foottickler1983
4th Level Red Feather
- Joined
- May 28, 2006
- Messages
- 1,788
- Points
- 0
What do you think about this girl?
love her elfish looks
like her bone structure.
She has very thin hips , boney but not too bad
Breasts look quite sweet
and must admit to having a preference for a Blonde.
Well she looks fit , nice figure , fuller breasts than other girls . Looks older than other girls too , nice hips , and her bra and panties look nice against her dark complection .

Heres a couple of pics , tell me what you like about these girls .
Yes she is Skinny enough for my liking , i agree that small breasts are nicer , i like to see pert breasts , love to tickle her all over . Heres a couple of pics , tell me what you like about these girls .
more of her
Girls are endeavouring to look younger and younger nowdays , flat boobs and child like hips .
I'm the first one to say that all body types can be beautiful and you should NEVER try to morph your body into someone else's ideal.
However, leave room for the fact that for some of us, the thin body type is 100% healthy and natural. I've been slender all my life, I eat rich foods indulgently, and I don't consciously exercise (I take walks semi-regularly, but only because I want to be outdoors). Being underweight is not fun. People look down on you as though you are an anorexic, make comments in restaurants while you're trying to eat your dinner, and generally make you feel uncomfortable in public.
Yes, some girls are not meant to be thin, and it's awful that they feel they should be. However, I don't think it's fair to put a person down for being attracted to thin girls, any more than to berate someone who loves "big beautiful women". While it wouldn't be right to announce that anyone above 110 lbs (or who has red hair, or brown eyes, or three legs, whatever the case is) is unattractive, I don't think it's unnatural to have a "type" in one's own mind.
I have "types", and while I wouldn't disregard someone on face value, I don't think it's shameful that I find certain features to be arousing. I think I'd get chastised for saying it out loud or in print, but I would bet money that I am not the only one who feels the same way. I just don't like the fact that it's considered (by some) piggish to lust over rare or "less realistic" features, and perfectly acceptable to be fond of features which are more "realistic" for the majority.
My ideal types have features on many levels besides the physical. I'm nothing close to perfect, but I am selective, I feel I have the right to be honest about who I am attracted to. I dated a man who I had no attraction to, although he was handsome. Everyone guilted me into dating him because he was a nice man, but to me it's wrong to lead someone on when you have absolutely no chemistry. I knew from day one that I was never going to be romantically interested in him, so why was it so taboo to decline without "giving him a shot"?
I felt so bad I dated him for three weeks when I wanted to stop it after the first date. I ended up hurting the feelings of a very good person because he had thought everything was going great. If someone dated me for three weeks and thought I was unattractive the whole time, I would be hurt too. So shoot me for thinking it's kinder to be honest with someone, even if the honest answer is not the PC one (well, of course I wasn't that blunt when I broke it off, nobody deserves to be told they are not appealing to the person they like).
Re: these pics...Ive seen better breasts on a chicken sandwich.
venray said:Slim Pickens.....
(shoulda saved that for the other thread)
Robace252 said:Re: these pics...Ive seen better breasts on a chicken sandwich.

