OK this post is kind of a rant. Please bear with me.
I just listened to a discussion about the use of animal in tickling videos. During this conversation I listened to I understood and respected the opinions of the parties in respect to their distaste and their non belief in if it tickles or not.
The parties went on to talk about how this is considered bestiality. And though I disagreed with their thoughts and opinions on the validity of using animals as , for lack of better word, "tickling tools". I found them defining using animals for tickling bestiality as one of the more extreme broad definitions of a term I have heard in a very long time.
To say that dogs, cats, whatever licking the feet, tummy, armpit of a person as bestiality is like saying the fact that you enjoy watching a guy tickle a girl is a form of homo-eroticism if you are a guy. Or saying that the scenario of watching a woman kidnapped or "chloroformed" and then tied up and tickled as a form of satisfying your urge to rape someone. Or spanking is attempted murder.
Using an animal as a tool for tickling is not bestiality. Unless the animal is licking and tickling the genitalia of the person. Then it is because that is sexual relations with the animal.
The reason people use animals for tickling is that if you can get it right the animal will lick without regard to the pleas or noises of the person being tickled. It is a form of tickle torture. The theory (though the animal rarely licks for that long of a period of time in all reality) is that a person would eventually show compassion and after a period of time lessen or stop the tickling. Where an animal doesn't care it wants whatever food substance is coated on the part of the body of the ticklee and will lick until it is gone, and sometimes longer.
I have had the privilege of using both dogs and cats in play sessions with people in the past and i can attest that the people I was playing with were very receptive to the tickling. I have also known women who let their pets lick their feet because it does tickle and they did not have anyone that tickles them on a regular basis. I know of one woman whom i have known for many years who went as far as to train her lab to lick her feet on command and would lick for a while regardless if anything is on her feet. And it drove her crazy and tickled her immensely.
That being said. What do you think? Do you think I am off base with my strong objection to the classification of using an animal as a "tool" for tickling as Zoophilia? Do you think it is gross or sick to do so? Do you think that the tickling that people see from animal licking someones feet in a fetish film as being staged or fake?
I just listened to a discussion about the use of animal in tickling videos. During this conversation I listened to I understood and respected the opinions of the parties in respect to their distaste and their non belief in if it tickles or not.
The parties went on to talk about how this is considered bestiality. And though I disagreed with their thoughts and opinions on the validity of using animals as , for lack of better word, "tickling tools". I found them defining using animals for tickling bestiality as one of the more extreme broad definitions of a term I have heard in a very long time.
To say that dogs, cats, whatever licking the feet, tummy, armpit of a person as bestiality is like saying the fact that you enjoy watching a guy tickle a girl is a form of homo-eroticism if you are a guy. Or saying that the scenario of watching a woman kidnapped or "chloroformed" and then tied up and tickled as a form of satisfying your urge to rape someone. Or spanking is attempted murder.
Using an animal as a tool for tickling is not bestiality. Unless the animal is licking and tickling the genitalia of the person. Then it is because that is sexual relations with the animal.
The reason people use animals for tickling is that if you can get it right the animal will lick without regard to the pleas or noises of the person being tickled. It is a form of tickle torture. The theory (though the animal rarely licks for that long of a period of time in all reality) is that a person would eventually show compassion and after a period of time lessen or stop the tickling. Where an animal doesn't care it wants whatever food substance is coated on the part of the body of the ticklee and will lick until it is gone, and sometimes longer.
I have had the privilege of using both dogs and cats in play sessions with people in the past and i can attest that the people I was playing with were very receptive to the tickling. I have also known women who let their pets lick their feet because it does tickle and they did not have anyone that tickles them on a regular basis. I know of one woman whom i have known for many years who went as far as to train her lab to lick her feet on command and would lick for a while regardless if anything is on her feet. And it drove her crazy and tickled her immensely.
That being said. What do you think? Do you think I am off base with my strong objection to the classification of using an animal as a "tool" for tickling as Zoophilia? Do you think it is gross or sick to do so? Do you think that the tickling that people see from animal licking someones feet in a fetish film as being staged or fake?
okay what is this smiley icon? lol
