Fair enough. So, let's say your OB/GYN went into the business because he likes fondling women. But he doesn't let on in any way that you notice. He just sets up a hidden camera in his exam room so he can tape you undressing, and record the exam for his private enjoyment later.
At what point does this cross the line? When he turns on the camera? When he shares the film on the gynecology fetish forum? Or is everything OK as long as you don't know about it and you aren't made to feel uncomfortable?
It crossed the line when it left his head. When he turned on the camera, when he touched her inappropriately, when he went skeevy in his voice or face. That's when it crossed the line.
I guess everyone in the world is just everyone else's cum sponge, (physical contact included) as long as no one has to admit it.
Well, yes. I walk around a shopping mall in a low-cut top, and some teenage punk might notice my breasts and fantasize about them later. Pretending such things never happen seems a tad naive.
We're not talking about enjoying doing your job, like my hairdresser friend who loves doing hair, and making people feel beautiful. We're talking about someone getting sexual pleasure from what they're doing, without the other person's consent,under the pretense of providing a professional service. It's a lot closer to rubbing up against someone on the subway. But a little more cowardly.
No, again! Rubbing up against someone on the subway is a violation of their body and personal space. Thinking unclean thoughts while you do your job is not.
This comment actually reminded me of
this oldie but goodie from Dan Savage. The upshot is that we get weirdly uptight about enjoyment that is sexual vs. enjoyment of any other kind, and somehow only the former is wrong.
Standards of professional behavior are usually set within the profession. And I don't know of any non-sexual profession that considers it all right to derive sexual satisfaction from a customer.
In any profession, a professional might get more enjoyment out of working with an attractive customer than an unattractive one. And we don't beat them up for thinking the client was cute, even if they do proceed to unclean thoughts later.
I don't see how you can justify the idea that going into that profession "for the express purpose of" such enjoyment is extra-wrong. Take a surgeon who does breast augmentations. Surely he has an aesthetic sense of what nice breasts look like, presumably because he likes them himself? Do we say that as long as his interest is purely aesthetic, it's okay? But if he creates sexy breasts and likes them for being sexy, it's not okay? But if they're "beautiful," then it is okay? Aaaaaaarrrrrrgggh!
I think it's obvious that it's morally wrong, but of course there is no such thing as thought police and people think some pretty fucked up shit.
I don't think it's obvious. I think I viscerally find it icky, but what I find icky does not define what is or is not moral. I think that fantasies that stay solely inside a person's head, with no outward manifestation, cannot be considered immoral, and certainly are not comparable to a physical violation of someone's person.
To throw in one more familiar example: plenty of people have tickling fantasies around here.
😛 If you write a story about another TMF member, it's kosher to ask their permission. You would certainly do so before taking their picture, even if you never intended to post it. But if you wanted to make yourself comfortable with pleasant thoughts of another TMFer from afar, would you feel obligated to send them a PM first to seek permission for having arousing thoughts? That would be a tad ridiculous, would it not?