptions to every case. Excuse me if I didn't list every single piece of information beforehand that would contradict what I said earlier.

But either way you look at it it's still someone defending animal abuse by posting crimes that could be considered worse.

Because from the dawn of time, people have made jokes about dead babies, gang rape, and cutting animals open so we can drink their blood. People make jokes about anything, but does it mean they're guilty of physically doing what they insinuated in their imaginary, yet somewhat humourous, scenario? Methinks not...

I bet you're the type who'd justify jumping off a bridge because everyone else has already. And when I'm talking about justifying animal abuse I'm not talking about a joke. I'm talking about actually justifying it. Not about the joke. About actually justifying animal abuse. Which has been taking place in this topic.

It's obvious you jumped into this conversation not knowing what you were talking about. You are a troll. Someone simply hoping to get a rise out of me. Simple as that.
 
Ermm.. So what is the topic about? Who's a troll and who isn't?
 
Ermm.. So what is the topic about? Who's a troll and who isn't?

Trolls:

1. Meangry
2. tequila!
3. Artoo

People who aren't trolls:

1. Anyone not on the list above.

What's the topic about:

People on youtube who justify animal abuse by talking about other crimes they consider 'worse' and using the 'they are just animals' excuse.

Topic Derailed by:

1. Meangry
2. Tequila!
3. Artoo
 
I'm a troll, you're a troll. Everyone's a troll troll.

More of Artoos 'Humor'. He thinks he's funny. I've been reporting most of his off-topic posts. Like this one.

People like him make light of dark situations. No doubt if I made some thread about soldiers being murdered he'd have some joke lined up for that.
 
People like him make light of dark situations. No doubt if I made some thread about soldiers being murdered he'd have some joke lined up for that.

Oh come now...even I have to draw a line somewhere...
It depends on what nationality the soldiers are. 😀
 
My god can I get a map to this sentence? I can barely understand anything your saying. Spoonfed? Generalisations? Favours? lol! You are a troll!
Those words actually do exist. Add them to you're vocabulary.

lol because 9/10 times people who are pissed off about animal abuse post here. I'm actually surprised more people haven't.
I read this as "9/10 people agree with me, and the rest are trolls whom I don't take seriously"

lol troll troll. There are exceptions to every case. Excuse me if I didn't list every single piece of information beforehand that would contradict what I said earlier.

But either way you look at it it's still someone defending animal abuse by posting crimes that could be considered worse.

I bet you're the type who'd justify jumping off a bridge because everyone else has already. And when I'm talking about justifying animal abuse I'm not talking about a joke. I'm talking about actually justifying it. Not about the joke. About actually justifying animal abuse. Which has been taking place in this topic.

Then find someone who was actually justifying it before you make a thread, rather than punk kids giggling their heads off while they type hateful crap on Youtube for the fun of it.

Also, nazi sympathizers, marijuana, spanish inquisition, locker searches, those beeping things at Target, my hair is a bird, your argument is invalid.
 
tequila!: Those words actually do exist. Add them to you're vocabulary.

Actually the words 'spoon fed', 'Generalizations', and 'Favors' exist. Not the ones he was going on about.

I read this as "9/10 people agree with me, and the rest are trolls whom I don't take seriously"

Another case of the pot calling the kettle black.

Then find someone who was actually justifying it before you make a thread, rather than punk kids giggling their heads off while they type hateful crap on Youtube for the fun of it.

You mean like you? With that joke you made?

I don't have to go to youtube in order to do that. I just have to make a topic on here and you come running.

Also, nazi sympathizers, marijuana, spanish inquisition, locker searches, those beeping things at Target, my hair is a bird, your argument is invalid.

Not invalid. Just not accurate with every case.
 
More of Artoos 'Humor'. He thinks he's funny. I've been reporting most of his off-topic posts. Like this one.

People like him make light of dark situations. No doubt if I made some thread about soldiers being murdered he'd have some joke lined up for that.

But wouldn't this:

Predictable...

I know to a troll who's trying desperately to get attention it's a joke. But some people do take this seriously. You could try and respect that, but instead you go out of your way to pull crap like this. Crack jokes and simply show everyone how much of a troll you are. Eventually you will cross a certain line and you'll be banned. You'll be forgotten and no one will remember the little troll who tried.


tequila! and Meangry? Have you ever heard of this guy named Headsnap? I haven't seen this guy in a while. I don't know if he posts here or not anymore. I don't know if he was banned. Frankly I don't know anything about the guy other then his posts. This guy was an attention seeker. Like you two. He came into peoples posts claiming he was extreme. He told some guy how he could kill himself when he was feeling depressed and wanting to take his own life. He told people he didn't care that a girl lost her life, that he was more concerned with the traffic flow.

He said all that garbage. And you know why? Because he was like you two. I don't know if he really cared or not. Frankly I don't care if he did. It didn't change how I felt. But I do know this. He was an attention seeker who wanted people to believe he was some incredibly cool, unfeeling person. And as far as I know he came and went and I could have been the first person in months or years to mention him.

That's the truth of things around here. You guys try so desperately hard to paint yourselves a certain way and in the end you, like me and the rest of us, are simply user names.

Like I said. Little trolls who try.

Sure I'm sorry. It was serphriothXcloudforever111 and ilovedicks222 and... lol see where I'm going with this? These aren't groups. They are simply losers and trolls trying to make themselves look awesome and cool!

He's just trying to get a rise out of me or the rest of us. That's how he works. It's all about attention or revenge at this point. Before he came in with the cat story, until I said something that pissed him off. Then he comes in trying to be extreme by claiming he doesn't care. I 'lol' him and then he came back with that.

He'll either admit he didn't mean it. Say he does. Or not say anything at all.


People like this are predictable.

Sure Meangry let's get into the semantics of this subject material. Let's do that. Go ahead and justify it for me. Take all the time you want too. Go ahead and grab all the information you can about this and just lay it on me. Show me what kind of expert you are. Go right ahead.

And of course I'll just laugh at you for trying.

lol right now your just trying to turn things around on me. I was giving a simple example about what I was talking about. You know this would have worked a lot better if you cut out the last part. You know the part where I say, "Makes me wonder why they would say or make that claim themselves." If you cut that out then I could have said something about it, but you did do something that I could call you out on. You did leave out the last of that sentence. You know the part where I'm wondering why people would defend or make jokes about animal abuse.

Right now you can't defend anything that you've said. You can't defend your joke because you already look insensitive about the subject. So now you're simply acting like a troll.

Artoo:

If that's how you can justify immaturity.




Lol that's simply how people try to win fights. They first try to throw other crimes at the person who's pissed off, trying to make the one they are angry about sound less serious. And then they try to make the person pissed off sound like he's so out of control that he can barely contain himself. Or see the light.

Let me guess... Next you'll say something about me seeing enemies everywhere. I feel the walls closing in on me. Lol.




My god can I get a map to this sentence? I can barely understand anything your saying. Spoonfed? Generalisations? Favours? lol! You are a troll!




lol because 9/10 times people who are pissed off about animal abuse post here. I'm actually surprised more people haven't. And secondly is that how you see yourself? Someone makes a thread and you think they really really care what you think? I don't care what you think because I simply look at you like a troll. I mean you posted saying I lost some sort of game. What am I supposed to do now? Take you seriously?




lol troll troll. There are exceptions to every case. Excuse me if I didn't list every single piece of information beforehand that would contradict what I said earlier.

But either way you look at it it's still someone defending animal abuse by posting crimes that could be considered worse.



I bet you're the type who'd justify jumping off a bridge because everyone else has already. And when I'm talking about justifying animal abuse I'm not talking about a joke. I'm talking about actually justifying it. Not about the joke. About actually justifying animal abuse. Which has been taking place in this topic.

It's obvious you jumped into this conversation not knowing what you were talking about. You are a troll. Someone simply hoping to get a rise out of me. Simple as that.

I reported this as well.

Actually the words 'spoon fed', 'Generalizations', and 'Favors' exist. Not the ones he was going about.



Another case of the pot calling the kettle black.



You mean like you? With that joke you made?

I don't have to go to youtube in order to do that. I just have to make a topic on here and you come running.



Not invalid. Just not accurate with every case.


Also be considered "Off-topic" material?
 
Topic creator often has to roll with the way things are going in order to get it back on track. Normally you would depend on a moderator or admin to help you, but not in this case.
 
Topic creator often has to roll with the way things are going in order to get it back on track. Normally you would depend on a moderator or admin to help you, but not in this case.

The only GR content that has been modded, I believe, was a statement coming from you. As OP, sure I guess you could try to swing things back onto topic, but by replying to things that you consider "trolling", instead of reporting them and moving on with the discussion, then you aren't really doing anything but blowing up your own thread.

There have been a few people in here attempting to converse with you, but you've distracted yourself with blowing out apparent trolls that you've lost track of your own conversation with them, which WAS on topic.
 
You mean like you? With that joke you made?

I don't have to go to youtube in order to do that. I just have to make a topic on here and you come running.

The difference here is that they were responding to a soldier throwing a puppy off a cliff, and I was responding to a full-grown adult getting all WAHHH about how kids act while on the internet. It's tough for me to take something like that seriously.
 
I know it's going to happen. They'll either lock it. Some mod or admin will issue a warning to everyone posting about keeping it civil or they'll delete all the posts not related to this topic.
 
The only GR content that has been modded, I believe, was a statement coming from you. As OP, sure I guess you could try to swing things back onto topic, but by replying to things that you consider "trolling", instead of reporting them and moving on with the discussion, then you aren't really doing anything but blowing up your own thread.

There have been a few people in here attempting to converse with you, but you've distracted yourself with blowing out apparent trolls that you've lost track of your own conversation with them, which WAS on topic.

I've been reporting. I was just told to stop reporting a few moments ago. Something about the processing being hell or something like that. Funny thing is they took the time to tell me to stop. I don't see how much more time it could take for them to tell people to knock it off. Guess the OP is always the bad guy for trying to keep things on topic.
 
The difference here is that they were responding to a soldier throwing a puppy off a cliff, and I was responding to a full-grown adult getting all WAHHH about how kids act while on the internet. It's tough for me to take something like that seriously.

QFTW.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
What's New
11/15/25
Visit Clips4Sale for more tickling clips then you can imagine of every sort!!

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Top